Just one entry: The Rolling Stones, Michael Jackson, Bruce Springsteen
Zero entries: The Who, Paul Simon, Queen, R.E.M., The Doors, The Band, solo Beatles, Elvis Presley, James Brown, Van Morrison, Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly
Meh. It’s reasonable enough to me. I don’t have any major gripes. I mean, my number one and two are “Loveless” by My Bloody Valentine and “Pet Sounds” by the Beach Boys, and the first isn’t even listed. I can deal with “Pet Sounds” at #20. “Blonde” is a colossal album, though it may not be on my own Top 10 list. I was going to say “My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy” by Kanye better be up there somewhere, and it is, at #26. When it comes to lists of the top 1% of 1% of 1%, any order is pretty much acceptable to me.
The list is the opinion of people that do not share my taste in music. That makes it a crap list to me. Only 17 of them would make it to a list of my favorite albums and it would have a lot more that 100 of them.
I agree wholeheartedly! I do own a few of the albums on the list but in my opinion, there are many more worthy musicians than have been included in this bunch. Whoever put the list together has simply written down their personal favourites, and chucked them into some kind of order.
It has a lot more recent albums than other “best albums” lists I’ve seen. Which is fair and reasonable, but there’s a lot on there in styles or genres that I don’t enjoy and don’t relate to (like rap). For example, I long ago bought a used copy of The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill (#1 on the list) on the basis of its good reviews and reputation, but I couldn’t get into it,
How do you determine the length of the emperor’s nose when no one is allowed to see the emperor? Survey every citizen and ask them how long the think they think the emperor’s nose is, add up all the numbers and divide by the number of citizens.
Heh, that’s a good way of putting it. Someone posted an article before about how Rolling Stone’s top album lists have changed as a result of younger and more diverse judges. That’s a good thing and more power to them but it also means any list like that has less real estate devoted to artists/genres I care about. It’s not even that I only want white guy music from 1965-1975, I just don’t give a shit about (for example) Kanye.
With lists like these, there always seems to be some entries that are there because people think they should be there. They don’t actually like it, or have never heard it, but they feel they’ll look biased if they don’t include it.
So some albums always end up on these lists, which them creates a self-perpetuating idea that the album is actually a good complete album. And no I’m not slamming rap or whatnot that I just don’t like.
I’ve only heard of one of those artists. Would explain that there are more hip hop/rap albums (21) than rock (18).
Come to think of it, does “album” have much relevance anymore? I mean album as in “collection”, not “those big black CDs” (as my kids called them). In a digital world where you pay for a song, does anyone care about the “b” side?
Me, I always get a division by zero error when puzzling out the ontological foundation of these lists.
At any rate, since my favorite album of all time wouldn’t finish within a googolplex of the top of these lists they are invariably pretty irrelevant to me.