Uh, no, see, some of us don’t spend our entire lives in one
place. Before I was 19, I had lived in Ohio, Massachusetts, Arizona, Virginia, Missouri, and Germany, and had visited California, Hawaii, Texas, Rhode Island, and (if you’re going to run into a Fundie somewhere) West-by-God Virginia. Never met a literalist. At least to my knowledge. Certainly in my family, who are Christian, there aren’t any.
The didn’t “get” it as in, “DId I hear that, or did I only imagine I heard it, because it’s pretty flippin’ unbelievable that someone would actually say that.”
I’ve read it, thanks. I have four different translations on the shelf behind me (KJV, NIV, RSV, Living Bible). Nowhere does it say you must have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. It says you must accept that he died to save your from your sins, pray in his name, and profess the good news to the world.
Maybe I missed it buried above, but has FoG ever said what he means by “personal relationship with JC”? In what way does it differ from other posters’ formula for salvation?
FriendofGod,
I kindly ask you to try again.
Please give me a “prophecy”.
Maybe it’ll work better than matt’s did.
Seriously. Go ahead. I will be objective.
The problem is that FoG was willing to give a vague “prophecy,” but when I asked him to give a prophecy that would be too specific to be faked, he complained that “God doesn’t do magic tricks.”
That, to me, is a good reason to class FoG with Uri Geller: he wants us to believe in superpowers, but then complains that the superpowers will vanish if you look too closely.
FoG, my original offer still stands. I have studied Christianity, and as far as I am concerned, it is completely false. There is no reason whatsoever why I would convert to Christianity (particularly your version of it) over, say, Islam.
If you could give me a specific, unfakable prophecy from God, that would demonstrate to me that of all the religions in the world, Christianity is the one that stands out as having something that the others do not. I would then give very, very serious consideration to the question of whether Christianity is true.
The terms of my challenge are quite simple. As I write this, there is a book on the desk in front of me. Name it. You claim that with faith as large as a mustard seed you can move mountains. I suggest that if you take your mission as a Christian seriously, you should use your faith to convert me.
-Ben
Seeing as FoG continues to act as though he’s the fourth part of the Trinity (yes, I know that doesn’t make sense - see any posting by FoG to understand why), I will, from this moment forth, refer to him as “F[sub]ourth[/sub]o[sub]f[/sub]G[sub]od[/sub].”
That particular analogy is indeed weak, but it’s too fun sounding to pass up ;). Besides, you can get the point without it being a perfect analogy.
A better analogy might be: suppose you’re a contract worker and you have a contract job with one company that lasts 3 months. Walking into their building to do your contract work doesn’t mean they are now your employer. Yes you’re in their building, participating, even contributing something to their cause: but you haven’t switchedemployers. The employer is still the company you work for that sends you out to do contract work. Walking into a church doesn’t mean you’ve switchedmasters to Jesus Christ.
Now, here’s one I simply must ask about. Cervaise, I originally said this:
You responded with:
So … when the entire point of this paragraph is to say that you can’t judge who is and isn’t a Christian based on outward appearance, I’d like to see how you drew your conclusion that this contained ‘judgmental arrogance’.
Pariah … thank you for quoting Mt 7:21-23. That was one of several passages I had in mind.
tracer said:
Yes. You’ve never read 1st and 2nd Whopper? jenkinsfan said:
Well I admitted my prophesy goof when it happened way back when, and as for ‘shaking the dust’ … I probably should. This doesn’t appear to be accomplishing anything. I will probably stick around another day or two at least.
If you’ll look at some of my most recent replies, you’ll see that I basically agree. If you want to be really technical, the only person on the planet I’m 100% sure is a Christian is me. But that doesn’t preclude common sense assumptions and guesses. If someone SAYS to me “I hate God and have no desire to do anything with him”, am I really “judging” him by saying he’s not a Christian, or just using common sense? There’s about a 0.00000001% chance he’s faking saying this for some reason. If someone says to me that they love Jesus Christ with all their heart and soul, and their life matches up … what’s the chances that they’re involved in a conspiracy to fool everyone into thinking they’re saved? Slim to none, though I suppose it is possible. And again, those in the “gray area” you just have to say ‘I dont know’.
I would have to disagree. There ARE outside evidences (not proofs, just evidences). Jesus outright said there were. Here are a few (emphasis mine):
I could go on but you get the drift. So I think you can observe and use common sense, without just drawing 100% outright conclusions.
