The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2002, 12:29 PM
elmwood elmwood is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 9,059
Ritalin and Adderall on a drug test

Here's one to ponder.

Now that I'm back in the job market again, I realize that I might have some problems with drug tests.

I have a subscription for Metadate, which is a time-release form of Ritalin. Drugs for AD/HD will show up as meth on drug tests. If I whip out my prescription, the employer will know that I've got AD/HD ... and then pass on me as a prospective employee. Why hire someone who needs drugs to help him concentrate?

So ... what to do?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-15-2002, 02:37 PM
Duck Duck Goose Duck Duck Goose is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
1. Wouldn't the Americans With Disabilities act cover folks with AD/HD?

2. It's always best to be honest with prospective employers about any physical conditions you may have.

3. Wouldn't you rather have your positive drug test for "meth" be easily explainable by the fact that you're on Ritalin? Another reason to be upfront with the Boss about your meds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2002, 03:15 PM
Qadgop the Mercotan Qadgop the Mercotan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Slithering on the hull
Posts: 21,148
A valid physician's prescription for a drug is an acceptable reason to have that drug appear in your urine. So if a test shows the presence of stimulants, once the validity of the Rx is demonstrated, the official report on the urine drug screen will be "negative".

QtM, MD
Certified Medical Review Officer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2002, 06:06 PM
Savaka Savaka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Quote:
Originally posted by Duck Duck Goose
1. Wouldn't the Americans With Disabilities act cover folks with AD/HD?
It would. But the devil's in the details. The burden of proof would be on elmwood to prove that his ADHD was the reason that he was passed over, and this would be very difficult to do. That said, I would still vote for full disclosure. If you're hired, you never have to worry about them finding out that you hid something from them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2002, 08:55 PM
hermn8r hermn8r is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Kind of a Hijack, but a question for Qadgop...

When the results of a drug test are returned to a prospective employer how are they stated?

Does it state what the failure was or simply a positive for 'drugs' without saying of what form?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2002, 09:40 PM
Qadgop the Mercotan Qadgop the Mercotan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Slithering on the hull
Posts: 21,148
Quote:
Originally posted by hermn8r
Kind of a Hijack, but a question for Qadgop...

When the results of a drug test are returned to a prospective employer how are they stated?

Does it state what the failure was or simply a positive for 'drugs' without saying of what form?
It varies. The ones for the Dept. of Transportation are the most standard, and basically just say that the test was positive for "x" drug.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.