So Canned Mayhem is not part of the entertainment? I thought he was reminiscing with the gang, reliving the glory days with he who shall not be named, albeit poorly.
Dude, you’re not doing it right. Try using some SCIENCE! (Bitches), and come back when you have data.
Predictably of course, instead of trying to answer any of these questions, everyone will just attack the source or make snarky comments about my masturbation techniques or call me a troll.
Seems to be a common theme here. BELIEVE WHAT I BELIEVE OR I WILL CRY ABOUT IT!!!1111
That reminds me of way back in 1985, when we had a 8th grade gifted eduction team creative problem solving competition in which global warming was the theme (see it’s not just something that Al Gore invented in 2005). The first step or the procedure was to define the problem using the sentence “In what way might we…”. Most teams said something like “In what way might we reduce CO2”, or “In what way might we cool the planet”. Our team proposed “In what way might we use global warming to make a profit”. Our solutions involved buying up land in Siberia and get into the dike building business. For some reason this solution didn’t seem to go over too well with the judges.
I’m sick of this global spin reversal misconception!
He didn’t change the direction of the earth’s spin. He went so fast that he was traveling backwards in time, which from his perspective (and the audience’s) made it look like the spin was reversed. It was all perfectly in accordance with the laws of physics.
You are aware that current projections call for a sea level raise of 801 feet right? I know, I have a cite but I’ll just argue with myself for another 1500 posts before producing it.
I’ll point out how wrong you are, and insult you several times to boot.
The only cites I have, though, are misquoted, out of context, flagrantly distorted, or, you know, fiction, but since I am relatively articulate, and state my argument using strong language, I assert that I have won the argument and that you, sir, are a toady, buffoonish, lick-spittle of some undocumented theory I feel strongly opposed to, but cannot clearly articulate.
Now, now, as we’ve recently learned, back in 2007 a conservative columnist with no known scientific credentials posed ten questions based on a garbled understanding of some stuff he read in a book by Bill Bryson, and since no one here could be arsed to come up with a point-by-point rebuttal in the past hour or so, the whole global warming house of cards has permanently and irrevocably collapsed.
It appears that the judges had pre-determined the only acceptable results of their “creative problem solving” competition. Actual creative problem solving was not permitted.