The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:03 AM
Shagnasty Shagnasty is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MA,Exhiled From Louisiana
Posts: 15,762
Movie Snobs: What Popular Movies Are Fashionable to Dislike But You Still Do?

The title says most of the question but lots of movie snobs turn up their noses at movies that are extremely popular yet they feel the need to criticize just because of their popularity. Which of those do you still really like even though you don't like to admit it?

For me, I can't get enough of the movie Titanic even though I am about the opposite of a teenage girl. I am going to watch it for about the 125th time as soon as I submit this thread as a matter of fact. The other one is Forrest Gump. I had a very large Irish gay male boss once that hated the movie because he said "it gives stupid people hope". He gave movie reviews and radio voice-overs in New Orleans so I had to respect his opinion a little but I still like the storyline and I still find the movie inspiring.

Which very popular movies do you really like despite being a snob about such things?

Last edited by Shagnasty; 11-23-2009 at 01:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
  #2  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:44 AM
Talon Karrde Talon Karrde is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
John Hughes movies, especially Pretty in Pink.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:49 AM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 23,538
I thought Titanic and Forrest Gump were both really good movies. Well-made entertainment doesn't get enough respect.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:54 AM
Justin Credible Justin Credible is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. A lot of people seem to dislike it, and it has a fairly poor rating on imdb. I love it, and I gave it a 10 on there.

Also, I liked the first Steve Martin Pink Panther movie really well. The second one was awful though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:04 AM
Ston_Col Ston_Col is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
I absolutely love Sky Captain.

I also really enjoy the Crank movies. I think they'll change the action movie genre. Nobody else agrees with me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:28 AM
Tangent Tangent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
I don't mind admitting that I love both Forrest Gump and Dances With Wolves, even though they are two of the biggest movies that internet movie snobs love to hate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:31 AM
lissener lissener is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
There's a thread on the same subject currently in discussion.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=540677
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:36 AM
Eternal Eternal is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
When The Dark Knight was released there was a lot of hate going on for Tim Burton's Batman and Nicholson's Joker. This came completely out of left field. Great movie, great Joker. Just not as "deep" as the hipsters THINK Dark Knight is.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-23-2009, 03:02 AM
Tim R. Mortiss Tim R. Mortiss is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
When I saw the thread title, I immediately thought Titanic. It is very fashionable to dislike it these days, but I can't imagine why. It totally defines drama, humor, directing, story, characters, special effects, and epic. One of the greats......TRM
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-23-2009, 10:41 AM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talon Karrde View Post
John Hughes movies, especially Pretty in Pink.
Actually I think now that Gen X and early Gen Y-ers are grown up, his movies have sort of a retro-chic cache.
Crash gets a lot of hate on these boards. But I actually liked it.
Was it worthy of the Best Picture Oscar? That's arguable. Was it a little heavy-handed at times? Sure. But contrary to what a lot of people seem to believe, it didn't present race as a black and white issue and I thought it was pretty honest in how it portrayed people's belief systems.

Last edited by joebuck20; 11-23-2009 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-23-2009, 10:44 AM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eternal View Post
When The Dark Knight was released there was a lot of hate going on for Tim Burton's Batman and Nicholson's Joker. This came completely out of left field. Great movie, great Joker. Just not as "deep" as the hipsters THINK Dark Knight is.
Yeah, comparing Jack Nicholson's and Heath Ledger's performances is like comparing apples and oranges. They're two completely different characters for two completely different movies. Nicholson's Joker, I thought, worked very well for what Tim Burton was going for with his film. And Ledger's Joker likewise was a perfect fit for the mood Nolan was trying to create.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-23-2009, 11:00 AM
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA
Posts: 23,199
In answer to the OP, no. If I like a film, I say I like it (e.g., Titanic, Shakespeare in Love, Crash, Burton's Batman) despite what anyone else thinks.

Same if I dislike a film (e.g, Alien, Gattaca)

Re Batman and Crash: the criticism of them is generally based on the fact that there is another good film they're compared to, with the false assumption that they can't both be good films. Both Batman and The Dark Knight are excellent film, as are Crash and Brokeback Mountain, but many people can't hold that concept in their heads.
__________________
"What this world needs is a good two-dollar room and a good two-dollar broom."
Provider of quality fantasy and science fiction since 1982.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-23-2009, 11:31 AM
Baal Houtham Baal Houtham is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Well damn, when I read the thread's title I thought, "That's about as 'meta' as a thread can get."

