Again - not a citizen. My Greeen Card isn’t even green. What a rip.
A common problem is distrust. The pro-side distrusts the anti-side, and vice-versa. Within the pro-side the anti-hunting side and pro-hunting sides are also in conflict (I’m moderately but not rabidly anti-hunting, FTR).
My cousin Clay. Best shot I ever saw. I once walked off a hundred paces with a beer can, and he put a round right through the middle, first shot. Got a deer at twelve, put the shot right be behind the front haunch, straight through the heart. Deer didn’t even flinch, just dropped like a puppet who’s strings had been cut. I remember him staring at the deer while all of our uncles gathered round and pounded him on the back and shoulders. He just stared.
Damndest thing. He could still hit just about anything he could see. Open sight, of course, 'scopes were for people we had names for but had never met any. Went out with the uncles to the deer lease maybe a dozen times, never got one. Always missed. Like I said, damndest thing…
Sorry, I’m slow today. How is that effectively turning themselves in? Did they carjack a car to go shoot up a police station or something?
Your first sentence alone is sufficient, given the evidence. And it’s, sadly, not only today. :rolleyes:
Yeah, thats what I figured. You were hyperventilating and making shit up again.
You have strong beliefs and they do not line up with the facts. When confronted by your ignorance, instead of adjusting your beliefs to line up with the facts you choose to insult your enlighteners. You must be a Republican.
Oh, no, you didn’t!
Gawdammm, boy - the Tsarnaevs could have stayed in hiding, escaped somewhere quietly, forced LE to find them the old-fashioned way, which could have included tracing taggants if they’d been present. But no, they came out, killed a cop, carjacked a guy, etc. Yes, it was in the news, too. That’s “turning themselves in”.
You sad, sick fool.
You realize that if you are the only one that thinks is obvious (or even true) then you may be foolong yourself by living in a world of manufactured facts. You must be a Republican.
Now you’re not even trying to be coherent. :rolleyes:
That’s the most redickuless thing you’ve posted in this thread. :smack:
So, RTF, what about it? It’s now pretty clear that the explosives used to build the bombs were extracted from fireworks, and the NRA has never taken a position opposing taggants in fireworks.
Would you now agree that your OP is convincingly debunked, and the NRA had nothing whatsoever to do with the lack of taggants at the scene?
In light of subsequent developments, in my view it’s now much clearer that they did, in fact, use fireworks. If it ever was unclear.
Do you disagree?
I’m just saying that you’re the only one that seems to think that these guys “effectively turned themselves in” and you have divorced yourself from reality so much that you could be mistaken for a Republican.
He’s also the only one who seems to think there was no forensic evidence available before they “effectively turned themselves in” despite the fact that video and stills of the two were broadcast all over the place.
Then he has the nerve to say that I never post anything that’s accurate!
John, only a fucking moron could read anything I posted that way. :rolleyes:
Grow the hell up.
Oh, you’re right in a sense. I forgot what you had actually written, which is even more stupid than my paraphrase:
The police had video of them as suspects, so there was excellent forensic evidence that could have led to them. We now know that one of their friends even recognized them from that forensic evidence. It would have only been a short period of time before the police had names and addresses, since these guys were well known in the community.
Why do you think that no one is rushing to your defense here? It’s because what you posted was idiotic, that’s why.
What part of “grow the fuck up” do you not understand?
This from the person who was calling me “doggy”?
You never did tell us what little piss-ant sort of point you were waiting to make, did you?