Would it be illegal for me to use a pic of Hillary Clinton as a rifle target?

I suspect that if local law enforcement, for some reason, knew that you were keeping track of the president’s travel plans, and had looked into book tickets for sites along that itinerary, perhaps had been overheard by co-workers saying positive thing about Leon Czolgasz, John Hinkley and Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, then your little joke wouldn’t seem funny.

Or if you were nicknamed “Squeaky,” because you gotta figure the pressure of being called “Squeaky” would drive a person to something.

For those of you who haven’t been shooting, lately, it’s not at all uncommon for targets to feature sexy models (actual photographs of women) or cartoonish bad buys. The simple black and white humanoid silhouette you see in movies is not the beginning and end of targets.

What Lizard said. It would be a incredibly retarded thing to do publicly if was the goal of the shooter (in any form or fashion) to protect his right to keep and bear arms. The right to gun ownership is not an absolute, and if enough people get the impression that shooters are irresponsible children this right could be legislated out of existence.

Considering the heightened general paranoia and sensitivity in U.S. society over terrorism, I would suggest you utilize Osama or Saddam instead of any U.S. citizen for the time being. Unless, of course, you relish the idea of detainment. “…Homeland Security” is just another phrase for “…Unamerican Activities.” McCarthy lives!