Movie Snobs: What Popular Movies Are Fashionable to Dislike But You Still Do?

In other words:
What movies do I, as a discriminating movie viewer ("snob"), realize it's fashionable to dislike, but dislike anyway even though it makes me appear to just be following fashion?

Unfortunately it's just another thread about liking movies that got bad/average reviews. Not that there's anything wrong with that Shagnasty, but you got my hopes up that I'd be reading something damn strange.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-23-2009, 11:55 AM
Knorf Knorf is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,747
Three movies that get pretentiously bashed in here all the time but that I still like: American Beauty, The English Patient, The Thin Red Line.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-23-2009, 12:43 PM
Icerigger Icerigger is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 2,115
Same here, I liked Titanic and Waterworld as well.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:36 PM
Mahna Mahna Mahna Mahna is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canadia, eh?
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knorf View Post
Three movies that get pretentiously bashed in here all the time but that I still like: American Beauty, The English Patient, The Thin Red Line.
Thin Red Line, really? Dunno if that really counts towards the OP, considering it's supposed to be about films you feel guilty about enjoying as a film snob, and it seems to me that Terrence Malick sits in the Movie Snob Pantheon of Esteemed Directors.

In fact, I can't think of anyone I've met who says they love one or more Malick films who hasn't also been a self-described film snob... the average movie-goer doesn't have much patience for long, lingering takes with minimal dialogue.

Mendes and Minghella don't quite have the same cachet with the film snob crowd, but their overall body of work is respectable enough to keep your Official Film Snob status safe and sound.

As to the OP, the movie most likely to get my Film Snob card revoked is A Knight's Tale. Yes, it's a silly romantic comedy and the anachronistic music choices are more cheesy than witty (Moulin Rouge did it far better, IMO).... but it's also one heck of a fun romp with some really cool costuming and snappy dialogue. Plus Paul Bettany does a hell of a job as Chaucer.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:58 PM
Hampshire Hampshire is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,413
A lot of people hate romantic comedies and have a special hate for ones containing Hugh Grant.
Actually his are the only ones I like. I've seen Notting Hill, About A boy, Love Actually dozens of times.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-23-2009, 03:11 PM
rivulus rivulus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Another vote for Titanic. I'm just sort of "eh" about the tacked-on love story, but the documentary aspect -- the drama of the ship sinking and the incredible hubris of the whole venture -- is something I find very engaging. All the little sounds and effects of the Titanic's own demise, as well as snippets about how the various passengers and crew responded... it makes my hair stand on end and breaks my heart. It's shattering every time I watch it, because I can't forget that this ship really did go down, and all those people really did die. I thought that part of the movie was very well portrayed.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-23-2009, 03:34 PM
Blaster Master Blaster Master is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
One movie I happen to like that it seems no one else does is The Postman; I'm not even a big fan of it, but so many people seem to hate it that I end up getting stuck defending it. I think Kevin Costner was well cast for that role (he does well in as a quiet loner type, I think), and I personally find the whole reluctant hero story to be much more interesting than a lot of other types. I also think it's interesting to see how ordinary people put in extreme circumstances react. Sure, it's not a terribly deep movie, but it was still entertaining and still made me think. It's no blockbuster, sure, but it's also not the complete pile of crap that everyone seems to think it is.

Also, I agree with what was said about Batman and Jack Nicholson's portrayal of the Joker. It was very well done, fit the movie perfectly, the character was fresh, and he stole the movie almost as much as Ledger stole Dark Knight, except that there actually was more about Bruce Wayne in that film since it was the first one, while Dark Knight could get away with what had been established in Batman Begins.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-23-2009, 03:42 PM
Hampshire Hampshire is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,413
I think most people who have actually seen The Postman like it.
I think it gets a bad rap since it came out a mere two years after the failed Waterworld. I don't think many people gave it a chance and thought "Oh no, Costner is doing another post-apocalyptic film? Didn't he learn from Waterworld?"
and they never even bothered watching it dismissing it on it's premise alone.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:06 PM
JohnT JohnT is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,106
Crash
Titanic
The English Patient

Looks like I hit the trifecta!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:13 PM
thelurkinghorror thelurkinghorror is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampshire View Post
I think most people who have actually seen The Postman like it.
I think it gets a bad rap since it came out a mere two years after the failed Waterworld. I don't think many people gave it a chance and thought "Oh no, Costner is doing another post-apocalyptic film? Didn't he learn from Waterworld?"
and they never even bothered watching it dismissing it on it's premise alone.
Neither was an especially bad film on their own, they just were not as great as Costner thought and were massive financial failures. I liked to Postman okay, it was just way longer than it needed to be.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:22 PM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2001
The Matrix.