I can’t, which is why, as Jesus says above, actions have to be observed. Actions don’t give proof, but they do give evidence. Monty … I will momentarily break my silence toward you with one comment: your growing hysterical rant against me has become the most entertaining part of this thread to me! Please don’t stop Ben … on the other hand seems to be in a more pleasant state now. You said:
Great question! It’s not that you ‘need a personal relationship with Jesus to get to heaven’. It’s that you need to be cleansed and forgiven of your sins in order to get to heaven AND have a personal relationship with Jesus. In other words, heaven, having a personal walk with God, and actually many OTHER things are the benefits of “getting saved” or “born again” or pick your cliche.
In other words, having a relationship with God is one of the GOALS, just as much as getting to heaven is! In fact, more accurately, having a relationship with God is THE goal, and heaven is nothing more than an extension of the relationship that begins while you’re still on earth.
Just to clarify: a Christian is someone who has a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ. If you want to expand that definition, you could say: A Christian is someone who has a personal relationship with God because they have accepted forgiveness of their sins through Jesus Christ, and they will spend eternity with God forever.
Believe it or not, I do fully understand that there are many people in the USA who use the term ‘Christian’ loosely. Some people think just being born in America practically makes you a Christian! (Thats a slight exaggeration but you get the point ;)). But, as I believe that the Bible definition is the correct one, I use it deliberately.
How and where am I switching? I’ve been consistantly using the Bible definition. Show me an example if I’ve used the so called ‘sociological’ definition. Your last line most accurately comes close to reflecting my thinking. Most believers are pretty outspoken about their beliefs, and there are some who love to take potshots at them for it.
Thanks … I think ;). I’m still reading …
Maybe I should have explained my objection to ‘The Rapture’ better. It’s not that her dogma differed from mine: it’s that she never exhibited any outside signs that she had a true relationship with God. If anything, she gave all outward signs that she and those in her cult were more than a little bit nuts. Waiting in the desert for the rapture to come? Give me a break! Now, to be fair, you’ll recall that I did allow for the possibility that she was a true believer who was just very very deceived.
As for the whole homosexuality thing, I did indeed say what Ben quoted. In fact, I would say the same thing about any sinful lifestyle. So how does that fit with what I’m saying? Easy: you can’t know what’s in a person’s heart. If you know someone who says they love God and is a practicing homosexual, that’s a contradiction. But who knows the context? As I said earlier in the thread, it could be that God is dealing with other areas of their growth at the moment and He’ll get to that area in His timing. Ie, they don’t realize that what they’re doing is a contradiction. Or, maybe God has confronted them on it and they have refused to listen and they are in blatant rebellion. Who can know?
Again, common sense enters into the picture. You can’t know but you can observe. For example, if you are friends with someone in this situation and they tell you they are struggling with this sin and want to be free from it, why should I not believe them?
I think those who believe that homosexuality is not a sin are tragically mistaken, but believing that doesn’t mean you aren’t saved. As I said before, Christians can be wrong and still be Christians. quixotic78 said:
You will not find that specific phrase anywhere in the Bible that I know of. That specific phrase is more of a late 20th century cliche to describe what the Bible says in a simple nutshell. But if you read the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation you’ll see that one of the key themes throughout is God and man in fellowship with each other. It was perfect fellowship in the Garden of Eden, then when we screwed things up, the whole rest of the Bible was about trying to restore that fellowship! The NT is about God restoring that fellowship through Jesus Christ. Read John 14-17 especially in which Jesus focuses on the fact that He now can call us His friends (hence my username :D).
I have actually heard a believer talk like this as well. I’m sure they mean well, but what they’re doing is projecting what they experienced onto others and expecting everyone to have the exact same experience. Not everyone records down the date and time that they got right with God. I know one person who told me it happened sort of gradually over the course of a week.
Allworthy said:
I understand what you’re saying, ie trying to cut down on the confusion. To be honest, I deliberately usually avoid the words you mentioned because they sound too super-spiritual to me! I’ll consider your suggestion though.
LOL, good point! Actually I’ve never liked the ‘accept Jesus as your personal savior’ phrase, simply because it’s become SUCH a cliche that it’s almost meaningless. I suppose the same might could be said for ‘personal relationship with Jesus’. Maybe it’s time we American Christians found a new and fresh way to describe things, eh?
That’s all I have time for now, I’ll try to catch up some more tomorrow more than likely. By the way, on my last post I was trying to use a smilie I’ve seen on other boards, : eek : (without spaces) which shows a guy with bug out eyes, but apparently it doesnt work here. So that’s what the :eek: was all about! catch you later.
