No, I admit that people who are really stoned are less likely to wantto drive. The emprical data (which remains undisputed) does not show that they are actuially any more dangerous than un-stoned people if they do drive. Calling me a retard doesn’t refute the scientific facts.
The data seems to suggest that, but I think the difference is probably too marginal to be significant. You asked if we “should insist” that they smoke before their routes. We should not insist, no.
Once again, this is a content-free post, devoid of any substantive rebuttal. You should at least try to mix in some actual arguments with the ad hominems once in a while.
Strength, sister. I went through this too. It’s liberating, once you make it through. You’re just a beautiful phoenix, rising from the ashes of Dio’s credibility.
So you admit that you’ve driven while you were drunk, but people who smoke pot (even if they don’t drive while high) are somehow stupid? Mmmmkay.
:rolleyes:
(And just to head it off, no, I’m not a pothead, I’ve never even smoked pot in my life. So that dog won’t hunt.
You’ve already been proven wrong on THAT one, dumbass.