I'm with everyone else on Reloaded and Revolutions, but the first movie ticks a lot of boxes for me.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:23 PM
Ronald C. Semone Ronald C. Semone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 884
Walt Disney's Alice In Wonderland
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:35 PM
Simplicio Simplicio is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Blair Witch Project seems to get dumped on for being popular. Ditto Crash which I thought was really good.

I still don't understand the hate for Dances with Wolves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
The Matrix.
People hate on The Matrix? It was doing pretty well on the "best film of the 90's thread".

And on the opposite side, why are we talking about The Postman? I liked it too, but I can hardly see how it can be called a popular movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahna
Thin Red Line, really?
The Thin Red Line seems to suffer from some type of meta-meta snobbery. It wasn't a commercial success, but was well reviewed and seems to be made to appeal to snobs. But if your a snob, you don't want to like what's predictable or popular, even amongst snobs, so it gets dumped on, around here anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:45 PM
drm drm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,815
People generally dislike Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, don't they (Burton version)? I actually enjoy it much more than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I REALLY dislike Charlie in the first movie and I'm not clear on why he's more worthy than the other kids - but that's another rant.

In the Burton version, perhaps the Willy and his dad aspect was a bit unnecessary - although I don't really mind it, overall I much prefer it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:50 PM
Shagnasty Shagnasty is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MA,Exhiled From Louisiana
Posts: 15,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by drm View Post
People generally dislike Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, don't they (Burton version)? I actually enjoy it much more than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I REALLY dislike Charlie in the first movie and I'm not clear on why he's more worthy than the other kids - but that's another rant.
If you want to go on a tangent, I can help you with that last point. I started a thread about it once. Charlie is basically white trash.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...colate+factory
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:50 PM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simplicio View Post
People hate on The Matrix? It was doing pretty well on the "best film of the 90's thread".
I've certainly seen quite a lot of snobby disapproval of it (often coupled with anime-elitism - i.e. "It's just a poor take-off of Ghost in the shell")
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:52 PM
ArchiveGuy ArchiveGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampshire View Post
I think most people who have actually seen The Postman like it.
Oh really?
Quote:
I think it gets a bad rap since it came out a mere two years after the failed Waterworld. I don't think many people gave it a chance and thought "Oh no, Costner is doing another post-apocalyptic film? Didn't he learn from Waterworld?"
and they never even bothered watching it dismissing it on it's premise alone.
Of course, there is the other possibility: that it really does suck (said by someone who saw it before it was released so had no word-of-mouth or critics' opinions to influence him beforehand)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:52 PM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by drm View Post
People generally dislike Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, don't they (Burton version)?
Yes, mostly for Tim Burton's decision to characterise Willy Wonka as Michael Jackson-esque, I think.

BTW, you transposed the titles. The musical version with Gene Wilder was Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Tim Burton's version was Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Last edited by Mangetout; 11-23-2009 at 06:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-23-2009, 06:52 PM
drm drm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shagnasty View Post
If you want to go on a tangent, I can help you with that last point. I started a thread about it once. Charlie is basically white trash.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...colate+factory
lol, very nice. I completely agree.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:21 PM
Skald the Rhymer Skald the Rhymer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by drm View Post
People generally dislike Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, don't they (Burton version)? I actually enjoy it much more than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I REALLY dislike Charlie in the first movie and I'm not clear on why he's more worthy than the other kids - but that's another rant.

In the Burton version, perhaps the Willy and his dad aspect was a bit unnecessary - although I don't really mind it, overall I much prefer it.
The Burton version, which is not a remake of the Wilder version but an adaptation of the source material, is Charlie & the Chocolate Factory. The Wilder version is Willie Wonka & the Chocolate Factory.

