Let’s give credit where credit is due. Being the butt of jokes because of matters of simple reasoning is still a HUGE improvement on his predecessor, Ms McKinney.
If 20,000 people moved to the western edge of Las Palmas in The Canaries, and began to jump up and down, they could cause a landslide that would flood a large stretch of the eastern seaboard of the USA.
With all this computing power, we should be able to compute the exact sequence needed to allow 100 million Americans to jump up and down in order to cause an Earthquake anywhere in the world. Of course, once this technology is unleashed, then we’re solidly fucked, because they have a lot more people in India and China, who they could “weaponize” by paying them $1 a day to stand in strategic spots and merely threaten to jump up and down in sequence.
Well, that would be a much more believable scenario, of course.
Except that … I just don’t see it. His previous and subsequent questions, which appear to be serious, are asked in exactly the same manner.
And I’d also note, somewhat cynically, that the tone and word choice of the clarification… “…a tipping point which would adversely affect the island’s fragile ecosystem and over burden its already overstressed infrastructure…” is not exactly consistent with his word choice and content when speaking. Of course, many people have a different “voice” when speaking and writing… but on the whole, I am not persuaded.
Well, that’s even worse. Wasting the American peoples’ time and money with his waggish ways. This is serious business, and we’ve got no time for any dead-pan sarcasm!
(Ironically enough, I feel compelled to point out that the above is intended as dead-pan sarcasm.)