These posts are just the most recent examples. Granted, our standards are lower in a Pit thread, but he does the same in GD. All the time.
Fish got to swim, birds got to fly.
… assholes gotta shit?
(Sorry, couldn’t resist! :D)
Really, what choice does he have? If he doesn’t show up to defend the indefensible, people will think he’s a coward or a flip-flopper or unpatriotic or a traitor or that he hates America. And yet there’s that indefensible part.
Drive-bys are all he has.
translation: stop posting
Sun, stop rising in the East; Bank, stop screwing me over; Clothahump, stop with the driveby posts…geeze, you people want everything!
But we have plenty of conservative Dopers who bring something of real substance to the table.
Yeah, but none of those are true conservatives.
We need official lists. I learned just the other day that I may not be a true libertarian because I don’t like Bill Maher.
Is that how you remember it?
speak for yourself. We at the “liberal but not a fucking lunatic society” have an extensive and accurate member list.
…Your Holiness, may I suggest you attend services with the Lutherans; Hey Yogi! Use the john! No one wants to see that shit…
Hoot, mon.
Sorry if I don’t get it, but don’t drive by posts usually consist of one line and add nothing?
Like every post in this thread ? 
Including mine.
Ya got it all wrong, those are Clothahump’s content filled posts, his content free posts don’t make it past the capybarras!
CMC fnord!
I know that was an answer made in jest, but very recently one can make a very accurate list of who is “liberal but not a fucking lunatic”.
Just check who still believes in the 9/11 “the buildings were destroyed in a controlled demolition!” conspiracy and one can identify who are the lunatic leftists. (One has to notice that that list do include some lunatic rightists) As many have noticed elsewhere in the SDMB, recently the loony conspiracies of 9/11 suddenly are coming back in force.
IMHO if there is any conspiracy, it is the one were I think there is a strong effort to catapult these “theories” with the intension to drown the very good questions of 9/11 and deceitfully make the very though questions regarding the incompetency of the administration on preventing that attack, to be seen as equal to questions raised by the loony conspiracy theorists.
How hard is it to count to “one?”
No, we learned that Bill Maher isn’t a libertarian because you don’t like him. Subtle difference.
You only think you’re joking.
Did you see any smilies in that post? 
CMC fnord!
Can’t agree with the OP. Regardless of how one feels about The 'hump, I see nothing wrong with the posts cited.
Since when is being succinct, a problem, and verbosity a virtue? The topic was Bill Maher. Clothahump posted his opinion regarding Maher. End of post. End of story.
He was on topic. Let it go.