Here is my summation and last word (I mean MY last word, you guys can go on babbling all night if you want).
The problem with the OP is that he, like many straight people, is not necessarily homophobic, but that he has bought into the myth of gays as ravenous sex maniacs who are just barely controlling themselves in the presence of straight guys, and who must be firmly warned away lest they snap and sexually assault you at the drop of a soap.
Esco, if all that is bothering you is that gays in a locker room might see you naked, guess what? You are probably looked at and judged for your looks 20 or 30 times every day. If you have a cute ass, straight women have probably looked at it in lust on the street hundreds and hundreds of times. And before you tell me that this is OK because you are attracted to women, remember, many of those getting an eyeful might look like Agnes Skinner (mother of Principal Skinner on the Simpsons). Does that creep you out, ESCO? What about when you go to the beach, Esco? Do you know how many fat girls with mustaches are discretely looking at your basket? Does that creep you out? Or how about straight men and women who notice if you are facially handsome or plain? It happens every time you meet someone, Esco. Does that creep you out?
The only solution for you would be to get a sex change, become a strict Muslim, and wear a Burqa and a veil. Otherwise all these people, gay and straight, looking at you and judging your appearance is simply life. Get one!
And Tomndebb, I have a bone to pick with you (not a big one, and all puns unintentional :D) but I will get to that.
It is this assumption that I and many gay men find insulting, that we must be firmly warned away. The eternal “I have nothing against gays but don’t try to force that stuff on me!” It is that warning that I find so demeaning. **OF COURSE **you don’t want a sexuality that does not interest you forced on you! **OF COURSE! **Do you think we gays are morons, or uncontrollable sex maniacs, or both, that you deem this warning necessary?
Take an analogy. A visible minority (say black or Latino) family moves into your neighbourhood. You welcome them, are really nice to them, bring a basket of muffins, and just as you are leaving you remind them that your neighbourhood does not condone prostitution and drug dealing. Are you surprised if the family is suddenly angry and insulted? OF COURSE no nice neighbourhood wants that. It is the warning that is insulting.
So here is the tiny bone I want to pick with Tomndebb. In post 21, you said “(I would not even be bothered by a request for a date as long as (the gay guy) accepted a polite “no” as the end of the discussion.)”
Did you see what I mean? Did you catch your little bit of subtle stereotyping? It is like telling a black person you have nothing against him as long as he doesn’t try to mug you.
**OF COURSE you would expect him to accept a polite “no”! ** So would every sane, civilized and reasonable person gay or straight.
Why did you need to specify that? Just to be safe, because you can never tell about “those people”?
Why not have said: “I would not even be bothered by a request for a date although I would turn him down.” Why not just assume that the hypothetical gay guy who just asked you for a date is reasonable, civilized, and willing to take “no” for an answer?