If any other person did this, they would be arrested for child endangerment!
Good God!! I totally missed this!! This is insane! He should be in a mental ward somewhere on very strong medications. He’s obviously a danger to others and probably himself.
That is sick. 
Don’t worry; any day now the baby will lose his looks and Jacko won’t have anything to do with him.
Aren’t there laws covering this?
Isn’t Child Protective Services authorized to take children away from those who have absolutely no business whatsoever parenting?
Before we start passing all kinds of stupid laws regulating video games, television, movies, books, comics, posters, etc. etc., shouldn’t our concern be about the children who live with DEFINITE, SEVERE danger every day of their lives?
I’ll say this much…if Michael Jackson is allowed within a hundred yards of a child ever again, it’s our laws that are pure d gone. Some people just do not know when to effin’ quit.
I wonder how many of us parents - had we been followed around with a video camera since the birth of our children - would have been caught on camera from time to time doing something which apparently endangered our child.
What Jackson did was ill-considered, reckless and potentially dangerous (none of us actually know how good a grip he had on the child - we’re all interpreting footage shot from quite a distance) but as a stand alone incident, it hardly justifies calls to have his children removed from his care.
Yes, the German child protection authorities should probably give him a stern talking to (let’s face it “showing” your child to the crowd but hiding its face with a towel is more than a little bit weird whether or not you do it on a 4th floor balcony), but I really can’t see how an incident which occured in Germany is the business of US child protection authorities.
There are plenty of reasons to be concerned about the future of Michael Jackson’s children, but I’ve yet to come across any credible reports that those children are constantly exposed to the kind of danger which would justify their removal from his care.
Oh my god, that guy defended michael jackson!
Thats actually pretty refreshing. Hell I say let the guy have kids. He’s the king of pop! They let Ozzy have kids for christsake.
Yeah, but at least Ozzie has Sharon around.
I agree with reprise, don’t you guys think you’re over-reacting maybe just a little bit?
Where do you get that?
I think my school paper hit the nail on the head.
You know about George Foreman’s kids, right?