Thank you for the link. I read it. I also searched Mercola. There are more positive than negative about him.
We are just fighting ignorance here, aren’t we? So, read everything.
And if the cure is changes in diet and lifestyle? How do you patent it?
Changes in diet and lifestyle don’t cure cancer. And perhaps you’ve noticed that a lot of big companies sell food and dietary supplements.
That’s not how facts work.
If you read the article, you would realize that the number of cancer diagnoses have increased 300% in the last 50 years. So, I guess there are more customers, eh?
If you had read the article, you would realize that they are actually less complex. Actually quite simple to understand.
Because we’re better at diagnosing diseases and people are living longer.
Read some better articles. What we’ve learned is that cancers can function in all kinds of different ways. That makes it very unlikely one thing is going to cure all cancers.
Another one who doesn’t read. Read the article and let’s discuss.
Facts become evident when we read everything available. We are just fighting ignorance here, okay?
I didn’t even have to read that article to realize they are selling something.
edit- from the article:
"GMOs: Avoid genetically engineered foods as they are typically treated with herbicides such as Roundup "
That’s a non sequitur at best, and imho actually is just fear weaseling.
Increased life span. Most cancers don’t develop until late in life.
Life expectancy when I was born (1960) was 69, now it’s 78(men). That alone will allow many more cancers to develop in those extra years.
Who’s giving the positive? Carefully filtered stories on his site? Other sellers of woo medicine?
No, facts become evident as the result of careful, rigorous research and analysis. Not by throwing a bunch of crap against a wall and then seeing what sticks. For example you seem to be accepting Mercola’s nonsense even though people have already explained why he’s wrong.
Yes, living longer in rest homes, with people changing their diapers.
Apparently all cancer has the same metabolism. Cut off its groceries and it starves. Logical, no?
How do you do that without starving the patient? And I doubt that cancer(which is a myriad of diseases) all share the same metabolism. If that’s so widely known, then a cure would have been found by now.
That’s not close to accurate.
There is no reason to read anything, if you already have the answers.
Not really- and what does this have to do with anything?
I don’t think you know what metabolism means because this sentence does not make sense. (Or else you’re reading someone who doesn’t know what it means.) Yes, almost anything will die if you prevent it from getting nutrients. There are drugs now that do things like preventing tumors from growing blood vessels, for example. That doesn’t mean curing cancer is simple.
You must have missed where I mentioned something I read in the article.
What would you like to discuss? Please be specific, don’t make sweeping “what ifs”.
Different diets different responses. It is not a matter of starvation and food, okay.
Cures are profit motivated. There is no profit when the cure is change of lifestyle.
The website you are referencing is profit motivated.
That bit about increases in cancer is nonsense- comparing cancer diagnosis rates in 1900 with today’s rates is absurd.