The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Comments on Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2004, 01:17 PM
t-keela t-keela is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
wtf is a wood chuck?

In this article
Uncle Cecil answers the question.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
His answer is obvious of course.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Adams
a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood
Now correct me if I am wrong but IIRC the proper response should have been.

A woodchuck would what a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Now perhaps this is the result of a generation gap and he being much older and wiser did in fact give the proper and more antiquated response, perhaps.
Does anyone recall the answer to this critical issue to which the Master has
obviously gone to much effort to answer. We wouldn't want to offend any woodchucks by telling lies about them to the public.

and BTW... just WTF exactly is a woodchuck?

marmot, prariedog, groundhog, gopher, mole, duckbilled platypus...etc and who says they CAN'T chuck wood in the first place?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-23-2004, 03:15 PM
Khadaji Khadaji is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern Pennsylvania
Posts: 21,601
A woodchuck is another name for a groundhog. Woodchuck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2004, 04:39 PM
Kat Kat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
The answer I've always heard is:
"A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as he could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood." which is closer to Unca Cece's answer than to yours.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2004, 05:53 PM
Candy Lover Candy Lover is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat
The answer I've always heard is:
"A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as he could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood." which is closer to Unca Cece's answer than to yours.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck
If a woodchuck could chuck wood?
He would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck
If a woodchuck could chuck wood.

However, in perusing the net, I see about five variants of the third line listed. So there does not seem to be concensus.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2004, 07:53 AM
t-keela t-keela is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khadaji
A woodchuck is another name for a groundhog. Woodchuck
Let it be said, that I do have a clue when it comes to what most people claim is a woodchuck. It is that big-ass rat the mayor of (wherever) holds up every year at Groundhogs day.

In the Appalachian Mountains the woodchuck is known as a whistle pig.

The marmot is a stocky coarse-furred burrowing rodent with a short bushy tail found throughout the northern hemisphere; hibernates in winter and is commonly
called a Ground Hog.

"The Woodchuck is a large North American marmot. " There are apparently several types of marmots.

Prairie dog (Zo["o]l.), a small American rodent (Cynomys Ludovicianus) allied to the marmots. It inhabits the plains west of the Mississippi. The prairie dogs burrow in the ground in large warrens, and have a sharp bark like that of a dog. Called also prairie marmot.

(These prairie rodents are not IMHO what are commonly referred to as woodchucks. Although I have heard people claim they were. I have definitely known them to be called chipmunks.)


Note this: The yaffle, or green woodpecker is also called a Woodchuck. As a woodpecker, don't you think he actually does chuck wood?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:11 AM
t-keela t-keela is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Candy Lover
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck
If a woodchuck could chuck wood?
He would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck
If a woodchuck could chuck wood.

However, in perusing the net, I see about five variants of the third line listed. So there does not seem to be concensus.
The third line IS the line in question. I think the rhyme of my version is far superior to the line that Cecil gave.
That doesn't prove either to be the original version of the riddle, but it has the same number of beats in the verse as the question and it's a hell of a lot smoother on the tongue. I like smooth tongues better.

Q: How much wood/ would a woodchuck chuck... if ...

1: A woodchuck would/ what a woodchuck could...if...

2: He would chuck as much wood/ as a woodchuck could chuck... if...

See what I mean?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:19 AM
elfkin477 elfkin477 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 18,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-keela
In this article
Uncle Cecil answers the question.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
His answer is obvious of course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Adams
a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood
Now correct me if I am wrong but IIRC the proper response should have been.

A woodchuck would what a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Now perhaps this is the result of a generation gap and he being much older and wiser did in fact give the proper and more antiquated response, perhaps. [/size]

Um....I'm an elderly 27, and I've never heard any but Cecil's version, even from five-year-olds saying it; considering he's been fighting ignorance since before I was born, it can't be a generational thing.

" A woodchuck would chuck" gets 1,600 google hits and "A woodchuck would what" gets zero. Spelling it wood-chuck and wood chuck get even fewer results. Odd, I thought everyone knew that tongue twister.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:28 AM
t-keela t-keela is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by elfkin477
Um....I'm an elderly 27, and I've never heard any but Cecil's version, even from five-year-olds saying it; considering he's been fighting ignorance since before I was born, it can't be a generational thing.

