My Presidential campaign

It’s official: I’m running.

With so many people already in the race, why shouldn’t I? I’m a centrist Democrat from Ohio, so I figure my chances are at least as good as Dennis Kucinich’s. I have experience in Federal and state government. I have a smart, lovely, supportive wife and three well-behaved, photogenic young sons. I meet all of the constitutional requirements for eligibility. I can’t think of any skeletons in my closet scary enough to lose me votes.

Dopers will be given special consideration for all Federal appointments. And my pledge to you: I will never ask you for campaign contributions.

Questions? Comments? Observations?

See you on the stump.

Better, maybe, since Dennis Kucinich isn’t considered all that centrist. :slight_smile:

So…

Would you have originally voted for our involvement in the Iraq War?
What should we do about Iraq now?
Should we intervene in Darfur?
Should we recognize Taiwan?
Should we grant amnesty to illegal aliens? Under what conditions?
How would you improve our competitiveness in the world?
How would you solve the Israeli-Palestinian standoff?
Did NAFTA help or hurt?
Should we leave the UN?
How would you ensure that every American gets proper health care?
Would a candidate named Elendil’s Heir retreat to Middle Earth Fantasy land when the big decisions have to be made?
What are your stances on The Conservative Agenda:

  • gay marriage?
  • gays in the military?
  • The People’s Right To Bear AK-47’s?
  • Abortion?
  • School Prayer?
  • Posting the Ten Commandments in courtrooms?

Does your head hurt yet?

And most importantly: whose whore are you? Just the SDMB’s? :smiley:

  1. Exactly my point!

  2. Yes, with considerable reluctance, based upon the best information available to those outside of the Bush Administration at the time.

  3. Begin immediate planning for a U.S. withdrawal, and carry it out as soon as practicable. The war has become unwinnable, due to egregious errors from the outset by the President and his inner circle, and no further purpose is served by keeping U.S. forces there. The country has become a training ground for Al Qaeda, our true enemy since 9-11, and is bleeding the U.S. Army and Marine Corps badly. We must also welcome far more Iraqis who have helped our forces and seek naturalization and citizenship here.

  4. I’m open to the possibility. The Sudan regime’s policy and goals are clearly genocidal. I’d want to meet with the JCS and the civilian Pentagon leadership, though, as the U.S. military is currently badly overstretched in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  5. No. I think that would do more harm than good right now. I do believe that we need to make it very clear to the PRC that we would not stand by if the PRC tried to attack or even invade Taiwan. I would be open to the prospect of a SEATO-style treaty with Taiwan.

  6. We are a nation of immigrants, and every day they make invaluable contributions to the United States, but we are also a nation under the rule of law. The current situation is untenable. We cannot be secure, as a nation, if our borders are not secure. I agree with the President that the current Democratic bill has real potential, but haven’t studied it closely enough to announce my support of it. I’d better huddle with my advisors on that.

  7. We’re already pretty competitive. I have no particular new policy on that front.

  8. That’s largely something the Palestinians and Israelis will have to do for themselves. I support, as have past administrations, any effort that will lead to a free, democratic and independent Palestine and Israel living peacefully side by side. My administration would lend its good offices to that end. I recall, however, that President Clinton worked long and hard on this issue, down to the level of detail of street-by-street border redrawing in Jerusalem, all to no avail. I have no illusions as to the prospect of success on this front, but we’ve got to try.

  9. That’s a close call. All in all, I think it has been a net good, but there have been serious economic dislocations in some industries such as textiles. I am at heart in favor of free and fair trade across the globe, and that is the great tide of history.

  10. Absolutely not. The UN would not exist but for the hard work and early commitment of Democratic Party leaders such as FDR and Harry Truman. For all its flaws, the UN still has an important role to play in the world. I would want to meet early in my term with the new UN Secretary-General and explore ways to improve the UN’s effectiveness, openness, efficiency and integrity.

  11. We need to learn the lessons of the failed 1993-1994 Clinton policy initiative and work more closely with the American business community, both big and small business, and the HMOs and insurance companies, to figure out the best approach. I don’t have a magic answer. Americans spend far more and get far less for their medical care, compared to other industrialized countries, and we can do much better on this front. I do not believe that a single-payer system is feasible in this country, either economically or politically.

  12. Tempting though that would be, no, never!

  13. I personally support gay marriage. I have gay friends who love each other just as much their straight counterparts, who want to raise families and have all of the benefits of marriage that the rest of us take for granted. Marriage in this country is far more endangered by domestic violence, adultery and substance abuse than by gay marriage. If I were a state legislator, I would vote in favor of gay marriage here in Ohio. However, marriage has historically been a state matter, and I agree with Sen. McCain that the Federal government ought to keep its nose out of it. If a bill to repeal DOMA reached my Oval Office desk, I would sign it, but I also recognize that is extremely unlikely. We are not yet there, as a nation.

