If you know me, you know I’ll defend people if I think there’s any defense. I see none here. You did not know anything about what you were talking about. You were factually wrong, and you keep on trying to claim you weren’t because you didn’t know better. That still makes you wrong.
And it’s still stupid to post medical advice without at least looking it up. It’s a really bad Dunning Kruger effect. Smart people try to compensate for that.
If its serious, sure. If someone says they think they have an ulcer, I’ll chime in with a joke or nothing at all. But if someone says its seems like a harmless burn and it doesn’t even hurt, then I’m as qualified as anybody to give advice.
Maybe I’m being presumptuous here and this can turn out bad for me, but let’s try it anyways.
Hey, running coach, Canadjun, Velocity, DCnDC, which one of you guys are actually doctors? And I don’t mean simply have an MD, I mean that you have been trained specifically to deal with burns. (please not all of you…)
Or maybe we can just dispense with the notion that only doctors are qualified to give medical advice on message boards. There are a lot of smart people here, apparently I’m not one of them, lol, but lots of them have information on things that are not their trained specialty. I do too, just not about burns 
I’ve never denied I was factually wrong. But I deny that I didn’t have the ability to give advice. As I’ve said over and over again, if you don’t know you don’t know something, then you can’t know you’re not qualified to give advice on it. I didn’t know I had to know about exactly what a 3rd degree burn was to give advice on what may be a small and harmless burn, therefore I was perfectly fine in giving advice on what I think it is.
Serious medical issues, sure, I agree with you 100%. But not seemingly small ones. Or will everyone ignore my example about the splinter?
running coach, Canadjun, Velocity and DCnDC all said “go to a doctor”. You said “don’t go to a doctor”. That is the fundamental difference.
Incidentally, I’m not even all that worked up about this specific instance; I’m not entirely sure I believe the OP of the thread in question anyway (who signs up for a random website two days after an injury to ask medical questions? Why not go to, I dunno, WebMD?). I just find your aggressive stupidity irritating.
running coach also gave his medical opinion: “Either you didn’t burn it that badly or you have third degree burns.”
Canadjun explained what a 3rd degree burn was.
Velocity claimed information on a burn’s infection properties.
And DCnDC gave his advice on what a medical treatment would be.
I think if they aren’t doctors, you should ask them to take their suggestions and speculation all back, you know, in the interest of not looking like an assoholish jackass. And Velocity didn’t say go to a doctor.
Do you understand the difference between “information” and “advice”?
The crux of your post at me in that other topic was that I didn’t know what I was talking about and therefore shouldn’t post a suggestion. Are you now saying that if I had only given erroneous information, you would have been fine with that? Let’s try that!
“Allison27, given what I know of your burn, it sounds like it is perfectly safe and not a real injury. Real injuries should hurt, so if it doesn’t hurt, there is no need to worry about it”
Now fachverwirrt, you respond to that! Go! 
What, precisely, is so horrible about the prospect of saying, “I was very wrong, and now that I have learned how my error arose, I will no longer make similar mistakes?”
I know a good bit about the law. But you’ll notice that my habit, in answering questions about civil law, is to note at the outset that this is an area in which I don’t have strong expertise, that I defer to those more in the know than I; criminal law is my speciality.
And that, in an area in which my expertise certainly exceeds a lay public level of understanding.
I’d imagine that if you had said, “Admittedly I am not a doctor and have no medical training, but it seems to me that . . . .” the criticism would be largely blunted. I think – and I could be wrong 
– that the criticism here is fueled by your aggressive defense of your exercise of advice when you didn’t know enough to know you didn’t know enough.
Hey, I’m an MD.
I’ve done multiple rotations in different burn units during my surgical residency, over and above the baseline. I did the same in medical school, too. I strongly considered fellowship training in burn surgery, but didn’t end up going that route.
YogSothoth, you are one stupid fuck.
The exact words I used were
See that word there? “Advice”. You, know, the exact word I just used in the post you’re trying to evade.
Yeah, that one.
Now allow me to expound: there is a difference between “correct information, paired with advice to consult an actual expert in the subject matter” and “dumbfuck advice based on profound ignorance which could be cured by 15 seconds on Google.”
No, you’re not. You behaved as an utter and total idiot, and you’re just making it worse by continuing to do so.
Because, like everyone’s been ignoring, I did say I was wrong, I did admit to speaking without reading the whole topic, but everyone’s pretending like I told the OP to pour beer on it and staple some band-aids on it. I ask you, what is wrong with saying “Yog was wrong, but he didn’t know that he would be wrong, so he spoke sincerely based on what he knew. He may have ignorance, but its been fought”?
And that is a perfectly fine way of posting, but you choose to do that. Do you only choose to talk in legal topics, since you are not trained in, for example, medicine, or relationships, or the economy? Each one of us has information we know on other subjects besides the one we’re most familiar. It is never wrong to go into a topic, knowing you’re not an expert, but participating based on what you know. If you’re wrong, other people will point it out. If you’re not, then what you say can still be beneficial. I’m not going to limit myself only to threads that I’m trained in just like you’re not going to limit yourself in to law topics.
And I have said as much. In this topic, I speculated that the reason why I’m getting some shit is because I responded to an poster being an total asshole with assholerly. I totally admit that and am actually quite proud of fighting his shitpost with my shitpost. Now imagine too, that fachverwirrt said “You’re wrong about burns, OP should still see a doctor because it could mean a deadening of the nerves and still require treatment”, I would not have responded to him as I did
Sorry, you’re not a debate coach, you are not qualified to judge my debates on this thread. Please only respond if you’re qualified, which you clearly are not
I’m not trying to evade the word, I’m saying its irrelevant. Like I said, the crux of your objection was that my advice was wrong. If it had been right, you would not say “Are you a doctor? Even if your advice was right, you should not be giving it”. Therefore, you are trying to frame the argument in a way that supports your poorly thought out objection. I was wrong, that’s why you’re upset. Did you tell any of the other posters not to give advice or information? No, because they were right. You didn’t like that I was wrong and copped an attitude and now you’re crying because you can’t handle someone being an ass back to you.
By the way, I’ve ignored the rest of your post again. I scanned your post for the gist of it and found enough that I need to respond. The rest of your post doesn’t matter
No, I’m defending myself from a completely moronic attack with no basis
Yes, weirdly, I’m less bothered by people giving correct advice than people giving idiotic advice. Huh.
Anyway, secure in the knowledge that YogSothoth (who thinks it would be super awesome if there were a a big earthquake, because fear of death is hilarious) thinks I’m a moron, I’m going to bed.
In my opinion, that response would ignore your reaction, a reaction which does not suggest your ignorance which has been fought. You continue to defend and express pride in your bravery for “contributing,” merely because although ignorant, you didn’t know you were ignorant.
In other words, your ignorance might have been fought on third degree burns, but it remains active on the subject of posting from ignorance. Your ignorance is engaged in aggressive self-defense.
Well, it’s making you look fucking stupid, fyi.
Not to worry then, since I wasn’t judging your debate style. I was judging whether or not you are a stupid fuck.
This is a blistering retort.
So close! C’mon, you all know what I want to hear…
Do you remember handy?
Look man, I tried my best.
But all I can say is if that wasn’t good enough for you, well, no skin off my back.
Would you say he’s displaying full thickness or only partial thickness?