|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please don't read this, again about penis patch, sorry.
That was the subject line of a piece of spam I got. Hey, if I have to deal with spammers, at least I have honest, apologetic spammers.
Whoever wrote it even apologized two or three timse in the email body itself (because of the subject line, I felt a need to open it...don't worry, I use a web mail browser so nothing bad got onto my PC.)I also got another piece with the following as the messaeg body: Quote:
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dude, I don't understand your OP.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your penis needs patching? I'm very sorry to hear that.
As for the goofball bit about tissue caricature, that's how the spam avoids being clobbered by Bayesian filters - they look for prevalence of words like "viagra" and "refinance" in proportion to other words. More about Bayesian filters here. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So basically the more "normal" words that appear relative to "spam" words (like viagra, porn, penis, etc...) the less likely it will be marked as spam? So, in theory, a piece of spam could say:
"Come get your free porn penis viagra enlarger!" And as long as it then was followed by a stream of 1000 normal words it might be marked as good email? Weird. I thought most filters just looked for one instance of a "spam" word and that was it. I know I've had plenty of good emails get marked as such jsut because of a casual reference to a "spam" word. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|