The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2002, 02:31 PM
furnishesq furnishesq is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
How do we know Budda was enlightend?

Before I am accused of posting on the wrong board. . .

1) I am not debating what "enlightned" means

2) For this question only , I am assuming there was a Budda who claimed to be enlightned.

3) I am asking those who know a little bit about Buddism doctrine how that doctrine states Budda proved that he received true enlightenment. Did he just say he did or did he prove it in some way?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 08-27-2002, 03:30 PM
DrMatrix DrMatrix is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: New York State of Mind
Posts: 3,299
Did Budda have the Budda-nature?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2002, 04:01 PM
CarnalK CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
In Buddhist thought an "enlightened" person can only be truly recognized by another enlightened person. In the Pali Canon(considered the most ancient of surviving Buddhist texts) there are many examples where Siddartha Gautama pointed the way for others to become enlightened and these people held the Buddha to be enlightened and to have "shown them the way" so to speak.

So it comes down to: we know the Buddha was enlightened because it says so in the accounts of his life.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2002, 04:50 PM
h.sapiens h.sapiens is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Isn't this kind of like asking: How do we know Jesus was the Messiah? or how do we know Mohammed was a prophet? At some point, it all comes down to faith.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2002, 05:34 PM
CarnalK CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Of course in Buddhism you are not really required to have "faith" in the Buddha(outside of Pure Land Buddhism), merely in the idea that enlightenment is possible. Buddhism is meant to be a method of enlightenment not an act of worship.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2002, 06:38 PM
Captain Amazing Captain Amazing is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 22,038
Quote:
Originally posted by DrMatrix
Did Budda have the Budda-nature?
Mu
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2002, 10:41 PM
bibliophage bibliophage is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Maine
Posts: 8,942
Quote:
The correct answer is Mooooo, uttered in a sort of plaintive bellow. In the interest of perfect technical accuracy I should mention that the conventional spelling is Mu, which is Zen Buddhist for "a question too dumb to be worth answering." However, Mooooo works better for us midwesterners.
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_049
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2002, 09:52 AM
furnishesq furnishesq is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by bibliophage The correct answer is Mooooo, uttered in a sort of plaintive bellow. In the interest of perfect technical accuracy I should mention that the conventional spelling is Mu, which is Zen Buddhist for "a question too dumb to be worth answering." However, Mooooo works better for us midwesterners.
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_049
____________________________________________________

Thanks for all of your answers. The best answer was "Doe Budda have the Budda nature" Which is a great koan and which , quite frankly, I should have known was coming! It is also a beautful answer.

Mu -- it is a beautiful answer as well. Although I disagree with the "a question to dumb to be worth answering" On the contrary, a koan is a question that deserves an answer -- but can only be answered by meditative contemplation and coming up with an enlightend answer -- which Mu is.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.