But if we take away “Og” people might have to actually be funny instead of constantly spouting years-old tired catchphrases and simpsons quotes!
That’s just not fair! Everyone, even the painfully unoriginal and unfunny, should be given the opportunity to repeat the same unfunny crap over and over again and pretending that it’s any kind of entertaining.
In my opinion, Og wouldn’t be one to send you to hell, like a metaphysically time-out. No, he’d be one to approach from arrears and give you a sound embuggering. Og is much more down to earth that way than the IPU. However, I still like the Invisible Sky Pixie.
That’s a coincidence, I also was tempted to seethe with rage in 1960. But I couldn’t. Turns out the problem was with the goggles . . . they did nothing.
See, this is something that actually bugs me about sports leagues in North America. Instead of acknowledging the success of a team that is consistently the best over the long term (the regular season), all the glory goes to whatever team combines skill with enough streaky luck over a much shorter term (the playoffs).
I love the fact that in European football (and I think South American too, but I don’t pay much attention there) the league champion for each league gets the major glory and the cup competition (or competitions) – other than the Champion’s Cup – is significant but not the prime award. Plus it generally occurs in conjunction with the season as opposed to after it. But maybe that’s just me.
Insult Og, get a plague of hockey fans. Not quite locusts, but the constant sharpening of skates gets annoying.
Ooner, someone about a month ago said this about in-jokes (paraphrased): Its’ just a thing. Its’ not like I sit at home for hitting “post” like, “ZOMG!1 I said ‘Og,’ lolz! This is gonna cost people a few keyboards.”