In defending his definiton of Christian, FoG issues the challenge
In the original post to this very thread, FoG wrote:
Wouldn’t most people understand this to mean that Carman is an artist whose work deals primarily in Christian themes, rather than that Carman is an artist who has a personal relationship with Jesus? FoG also describes films and books as Christian, even though as a matter of common sense non-persons cannot have a personal relationship with Jesus.
Hmph. Is it really possible to overstate the spiritual significance of a personal relationship with JC?
FoG wrote:
I’ve got it!
Adherent of the belief system of the Christian religion = Christian
Christian enjoying a personal relationship with Jesus Christ = Christian++
Let me know when I can expect the call from the Nobel folks regarding the dynamite money.
I’ve always preferred programing in Objective Christian, rather than Christian++. The whole “virtual salvation” mechanism in Christian++ seems sooooo tacked on to the language as a hack. And don’t even get me started on
“templates”!
One thing I don’t understand. FoG says that you are not a Christian just because you act like a Christian(churches and McDonalds), while at the same time he says he can tell if someone is a true Christian by watching how they act (professes a love for Jesus, attends church, lives by the Bible). Isn’t there an obvious contradiction here?
I’ve been really concerned about what is happening to the Gospel message in this thread – with FoG (I think unintentionally) saying that it depends on believing as I believe, and everybody else jumping every contradictory point that he makes in the process of attempting to clarify what he’s said.
:::hands FoG a towel to dry the saliva off his feet, from when they were in his mouth :::
One long Bible quote (Luke 15 in full) following. Please don’t skip over it, because it’s important to resolving the mess this thread has gone through.
I am not, personally, particularly interested in whom FoG defines as a Christian, or why. I am quite interested in whom God defines as a Christian. And there’s a series of important messages in this passage that speak to me:
[ul]
[li]The younger son (traditionally “the Prodigal Son”) “wants it now” He’s not content to wait for the Father to give it to him, but demands it immediately.[/li][li]Inevitably, he screws up.[/li][li]He comes back home, admitting he’s made a mistake.[/li][li]He’s welcomed with open arms, in love, and his return is celebrated.[/li][li]The older brother is peeved about this.[/li][li]He figures that “keeping the rules” is what matters.[/li][li]The father bawls him out for this attitude.[/li][li]The father stresses that love – his love for his son – is what matters.[/li][/ul]
In short, theological errors are forgiveable, sin is forgiveable, inerrantism is not necessary, “having a personal relationship” is only quasi-necessary (one assumes one loves whom one knows), God’s love is available to all his children – no matter what.
Certainly, FoG, if someone says this to you, you are justified in assuming that that person is not a Christian…
and in this case, you are entirely justified in assuming that this person is a Christian. I’m with you so far. My question is this: Imagine that someone comes to you and says, “Sure, I’m a Christian. I’ve been baptised. I believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God and that he was born on Earth to redeem our sins on the cross. I go to church regularly and try to lead a Christian life. I disagree with you on a few minor points, though. I don’t believe that homosexuality is a sin. I do believe in evolution. I don’t believe that the bible is inerrant. I believe that much of the bible is allegory and that its many translations through the ages mean that much of it is colored less by God than by the culture and prejudices of the men who translated it.” Would you consider this person to be a Christian?
The arrogance is the subtle implication that you have the right or obligation to judge who is and isn’t a Christian at all.
You’ve said over and over that what really matters is in one’s heart. And yet you’ve also said over and over that just because somebody has all the outward signs of Christianity, that doesn’t mean that person is a “true” Christian; it’s impossible to tell what’s in that person’s heart, which is what really matters. You seem to be making this distinction as a means of dismissing and disqualifying Christians who you find inconvenient to your rather narrow definition of what Christianity means, by establishing a basis by which you can say “that one doesn’t count.”
It seems to me a true Christian wouldn’t be so obsessed with what’s in other people’s hearts. It seems to me a true Christian would be primarily focused on what is in his own heart. It seems to me to be the height of ignorance and arrogance for a self-professed Christian to be spending so much time extrapolating his own experience onto the lives of other people and using his own belief system as the ultimate objective yardstick of what makes a Christian a “real” Christian.
And it seems to me that this is exactly what you are doing.
