Come on, if the computers controlling the nuclear arsenal ever gain sentience, they’d direct the nukes out of the solar system. It takes way too much energy to launch into the sun.
Was our nerd hero asleep at the switch when he drew this?
I did but I’m not letting him get away with that. These sentient computers should still know that it’s better to launch out of the system, even if extra boosters are available. I demand realism in my stick-figure comics.
I’m not a rocket scientist but wouldn’t it normally be easier to launch something towards the sun than away from it? I figured gravity would make the sun the easiest place in the solar system to send something to.
There are some threads on this - here’s a fairly recent one. Essentially, the Earth is orbiting the sun at 108,000 km/h, so anything you launch will already have that velocity. To make something hit the sun, you have to counteract that, otherwise it just circles the sun in a different orbit. The escape velocity of the solar system is significantly less.
IANARS either, but no, it turns out not. Before you can drop into the sun you have to scrub off all the kinetic energy you have just from having been carried along by the Earth as it goes round the sun. Until then, gravity will no more pull your rocket in than it will pull the Earth in. And as long as you’re changing something’s kinetic energy, the figures show that it takes less of a change to pull out of the sun’s gravity well than it does to reduce it to zero (or as near as it takes to fall into the sun).
Are you suggesting that he’s taking a subtle swipe against software developers by implying they aren’t smart enough to program the AI correctly? Because I could see that.
Why even launch them into the sun? They’re nuclear weapons, which is the very definition of an object with a built-in self-destruct. Launch them into space, and then, when they are far enough away, light them off and enjoy the solar system’s most expensive fireworks show.