Would you let your friend do this degrading, deperate deed?

I don’t think it’s right for the Skeevy Fellow to take advantage of Emma as he proposes, but I don’t see an ethically consistent way to stop him.

As for involuntary psychiatric commitment: it depends on the degree of disturbance the person is evincing. Danger to others, certainly. Imminent danger to one’s own life and safety, surely. But what Emma is consenting to isn’t quite that. It’s more like someone who repeatedly gets involved with domestic abusers because of psychological issues. I wouldn’t commit someone for that either.

Oh course I’d let her. I’d support her either way. I’d think making the film would not be her best choice, but I’d keep that to myself, except asking her questions that might lead her to make that decision for herself.

“Doctor” was just my shorthand, the actual OP talked about a visit to a clinic which covers the nurse or PA too. Also, the OP specified ‘whipping’, not whatever ‘various unspecified activities’ you’re invoking now. Whipping an eyeball will cause severe pain, but is also going to require serious medical attention. This is a radical change to the scenario.

Also, invoking an EMT vs a clinic, or claiming that whatever mystery thing is done doesn’t ‘necessitate’ medical attention because maybe you could live through it is just playing semantic ‘gotcha’ games, and moves the discussion away from your actual hypothetical into nitpicking your exact wording, on an OP with numerous typos, no less. I don’t really see the point in trying to discuss an already odd hypothetical if the discussion requires me to endlessly nitpick the exact wording of the OP and ignore the real topic. This is especially true when the OP includes obvious shorthand for something that would be a long and detailed conversation IRL.

Again, the problem is not that you didn’t give a graphic description of what the shoot would entail, the problem is that you gave a non-graphic description of what activities and risks shoot would entail, then radically changed the limits of what would be done mid-thread without admitting it. “Whipping,” while varied, only covers a fairly narrow range of activities, and there’s only so much risk involved with anything that qualifies as ‘whipping,’ especially if you’re limiting to something that won’t warrant a visit to a clinic. Turning it into mystery unspecified activities of intensity that might require serious medical attention but not technically a visit to a clinic because they have medical personnel doing a housecall (or maybe even require major surgery and recovery but that’s an OR and PT not an ER or clinic) is completely different.

I disagree. The scenario and psychological profile you outline in the OP makes me fairly certain her mental health is at grave risk.

The difference, here, is the absolute guarantee of suffering violent trauma. This is more akin to self-harm or attempted suicide, IMO.

Right, I agree. Having had friends in Hollywood that shot BDSM films, they are actually the safest line in porn or “sex work” to get into.

But Skald is moving the goalposts a little here, methinks. Or he doesnt know the industry.

I’ll happily admit to not knowing the industry.

Ten minutes surfing the internet, then scrubbing your history etc like crazy should fix this. :wink:
Of course, my knowledge is very dated and secondhand.