… I’m going to respond to these last few posts, and then I’d like to try to wrap this up. It’s obviously not accomplishing a whole lot of anything. My whole point for returning to the SDMB was to let everyone know about the LB movie, and then I ended up promo-ing Judgment which, to me, is a much better movie. Somehow it ended up in a debate over prophesy, who is a real Christian, and harassment in the media (???) Why does this always happen?
Anyway, let me try to respond to these most recent posts:
quixotic78 … without going blow by blow through your post, let me just repeat what I said yesterday, which is that the term ‘personal relationship’ appears nowhere in the Bible that I know of, but that doesn’t mean the concept isn’t all throughout the Bible. I agree that, as James says, faith without works is dead. Works is like the evidence of your faith. It doesn’t “get you saved”, but it can “prove” that you’re saved.
Ben … you listed alternatives on what I believe. I can simplify it: virtually every Christian I’ve ever known believes the Bible to be 100% the Word of God. It’s that simple. In fact, the only ones I’ve ever met that didn’t think this (at least that I can think of) are on this board.
Flymaster said:
Ahhhh … or, it’s possible he just grew up in a neighborhood where there were few or no Christians? Do you really think that it’s that impossible?
Icerigger asked:
I don’t know. Not very impressive, I know, but I really have no idea. All I know is that according to the passages referred to earlier in this thread, there will be “many” who think they should go to heaven who will not. pldennison said:
Well, I’ve moved around a few times myself: Texas and Georgia in addition to Alabama. I guess you’re right - it might be less where you live as much as who you hang out with in the places you live in.
As I said earlier on this page, having a relationship with God and heaven for eternity are the results of salvation. They are the reason you get saved, not how you get saved.
minty green said:
Not sure how to describe/define it: it’s a relationship unlike any human relationship you can have. It’s soooo much deeper. I mean, you’re relating to someone who can see right through you into every single thing inside your heart … things even YOU can’t see … and this person still loves you unconditionally. It’s pretty mindblowing.
Other aspects: you never have to experience loneliness again, because He’s always there. When you go through a horrible tragedy, He is there to comfort you. When you don’t know how to handle a situation, He is there to help guide you into wisdom that you don’t even have. I could go on and on, but you get the idea. vanilla and Ben … you’ve got to be kidding me! Let me be honest, if I were truly a prophet and was extraordinarily accurate … I would never use it in this way. It appears to me that you are looking for a loophole for faith, but there is none. You cannot demand or expect from God, via any vehicle be it prophesy or something else, that He “prove” Himself to you. There will always have to be an element of faith. Allworthy said:
Well truthfully, I tend to think of it as the 2nd example you gave: someone who has a personal relationship with Jesus … and yes, that affects his worldview when he makes music. As for “Christian films and books”, what I mean is simply books written from a Christian worldview perspective. Dr. Lao … hi! You always show up when I’m about to wrap up, just like before ;).
Good question, and let me clarify. The problem is in the first half of the sentence: “You are not a Christian just because you act like a Christian”. That is true, but that is more of a point for individuals to take to heart within themselves. Actions do tend to point toward someone being a believer or not being one, but they aren’t foolproof. You can’t know 100% for sure. The point of saying that you can go to church your whole life and not be a Christian is a point that gets made a lot to cause those who ARE in that position to sit up, take notice, and realize where they’re at. I hope that makes sense.
Polycarp … hey you can never hear the good ole Prodigal Son too much! Awesome. I love your bulleted summary. I’ll only comment on this one point:
Exactly! This story illustrates the point. He was off on his own and returned to a loving Father. Perhaps I should amend the descriptive phrase and say, “having a LOVING personal relationship with God”, just to clarify. Jess, you asked:
Sure! I think they’re wrong on every count as far as the issues you cited, but that doesn’t make them unsaved. All it requires is having a loving relationship with a loving God through Jesus Christ. (Hey I like this amended version!)
Okay … I’m caught up! :eek: That never happens! I’ll stick around to see the responses to this segment of the thread, but I’m about ready to wrap it up. It’s been an interesting month or so that I’ve been back, or however long it’s been.
You mean that’s all there is to the “personal relationship” thing you’ve been going on and on about to distinguish between real and pseudo-Christians? Jeepers, that’s pretty weak–I was expecting actual conversations with the Big Guy and being on His listserv, or something else along those lines.
I’d venture to say that 99% of all self-professed Christians have exactly what you describe as a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, FoG, even in the most liberal churches in the land. Good lord, that’s the whole point of being a Christian, isn’t it? And that makes me wonder whether your “personal relationship” criterion is primarily a cover for your doctrinal differences with non-fundamentalist Christians.