I’ll guarantee that California will receive higher than average rainfall next year. Will you bet that California will receive average or less than average rainfall next year?
Before it tumbles into the sea?
That’ll be the day I go back to…
You misread. The second underlined word is “through.”
In other words, “Waaaaah!! Your calling me an ignorant shit-flinger just because I keep ignorantly flinging shit is so hateful and mean! You’re only going to alienate people with these tactics, you know!”
Just go on talking, doorhinge. The more you keep ignorantly flinging shit, and the more we keep explaining the facts that your flung shit is attempting to obscure, the more “skeptics and fence-sitters” are going to realize that it’s quite reasonable for us to call you an ignorant shit-flinger.
Dude. It has already been pointed out to you that 75% of the public agrees with the scientific consensus re: AGW (and not just your silly point about the ice age).
As for “man-made-CO2-is-evil laws”, are you unaware of the ITC?
If that law doesn’t directly address man-made CO2, I don’t know what would. And it has been around for so long that it is going to partially expire in 2016.
You are doing a terrible job 
Hahahaha. I see you’ve resorted to another stupid lie about Greenland’s location. At least you’re consistent.
I’ll let others decide…
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=724652&page=2
… Oh well, what do you know, they already decided that you were really stupid then, and now.
(post shortened)
According to your link -
When: System must be placed in service between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2012. Certain geothermal and open- or closed- loop biomass systems qualify through December 31, 2013.
The ITC appears to be a one-time only tax credit for renewable energy sources. It sounds like it was another effort by the government to encourage investment in energy. What renewable energy source did you qualify for?
Which agency will you use to determine the average annual rainfall of California?
Hahahaha. Who is “they” and why do you consider them important? Haters gotta hate. That’s what they do.
Well, besides all the others in the message board, Colibri is a scientist. And so it goes for almost all scientists and most governments they do not mind you at all…
And yes, everyone can see that you are dumb.
Doorhinge, you’re a complete fucking moron.
Hey, part of Greenland (about a fifth of it) is below the Arctic Circle. So doorhinge is only 80% a moron.
You can pick, as long as it’s not Fox News.
We don’t hate you. We pity you. Like a developmentally delayed opossum.
That’s the kindest thing anybody’s ever said about him. But I must disagree. If you look at the distribution and thickness of the Greenland ice sheet (which was the context of the conversation) well over 90% of its ice mass is fully in the Arctic. So at a minimum doorhinge must be at least 90% moron. But since this came up before about a year and a half ago, and he still hasn’t learned where Greenland is (I’d love to know where he thinks it is!), I think a 100% moron award is in order just for that alone.
You keep offering the bet. You’re the one who is trying to convince me to buy what you’re selling. I’ve already said no. In case you haven’t heard - No means no.
It’s my position that your side doesn’t possess the skillset to convince non-believers, skeptics, deniers, and fence-sitters that your version of global warming is the correct version. This is your chance to convince me that you can convince me.
People have decided. You’re just pissed/frustrated/depressed that you can’t convince everyone to buy what you’re selling.
(post shortened)
Ice cream? Are you suggesting that ice cream creates global warming? Or do you believe that ice cream creates CO2?
The vast majority of climate scientists agree AGM is real. Many, many governments and private businesses (including freaking Exxon) also accept that this is the case. Polar bears, walruses, seals … all sorts of arctic animals have changed their behaviors due to changes in the sea ice. But not you … and the entirety of your argument for doing so appears to be “Nuh-uh!”
So apparently you’re dumber than a walrus. That’s not our fault.