WV_Woman... c'mon down!

ass–>donkey–>liberal–>democrat

dumbo–>elephant–>conservative–>republican

ass-liberal is the antagonym of dumbo-conservative.

:eek:

OH, I see. Okay.

That works.

I KNEW a Pit thread about WV_Woman would come up eventually. I just KNEW it! HAHA!

Holy fuck, you people are pathetic. It is taking you 3 pages to vent your dislike of a person? Get a life. If you really don’t like her comments so much, just don’t read them. To flay around in a pit thread for three pages, patting each other on the back for acting like fucktards is childish.

It’s kind of hard to ignore her when she goes about hijacking other people’s threads with her disruptive brand of bullshit, then when pressed for an explanation she leaves with a cryptic remark meant to paint her as the Grand Martyr of Oppressed Truth. If any poster ever deserved a pitting, it’s her. It’s just the Straight Dope’s own antibody system kicking in. She needs to know this board is for open-minded discussion and is not a platform for making herself feel superior to those damn queers and liberals.

And we’re still at two pages, hon.

"It is taking you 3 pages to vent your dislike of a person? "

You’ve never seen the Uekte threads, have you?

I haven’t previewed to read the rest of this so maybe she does show up again, but the first example is odd enough. She is averaging almost 12 posts per day. TWELVE!! And I don’t recall it being a bunch of post-padding "me too"s or lawn chairs either. She’s been all over GD, basically plastering herself onto that forum since she arrived.

Now I can understand that someone with only a little spare time to browse the boards might want to abstain from getting into a lengthy discussion clarifying a position. People around here can be pesky with “cite please” requests that border on the ridiculous, and other such time consuming “I demand you explain yourself and support this assertion” sort of things. If you were a casual board-dweller, you would probably just say “eh, doesn’t matter, let 'em keep asking, I don’t have the time.” But if you are averaging TWELVE posts a day, that’s just ridiculous.

:smiley: Bwahahaha! :smiley:

OK, OK. On behalf of the U.S. of A. I apologize to our Canadian brothers and sisters for the offensive comments of WVW. It’s the free speech thing, I think. We’re pretty happy with it overall, but every once in a while…

[sub]Would you be so kind as to call off the airstrike on the Baldwins? Thank you.[/sub]

Hey, I think I’m about 12 posts per day.

But I don’t think I post bullshit. Do I?

:wink:

And they are BOTH Canadian. I don’t have a bio on Paul, but he seems to be focussing on some very Canadian projects lately, so I may be speaking out of turn.

Brendan Fraser is quite certainly Canadian. At the time I was in university for a hospitality degree, his father was a high-ranking official with Tourism Canada. I had it all worked out: I was going to marry Brendan and go to work for his father. But I do believe that this line of thought is hijacking the thread a bit.

mea culpa.

Bite me. You’re about a cunt-hair less of dribbling idiot than WV_W, and have been dropping steaming loads of acrimonious bullshit all over the place. No doubt you don’t like to see her called on her stupidity- It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if you fantasized about her nightly, while masturbating into a crusty sock. What has Brutus brought to us?[ul][]If the CIA was a worth a damn these days, we would have never heard of [John Walker Lindh]. He’d be in some shallow unmarked grave in Afghanistan…[]Why should the President give a serious listen to ‘those critics’? We elect a President, not a panel of critics.[]It is so simple to NOT get AIDS, that I have zero sympathy for those who engage in risky behavior and then bemoan their fate.[](Re: Ann Coulter) Since she is not some bull-dike leftist, I know she won’t be too popular with most of the folks here, but she is quite popular among conservatives.[]I am gratefull that we have a president with enough common-sense to not lead America into the [International Criminal Court].[]Until the various terrorist-breeding peoples of the world love us or fear us, they will keep churning out terrorists. And it is far easier to make them fear us then love us.[/ul]…and on and on. Suffering Christ, man, you’re not only a moron, you’re fucking loud about it.

I didn’t want to pile on but this takes the cake.

Brutus, aka Ottto, is probably still bitter about the Pit thread done in honor of his own ignorance: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=119149

I can handle WV_Woman’s penchant for making inflammatory posts on a “hit and run” basis and refusing to defend them.

What I find less forgivable (and far more ‘creature who lives under a bridge’-type behaviour) is her posting tripe like

in a GD thread and leaving it up to other posters to correct the misinformation she is spreading.

I guess the surgeon who dealt with my ectopic pregnancy must have been incompetent as he only removed the affected fallopian tube. :rolleyes:

Lay off Brutus, at least in this thread. Yes, his views are obnoxious and occasionally racist, and he shows little if any tact. But he does defend said viewpoints. And he does have a sense of humor about them. I remember I said something about conservative nutjobs and he replied, “Why do you think we watch Red Dawn every day? To prepare!” or something along those lines. You have to give him at least a little credit for that.

Also, he does not post them day and night nonstop. Since Wednesday I’ve been sitting here mostly unable to go out or do anything because of recent surgery, and had insomnia for part of this time, and WV_Woman is still out-posting me. And she posts her stupid-ass invective in every possible forum. She could be the first person to be a dumbass in the 6 most posted-in fora.

What’s worse is that she absolutely refuses to defend any viewpoint whatsoever. She doesn’t have the grapes to come in and defend herself as an myriad respected Dopers and myself have railed on her ignorance. If she is banned she shouldn’t just have BANNED under her name. She should have IMPEDIMENT TO THE PROLIFERATION OF KNOWLEDGE under there. She is a complete and utter waste of bandwidth. WV_Woman, you are a scourge upon these boards. Go to www.freerepublic.com, where you’ll be infinitessimally more popular. But the purpose of these boards is to Fight Ignorance. You want to Fight Intelligence. You must go.

Brutus, thy name fits you.

And what’s the deal with taggert? It seems he’ll soon have his thread here as well.

Big Kahuna Burger, you’ve touched my heart.

[sup]Is it just me or does that sound like a tagline from a Heart & Stroke Foundation PSA?[/sup]

Taggert is an alledgedly witty satirist who has already been taken to the pit once for his asinine rantings (by Desert Geezer, if you’re curious). I assume that he will be taken to the pit again. And again. And again. And so on and so forth, until his eventual banning.

Oh, and Sinshine: Paul Gross has been at Stratford, recently. I believe he’s been playing the lead roll in Hamlet, or some such thing.

Hey Guin, as you pointed out, I see you are up around 12 posts per day too…but you wear them well, so to speak.

As regards taggert, I think that post that was quoted was meant to be satirical. Admittedly, the art of satire has diminished somewhat since Candide, but I don’t mind. Perhaps there’s a fine line between trolling/satire/parody, but I think we’re working that one out right now in the Pit.

As regards Brutus, I actually thought a couple of the quotes you cited from him were reasonably defensible positions. If he didn’t defend them reasonably after making them, then he suffers from the exact same thing as WV_Woman. It was right of techchick to point out that not everyone here is a leftist, I think perhaps some people get off on martyrdom.

Personally, as a relative newcomer, I’m wondering about the fate of some of these posters. I think it’s a little presumptious to predict an eventual banning, as grim spectre has done. In the past, do people who come off like this early on survive to mellow out, keep posting in the same brash and bold style, or some other alternative entirely? I wonder in a general sense of course, since I must imagine that suggesting any particular person will end up being banned is probably against somebody’s rules somewhere.