treis, it certainly seems to me that he embraces those tactics, if only implicitly. Of course, according to him, it’s my fault, because obviously, my self-image is completely the fault of bad habits I learned as a child. So, of course, whatever pain I feel is my own fault. Which is the reasoning of an inquisition torturer. The situations are not 100% identical, of course, no analogy is going to be an exact match - but, frankly, any reasoning that advocates pain and psychological torture in pursuit of its goals is evil, and not fun evil, like Scylla’s.
And I’ve yet to see one person offer any argument why report cards are secure communications. We’ve had people question the claims that they are secure, but the closest claim to security was made by OxyMoron, and I’m afraid that doesn’t really stand up to the counter-claims by the teachers who have posted on this topic agreeing that report cards are not secure.
And what you, and some nameless others, can’t seem to recognize is that my opposition is based on two things: putting this information on report cards, and questions about how effectively the schools will do this measurement. I’m not claiming that some kind of measurement to determine at-risk children shouldn’t be made. I’m not saying that there isn’t a logical reason for this to be done through or by the schools. I’m not denying the adverse health effects of obesity.
All I’m adamant about is keeping this information private. Which you, and several other posters, have waffled all over the place about, with claims that report cards are private, then that obesity isn’t exactly a secret, then that even though it isn’t a secret the information still has to be sent to the parents, 'cause they may have blinded themselves to the facts.
Oh, and Bill H., way to avoid answering the question I actually hoped you’d answer. 