I too love the Burton/Depp version. I have never been able to sit through the Wilder version. Few things are more odious than that farking "Candyman" song.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:34 PM
HubZilla HubZilla is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Dances with Wolves is one of my favorite movies, especially the soundtrack.

Like most folks here, I love the three Lord of the Rings movie, but I'm going against the grain by saying Return of the King was my favorite of the three.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:52 PM
handsomeharry handsomeharry is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Well, when anybody even mentions Adventures of Ford Fairlane, they diss it. I Love it.
Not that it didn't need some editing, bt it was pretty amusing.
Forrest Gump.
Armageddon. It was crap, but I liked it.
All Bruce Willis movies, except for Hudson Hawk.

Hmmm...that's about it.

for now.

hh
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-23-2009, 08:39 PM
drm drm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skald the Rhymer View Post
The Burton version, which is not a remake of the Wilder version but an adaptation of the source material, is Charlie & the Chocolate Factory. The Wilder version is Willie Wonka & the Chocolate Factory.

I too love the Burton/Depp version. I have never been able to sit through the Wilder version. Few things are more odious than that farking "Candyman" song.
Dang, can't believe I messed that up...ah well.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-23-2009, 09:24 PM
aruvqan aruvqan is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Eastern Connecticut
Posts: 6,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by handsomeharry View Post
Well, when anybody even mentions Adventures of Ford Fairlane, they diss it. I Love it.
Not that it didn't need some editing, bt it was pretty amusing.
Forrest Gump.
Armageddon. It was crap, but I liked it.
All Bruce Willis movies, except for Hudson Hawk.

Hmmm...that's about it.

for now.

hh
I liked Adventures of Ford Fairlane, good popcorn flick. Love the car.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-23-2009, 10:42 PM
lissener lissener is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampshire View Post
A lot of people hate romantic comedies and have a special hate for ones containing Hugh Grant.
Actually his are the only ones I like. I've seen Notting Hill, About A boy, Love Actually dozens of times.
Notting Hill and About a Boy are both good movies. Love Actually, I'd take a railroad spike in the eye first.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-23-2009, 11:10 PM
GameHat GameHat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
I'll guess I'll throw in 300.

Yeah, it's over-stylized, dumb, and (under some interpretations) a bit racist.

But God damn it, it's fucking awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-24-2009, 12:26 AM
spoke- spoke- is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
I'm gonna say Mars Attacks. It cracks me up.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-24-2009, 01:32 AM
Mississippienne Mississippienne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
I still love Last Action Hero and think it's a great solid 90s action movie with a clever premise. The movie was savaged by critics and still doesn't seem to get any respect. C'mon, it's got lovingly crafted shout-outs to half of Hollywood's output from Bogart to the T-1000, the villains are so memorable (who can forget Charles Dance as Benedict with his glass eye), the kid sidekick is actually quick-witted and not annoying, and it's classic Ah-nuld.

Long Kiss Goodnight bombed hard at the box office, but I put it up with LAH as one of the best full-throttle action movies of the 90s. The dialogue is snappy, Samuel L. Jackson is amazing as always, and Geena Davis is just brutal as the amnesiac assassin-turned-suburban mom. I rank it lower than LAH only because the little kid is annoying and lisps a lot.

I thought The Postman was shit, but I quite enjoyed Waterworld.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-24-2009, 01:58 AM
needscoffee needscoffee is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchiveGuy View Post
Oh really? Of course, there is the other possibility: that it really does suck (said by someone who saw it before it was released so had no word-of-mouth or critics' opinions to influence him beforehand)
Bashing someone's choice of a movie they admit to liking in a thread about liking movies that snobs dislike?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-24-2009, 04:35 AM
cactus waltz cactus waltz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mississippienne View Post
I still love Last Action Hero and think it's a great solid 90s action movie with a clever premise. The movie was savaged by critics and still doesn't seem to get any respect. C'mon, it's got lovingly crafted shout-outs to half of Hollywood's output from Bogart to the T-1000, the villains are so memorable (who can forget Charles Dance as Benedict with his glass eye), the kid sidekick is actually quick-witted and not annoying, and it's classic Ah-nuld.

