Here’s another one that is about as “mini” as they come, but still irks me. Every year, some people I know throw a pool party over the Memorial Day weekend. It’s become a huge event, with sponsors, hundreds of attendees, etc. Food and drink are provided (although people are encouraged to bring their own) and it’s a big party.
Well, this year, the two hosts decide to make it a true fundraiser, requiring a $20 minimum donation at the door (in the past, it was “suggested”). The charity in question is AIDS-related - encouraging education and prevention, as well as putting resources to those with it.
The thing is, these parties have a storied, well-known history of what transpires when the sun goes down and the crowd starts to thin out - basically, a bacchanal celebration where safe sex is not commonly practiced, and the hosts are well-known to have such parties throughout the course of the year.
I made the comment that there was irony present in having bareback orgies at your AIDS fundraiser. Most people agreed with me, except for one person. His arguments ranged from “the hosts are nice guys” to “we need to support the barebacking community” to “don’t be mean and stereotype.” I was then told that “at least they are doing something to raise money” and I affirmed my position that, while that was true (and a noble effort), the nighttime activities of the fundraiser seem to act contrary to the event’s intent.
I in no way was calling the hosts or participants “mean names” (his words) or anything of the sort. I was merely pointing out that there was some hypocrisy in having (and encouraging) bareback sex at an event to raise funds for AIDS / HIV prevention. I tried everything in my power to make this person understand - asking if it makes sense for the American Lung Association to have an event at a cigar lounge, complete with complimentary Cubans at the end of the event, and others chimed in to support me, giving other arguments / defenses for my sentiment.
Finally, the other person just said he couldn’t be in a discussion where people were being “mean”, and left the exchange - essentially “taking his ball and going home.” Granted he was the one dissenter out of a dozen or so, but… his stubborn ignorance was just so frustrating. There were times where he was just so blissfully blind to the logic that it had me questioning my thinking.I just wanted to grab him by the shoulders and ask him how he doesn’t see the irony.
It’s the reason I stay out of certain topics on this board.