I could have put this in GQ, but whatever the answer, i’m going to be pissed at someone. If i get one particular answer, i’ll be pissed at myself for being an idiot. If i get the another answer, i’ll be pissed at the postal employee who served me today.
So, i recently received a letter from the UK. It required me to return something by mail, and so the sender enclosed a Coupon-Réponse International, or International Reply Coupon. The coupon looks exactly like the one on this page (of course, it does not say “Specimen”). In place of “Nom du Pays” it is stamped “Grande-Bretagne,” and there is a round postal stamp (from Nottingham) in the small box on the bottom left (where the specimen says “valeur”).
Now, i’d never even seen one of these before, let alone used one, but my relatively logical mind assumed that this coupon meant that return postage had been paid by my UK correspondent, and that i could just hand over the coupon with my envelope in order to receive “free” postage to the UK.
If the postal employee who served me is to be believed, i am wrong. She told me that these are coupons purchased in the US for sending overseas, so that people overseas can send things back here for free. She insisted that the coupon i presented her had been purchased in the US, and that it could only be used by someone overseas to send a ltter back here to America. I pointed out that, given that this coupon had a stamp from a post office in Nottingham, England, it was highly unlikely that it had been purchased here in the US.
She continued to insist that this was the case, and as proof that it was an American product she pointed to the picture of the little girl and said that “only a US product would have a picture of Shirley Temple on it” (!!!) Well, the International Postal Union page that i linked to above strongly implies that all such coupons used worldwide have “Shirley Temple” on them (the girl, by the way, is not identified by name anywhere). But my postal nemesis would not be moved.
I then pointed to the back of the coupon, where it says (in six different languages) that
I pointed out that “any country of the Universal Postal Union” was a term that likely covered the United States as well as a whole bunch of other countries. She continued to insist, however, that this is a product purchased here to allow the benighted folks of other nations to send mail to America. The concept of an international union and international agreement covering and binding multiple nations seemed to completely pass her by.
So, what the fuck is going on here? Am i a moron, or is she? Is there something i’m just not getting about this system, or does she just not know her job? Help me, people!