Long Kiss Goodnight bombed hard at the box office, but I put it up with LAH as one of the best full-throttle action movies of the 90s. The dialogue is snappy, Samuel L. Jackson is amazing as always, and Geena Davis is just brutal as the amnesiac assassin-turned-suburban mom. I rank it lower than LAH only because the little kid is annoying and lisps a lot.
I haven't seen these for a good while, but they were both very popular at my household. Long Kiss Goodnight is underrated.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:13 AM
Alessan Alessan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by lissener View Post
Love Actually, I'd take a railroad spike in the eye first.
I halfway agree with you there - the Hugh Grant/Alan Rickman/Emma Thompson/Bill Nighy/Liam Neeson portions of the movie are good-to-excellent; everything else is crap.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-24-2009, 06:17 AM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2006
Fifth Element
Beetlejuice
Heavens Gate
I like them. But Chis Christoferson is the most wooden actor of all time.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-24-2009, 10:37 AM
Eyebrows 0f Doom Eyebrows 0f Doom is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzomax View Post
Beetlejuice
It's fashionable to dislike Beetlejuice?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-24-2009, 10:44 AM
Freudian Slit Freudian Slit is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyebrows 0f Doom View Post
It's fashionable to dislike Beetlejuice?
My thoughts, too. I don't know that it's considered great art but I think most people think it's fun and enjoyable. Even if they don't like it, I don't know any "snobs" going out of their way to look down on Beetlejuice.

Also shouldn't the thread title be "What Popular Movies Are Fashionable to Dislike But You Don't"?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-24-2009, 11:07 AM
Stranger On A Train Stranger On A Train is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eternal View Post
When The Dark Knight was released there was a lot of hate going on for Tim Burton's Batman and Nicholson's Joker. This came completely out of left field. Great movie, great Joker. Just not as "deep" as the hipsters THINK Dark Knight is.
Personally, I thought The Dark Knight was disjointed, shallow, and trying to beat the viewer over the head with its message. The Burton/Keaton portrayal of Batman was a lot more subtle and humanistic in many ways, especially since he didn't go to great length or spend valuable story and character development time to try to rationalize how and why Batman had such equipment and means available to him.

Stranger
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-24-2009, 01:53 PM
Carl Corey Carl Corey is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampshire View Post
I think most people who have actually seen The Postman like it.
I think it gets a bad rap since it came out a mere two years after the failed Waterworld. I don't think many people gave it a chance and thought "Oh no, Costner is doing another post-apocalyptic film? Didn't he learn from Waterworld?"
and they never even bothered watching it dismissing it on it's premise alone.
Nope, I never watched it because I loathed the book.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-24-2009, 02:06 PM
ArchiveGuy ArchiveGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by needscoffee View Post
Bashing someone's choice of a movie they admit to liking in a thread about liking movies that snobs dislike?
It's perfectly fine that he likes the film and I'm not bashing his choice to do so.

But to assert that Postman lovers constitute a silent majority is, well, delusional. And this thread has more than enough of that already. :d&r:
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-24-2009, 03:43 PM
msmith537 msmith537 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
I'm a little confused. Weren't Titanic, Forest Gump, and Dances Wolves massively popular, hugely grossing, Acadamy Award winning films?



I actually like all the Matrix movies more or less equally. At least I don't think the second and third film are any stupider than the first. The second film had one of the best car chases ever (even though by necessesity a lot of it was CGI).

Starship Troopers.

Any film by Michael Bay.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

The Straight Dope / Questions or comments for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com
Comments regarding this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com
For advertising information, see the Creative Loafing Media, Inc. Online Rate Sheet
"The Straight Dope by Cecil Adams" is a registered trademark of Creative Loafing Media, Inc. Contents of the Straight Dope Message Board and the Straight Dope Web site are copyright 1984-2009 by Creative Loafing Media, Inc. All rights reserved. By posting on this board you grant the Creative Loafing Media, Inc., and its successors and assigns a nonexclusive irrevocable right to re-use your posting in any manner it or they see fit without notice or compensation to you. No material contained in this site may be republished or reposted without express written consent of the Creative Loafing Media, Inc., except that message board users retain the right to republish or repost their own work.

Other Creative Loafing Media, Inc. sites:

Creative Loafing Atlanta | Creative Loafing Charlotte | Chicago Reader | Creative Loafing Sarasota | Creative Loafing Tampa | Washington City Paper