  14. I oppose “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” It has been a failure, and has caused a grave injustice to patriotic gay Americans who want to serve their country. We are now forcing valuable men and women out of the U.S. armed forces under the policy, including, for instance, Arabic translators whose services are desperately needed post-9-11. I agree with Vice President Dick Cheney, who while Secretary of Defense called the exclusion of gays “an old chestnut,” as I agree with former Reagan Pentagon official Lawrence Korb, who suggested that there is no rational military basis for it. It is long overdue for repeal. I am struck that virtually all of the arguments that have been made against permitting gays to openly serve were also raised against President Truman’s courageous decision to desegregate the military. Truman did the right thing, and so should we.

  15. The Second Amendment refers to “a well regulated militia.” From the 1930s, when the issue was first litigated, until John Ashcroft’s lamentable term as Attorney General, the U.S. Department of Justice has argued in our nation’s courts that the right to bear arms is a collective and not an individual right. That is also my strongly-held view. Death and injury rates in America due to gun violence are far higher than in other Western democracies, and that’s just wrong. We should not be reading, week in and week out, about shootings throughout our country.

  16. I am strongly pro-choice. I agree with former President Bill Clinton that abortion in the U.S. should be “legal, safe and rare.” I personally oppose the Federal so-called “partial-birth abortion” law, recently and unwisely upheld by the Supreme Court, because it contains no exception for the health and safety of mothers. Repugnant though the procedure is, it is sometimes medically necessary, and the law should reflect that.

  17. There’s nothing preventing American schoolchildren from praying in school - quietly, to themselves, in such a manner as to not disturb their classmates or the educational mission of our schools. What the law requires, consistent with the wise and necessary “wall of separation” between church and state of which Jefferson wrote, is that the government not favor one religion over another, or force prayer on children who may feel stigmatized or persecuted because they don’t wish to pray. I support permitting religious student groups the same access to school facilities after hours as other extracurricular groups. But we have only to look at Iran to see the grave perils of blurring the line between church and state.

  18. I think the best policy would be to not erect new Ten Commandment plaques in public places such as courtrooms and government buildings. Where they have long been in place, however, I would be willing to leave them in place for the sake of history and tradition. If other religious groups wished to erect iconic representations of their own faith tradition in such places, it would only be fair to permit them to do so. As these displays grew ever more unwieldy and cluttered, the wisdom of keeping all religious iconography out of public places would become apparent.

  19. Nope!

  20. No one’s. I love my country and want to see it a better, freer, stronger and more farsighted place. That’s why I’m running.

Thanks for your responses, EH. You’ve got my vote.

Sounds like you need a good marketing campaign… something even more effective than having to bump this thread now and then… :slight_smile:

“Centrist”? Fuck that shit! We need a leftist POTUS, not some right-wing neanderthal like Kucinich! :wink:

I would think you have a slightly better chance of being elected than Dennis Kucinich.

I can support the beginnings of your platform. I already prefer you to all but one Republican and you are right up there with Obama and ahead of Clinton for Dems I could possibly vote for.

Good luck,
Jim

What is your position on Piracy?
What will you do to assist the Buccaneer-American community?
Do you feel that the phrase “yo-ho-ho” is Politically Incorrect?
Are you in favor of Tax Incentives/ Tax Credits on Booty?

Finally…AAaaarrRRrrrrr?

If you were POTUS, Elendil’s, would you support systemic electoral reforms that would promote the emergence of a multiparty system? (Reforms such as ballot fusion, instant-runoff voting, and proportional representation.)

I’m proud to say that I’ve taken part in the last two International Talk Like a Pirate Days, sprinkling my conversations with such phrases as “Ye scurvy dogs” and “Shiver me timbers.” However, that’s all in fun. Other than on the silver screen, piracy today is no laughing matter, as those sailing off the coast of Somalia or near Indonesia, for instance, could tell you. I will do nothing, I’m afraid, to assist the Buccaneer-American community, and I believe that the phrase “Yo ho ho” is politically correct. Booty being, by definition, stolen goods, it will not be encouraged by the tax code under my administration.

Finally…AAArrRRrrr!

Just remembered… here’s a thread I started last year about actual piracy, which indicates what I’d want to look into doing with the world’s greatest Navy: U.S. Navy should do more to fight high-seas piracy - Great Debates - Straight Dope Message Board

Given that I announced the Monstre in 2008 campaign a couple of years ago, I have aready garnered some support amongst Dopers, further revealed in last year’s Campaign Update. While I wish you well, I do hope you don’t intend on trying to steal away the Monstre’s current campaign supporters. Instead, we should be joining forces where possible in order to bring down the so called “major” parties.

For my part, if you pledge not to engage in mudslinging attacks against the Monstre during his run, then when elected, the Monstre graciously promises not to eat you. I’m sure a mutually beneficial arrangement can be… erm… arranged.

Thank you.

Monstre in 2008.

I do not, in principle, wish to encourage the rise of a third or even fourth major party in the U.S. I believe that Italy, Israel, France and to a lesser extent Great Britain have each wrestled with the problem of microparties wielding disproportionate influence in their political systems. In the U.S., third parties have tended to rise in order to back special causes or candidates, and then to fall again; I don’t know that their future here will be any different.

