I doubt it. I’m not the only one who doesn’t think your OP is all that profound.
I said nothing of the sort. I simply don’t find your attempts to equate “god” and “good” remotely plausible; there’s no innate connection between the two terms. “Evil God” is not an oxymoron. And “God does not exist” is not the same thing as “Goodness does not exist”. And claiming it does is highly insulting to the unbelievers of the world, not to mention people who don’t believe in a single God.
I wasn’t wanting to dispense with the theoretical concept of the supernatural - as you say, without it, ‘mundane’ becomes meaningless. I was using ‘mundane’ to mean ‘earthly’ and ‘physical’. And suggesting that if ‘Goodness’ is a human descriptor of a particular behaviour, or aesthetic, and humans are capable of independently being good, then ‘God’ is left as a redundant and inaccurate synonym for ‘Goodness’.
Obviously when I say “all I’m left with is mundane Goodness” I’m not trying to disparage all earthly goodness, just saying that compared to the idea of an all-powerful God bestowing his Goodness on the earth, it’s a bit unremarkable…
I don’t find it to be so at all.