The problem is companies HAVE money. They have lots of it. ABC News just did a piece on this. Companies have money but aren’t spending it.
First, they are afraid that if they spend the money and the economy doesn’t pick up it a gamble they’ll lose.
For example, let’s say by using overtime they can increase the output by 5%. They can’t increase it anymore because there are physical limits on workers. But if they spend money and hire people they can increase it by 15%.
Sounds pretty straightforward, but in these “iffy” economic times it’s better to take the 5% and be safe, then take the 15% and lose the ENTIRE business if the forecasts don’t pan out.
More importantly, employers have learned they can get away with it. They can pay depressed wages and use the economy to scare workers into more production.
Until the job market picks up, this will be the case.
For example I find when I go on job interviews, even for something like a front desk clerk in a hotel or accounting manager in a hotel, the jobs are for LESS money then I made in 1998.
And if you factor in the fact the minimum wage is twice now what it was back then, it tells even more.
Third, in this economy really was able to weed out the deadwood. I don’t mean people who didn’t work (though there were some in there) at their job, but jobs that weren’t needed. Until we get a robust hiring cycle, like we had in the late 90s, you won’t see those jobs come back.
Lastly, we now have employers able to use part time workers. Most jobs I go for that are low level, minimum wage, the employers are offering between 20 and 30 a week.
This is hiding a MUCH bigger problem than unemployment, which is underemployment.
This has hidden consequences such as unstability.
For example: Mr Road Runner works for ONE company and makes $10/hr and works 40 hours a week. That is $400/week
Mr Coyote working two jobs making $10.00 at each job and working a total of 40 hours a week . He is also making $400/week
But Mr Coyote is likely NOT to spend any more money than he has to, because having two job makes him feel unsecure. He knows if he loses one, he can’t fall back on the remaining one and even if he can get unemployment insurance, it will be very little and that is IF he gets it.
So economists will look at this and see two people working similar hours and same wages, but in reality you have two people, Mr Road Runner who sees his job as stable and will spend. When you spend you help the economy. Mr Coyote won’t spend so even though he’s making the same money, working the same hours, he isn’t helping any.
It’s small little things like these that simply aren’t being addressed, and until they are you’re creating problems. Of course economists and policitican (BOTH Republicans and Democrats) are too busy manipulating numbers to show they’re doing something.