I’m proud to be a Democrat, and I believe that my party is big and welcoming enough for many who might otherwise go to another party. Our priority now should be to ensure that every vote cast is actually counted, and that we avoid the problems which bedeviled the presidential polling in 2000 and 2004. That said, I have no objection to electoral fusion or instant-runoff voting, where they are made very clear to voters. I’m not yet convinced of the wisdom of proportional representation in this country.

What do you intend to do for my people, that is to say non-Americans who would vote for you if they could but can’t on account of being non-Americans?

Since I’m seeking the Democratic Party’s nomination, and you said in your second thread (in response to my own question, you’ll recall) that you’re establishing your own party, there should be no problem. Unless we end up facing off in the general election, I suppose, but let’s cross that bridge when we come to it.

And mudslinging ain’t my style.

Good question. As only U.S. citizens may vote for President, I encourage you to apply for naturalization and citizenship. I would then welcome your vote!

Elendil’s Heir, while I appreciate your enthusiasm for this “project,” I note that you have cross-posted links to this thread in at least nine other threads in several Fora.

While this may avoid a technical violation of the rule prohibiting the cross-posting of threads, it clearly violates the spirit (and possibly the letter) proscribing cross-posting of posts.

I would encourage you to curb your enthusiasm and rely on this thread and the posts already submitted to promote your cause.

[ /Suggesting Moderation ]

Elendil’s Heir, Whats your foreign policy with other industrialised nations ?
How do you plan to handle the growing economic tension between the USA and Europe?
How does the expansion of the EU into less devolped nations effect your view of the EU ?

Well, I must say I like your stance on all the issues except the bit about guns. If it weren’t for that, you might just have my vote. :stuck_out_tongue:

Heck, you might as well have it anyway. My strong belief in the Second Amendment notwithstanding, I recognize that there are much more important issues at stake right now, and I’d much rather have to keep up a rational debate over the right to bear arms with politicians who at least have the right ideas about everything else.

A couple of questions I’d like to ask though: what do you think about:
[ul]
[li]domestic wiretapping and other surveillance?[/li][li]Increasing invasion of privacy and strengthening of police powers, justified by the ongoing “war on terror”?[/li][li]The use of secret detentions and torture by U.S. intelligence agencies and armed services?[/li][/ul]

  • Potato (Just happy to live in a state with a constitution guaranteeing the individual right to bear arms!)

EH, how do you feel about Jackbooted Moderator Thugs, and do you feel such offenses, even if they were “following orders”, merit the death penalty or simply weekly gonadal electrocution?

-Joe

  1. Where do you stand on the exportation of American jobs to other countries–for example, the tech support jobs that have been sent to India?

  2. Regarding the independent Palestine and Israel side by side: Exactly where would the borders of Palestine be, in your ideal situation? Would “Palestine” include just the West Bank? What about East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip? Consider that military or terrorist forces could easily launch missiles at any major city in Israel from either the Gaza Strip or the West Bank (in terms of distance, at least).

  3. Also consider that there are some major trust issues at work. Let’s say, hypothetically, that Israel agreed to give up all control of “Palestine”, but only if you committed a significant American military presence in Israel to help them ensure their people’s safety. What would you do?

  4. What would you do about the increasing infringements on the rights of free speech and free press in Venezuela?

  5. What would you do about the human rights situation in China?

  6. You mentioned that you’re strongly pro-choice. How do you feel about abortion by unwed minors? This question is intentionally open-ended, and I hope you’ll address all of the issues involved like parental notification, parental permission, the government’s willingness to offer financial assistance to would-be teenaged mothers, and the contentiousness of the whole problem on the state level.

  7. More and more students are wrapping part-time class schedules around anywhere from one to three full-time jobs and still struggling to cover their expenses. Do you have a plan regarding financial aid and the rising cost of higher education in general?

  8. President Bush was, IIRC, the only President who didn’t make the trip to Germany to cheer his country on at the 2006 World Cup. The 2010 World Cup in South Africa would fall within your term. Would you show up to cheer on Sam’s Army?

  9. How do you feel about the electoral college?

  10. What, in general terms, is your drug policy?

  11. More specifically, how do you feel about medical marijuana?

  12. Where is the line between state’s regulatory rights and the rule of federal law where medical marijuana is concerned?

  13. Even more specifically, how do you feel about the DEA raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in the California counties that oppose the state’s lenient position on the drug, like San Diego?

  14. Do you have a plan to install harm-reduction policies regarding sex and drug use among adults and minors?

  15. Recent studies have shown that drug testing in schools has no tangible effect on actual drug use, especially considering that most schools only test the students who participate in extracurricular activities (who are less likely to use drugs anyway). How do you feel about drug testing and locker/backpack searches (including the drug-sniffing dog searches) in schools?

  16. Would you take any steps to protect the formation of Gay/Straight Alliances and similar groups in high schools, where founders are often in constant physical danger and meetings are often held in secret locations to protect the groups’ members?

  17. How do you feel about the Cuban embargo?

  18. Where does the line between state’s rights and the rule of federal law lie regarding gun control?

On the contrary, it’s thought that Democratic candidates often lose votes to third-party candidates. Thoughts?