I’ve posted this in IMHO because I don’t think there’s an absolute correct answer to this but rather it’s a judgment call.
Suppose you’re in the wilderness, several days from any medical help, and your hiking partner falls down an incline and gets a huge gash in her leg.
In the process of falling, the wound gathers all sorts of dirt, rocks and assorted organic gunk. Bleeding is not intense, so a major artery was not ruptured, but enough blood is oozing out that unless the wound is closed fairly quickly, problems from blood loss will become an issue soon.
You are going to do your best to close the gash with some straps from your gear, but the question arises about whether to cleanse the wound first, and if so, with what.
You don’t have any clean water, and the only water nearby is some stagnant pond water that looks very nasty.
So, because the urine of a healthy person is normally sterile (and you are healthy), do you urinate on the wound to cleanse it before you wrap it up?
Do you use the stagnant water?
Or do you use neither, and just hope that the medical folks you get to several days later can fight the nasties that most certainly will have taken hold in your friend’s wound – and may have spread throughout her body?
I don’t know why I think of these odd worst-case scenarios – maybe it has something to do with the fact that I’m a nervous parent of two young children …
P.S. I just thought about something. Do military medics concern themselves with these types of questions? After all, the wound I described might very easliy arise during combat, and battlefield conditions are very less than ideal.