I was browsing a local bookstore recently and came across a really marvelous collection of architecture in one of those huge high-quality color photo books that costs a fortune.
Imagine someone came in with a camera and went through the book methodically photographing every page and then left without buying the book. Would it be illegal if all they did was use the photographs for their own viewing?
Unless they have written permission of the copyright holder it’s illegal. Also the store wouldn’t have to allow you to photograph the book even if you had permission, because the store owns that copy. Nothing grants you the rights to copy a book for personal use. You want it, you buy it.
That’s kind of what I figured, although I’m wondering if a digital image, if it’s never committed to a hard copy and never shown to anyone, still counts as a reproduction.
I guess the closest paralell would be taking a Video Recorder into a movie show and recording the movie for your own use. Or in the old days you used to be able to go into a “listening booth” and listen to vinyl album. Some people would bring portable tape recorders. Of course in both cases the quality is bad.
Even if you own it? Suppose you buy the physical copy and then copy it, intending to load it onto your own personal e-book reader. This is analogous to ripping a CD to load the songs on a personal mp3 player. Is the former example illegal, while the latter is legal?
Duly noted. My question was more of a partial thread hijack.
Let me reverse the situation. If I own an ebook, am I within my rights to print it out so I can read it on the crapper? If so, why is this not a two-way street?
(Maybe this necessitates starting a new thread)