" A woodchuck would chuck" gets 1,600 google hits and "A woodchuck would what" gets zero. Spelling it wood-chuck and wood chuck get even fewer results. Odd, I thought everyone knew that tongue twister.
My friends and I have been saying it my way since the early 60's.
It maybe just the way WE said it.
I'm just 42...

and you know what they say about 42
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:54 AM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,685
I wish I knew the full Latin version of this, which was written to be equally a tongue-twister. It begins, [i]Quantam materiam materietur marmota monax...[i].
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:56 AM
Musicat Musicat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI USA
Posts: 14,693
I always thought it was,

"How much ground round would a hound dog hog,
If a ground hog were ground round?"

Thanks to Walt Kelly
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-25-2004, 01:38 AM
Askance Askance is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycarp
I wish I knew the full Latin version of this, which was written to be equally a tongue-twister. It begins, [i]Quantam materiam materietur marmota monax...[i].
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

And this page has a number of other beauties, such as Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinus alacribus et fructuosis potiri potes! (If you can read this sign, you can get a good job in the fast-paced, high-paying world of Latin!)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-31-2004, 03:28 AM
KallieOkami KallieOkami is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat
The answer I've always heard is:
"A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as he could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood." which is closer to Unca Cece's answer than to yours.
i heard "he'd chuck as much would as a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood"
just to be catchier..but basically the same..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-31-2004, 04:25 AM
Peanuthead Peanuthead is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khadaji
A woodchuck is another name for a groundhog. Woodchuck

Well then: How much ground could a groundhog hog if a groundhog could hog ground?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-31-2004, 09:18 AM
AtomicDog AtomicDog is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
I'm suprised no one has posted this yet..

Evil Nazi Groundhogs
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-01-2005, 09:36 AM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,685
Woodchucks, groundhogs, marmots, prairie dogs, and all their kin are ground-dwelling members of Family Sciuridae, in Suborder Sciuramorpha of Order Rodentia -- essentially the branch of the squirrel family that decided excavated holes in the ground, as opposed to holes in trees, made appropriate living quarters.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-10-2013, 08:31 AM
juniorhoss juniorhoss is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
All of these critters are God's (or Mother Natures) natural means of supplying us with target practice.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-10-2013, 11:41 PM
njtt njtt is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
It is like the first casting conference for the movie Ed Wood:
"Who would be Ed Wood?"
"I was thinking Edward Woodward would be Ed Wood."

So tehy went with Johnny Depp.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-11-2013, 07:11 AM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 14,674
Moderator just noting that this is an eight-year old thread, revived by juniorhoss. That's not a problem per se, just want y'all to be aware so that if you're replying to someone who posted that long ago, they might not respond (for a variety of reasons, including not still being on the SDMB, and not remembering that they posted to this thread, and...)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-11-2013, 09:25 AM
steviep24 steviep24 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2012
Do woodchucks chuck wood?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-28-2013, 01:50 PM
jsgoddess jsgoddess is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
I know it's an old zombie, but I don't say this the same way as any of the options above. The version I'm familiar with (from Appalachian Ohio):

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
A woodchuck would chuck all he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

Sometimes:

... if a woodchuck could and would chuck wood.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-28-2013, 03:38 PM
TBG TBG is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
My mom says when she was a girl the whole thing was different, instead of how much wood, it was what kind of wood.
What kind of wood
would a woodchuck chuck
if a woodchuck
could chuck wood?

A woodchuck
would chuck
whatever kind of wood
a woodchuck could chuck
if a woodchuck
could chuck wood
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:05 PM
LawMonkey LawMonkey is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-keela View Post
The marmot is a stocky coarse-furred burrowing rodent with a short bushy tail found throughout the northern hemisphere; hibernates in winter and is commonly called a Ground Hog.
Also, let's not forget that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for domestic... you know, within the city -- that ain't legal either.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:18 PM
Bosda Di'Chi of Tricor Bosda Di'Chi of Tricor is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dogpatch/Middle TN.
Posts: 27,577
For Woodchucks, chucking wood is like their morning coffee.

THIS is what they look like without coffee.
__________________
There's an Initiation Ceremony.
It involves a Squid and a Goat.
You're gonna be good friends with that Goat.
The Squid will not exactly be a stranger, either. ~~Me, on the SDMB Initiation
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.