|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Political nobody wins SC Democratic US Senate nomination in strangest political upset of the year.
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/06/...south-carolina
This article poses a question many of us in South Carolina are asking tonight, who the heck is Alvin Greene? To call this an upset is a bit of an understatement. And before you assume this may be another case of the supposed anti-establishment fever sweeping the nation, take note that nobody has ever even seen this supposed candidate and the leading theory is that people just blindly voted for the first name alphabetically. He was so nervous and obviously unprepared when the media came to him for comment that he could only speak in unintelligible gibberish. I've never seen anyone express any kind of dissatisfaction with Vic Rawl, who obviously had a well put together campaign. There was never a moment of doubt that he would beat the guy who didn't even have a campaign website, well it looks like the joke is on us. Sources say the Demint people are falling asleep tonight with giant grins on their faces. So do people really vote randomly in races they know nothing about? Can someone really be the victim of a bad name in the nomination for a position as high profile as US Senator? I'd understand if this as a party runoff for railroad commissioner or neighborhood dog catcher, but come on! Can some of you politically astute people please tel me what the heck just happened? |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's weird, don't get me wrong. But it's not like it matters. DeMint will walk away with that one regardless of who the D nominee is.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Damn, reading that story, he makes Sarah Palin sound like George Plimpton.
Quote:
Last edited by joebuck20; 06-09-2010 at 07:33 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The biggest gossip in town, along with Mr. Zykowski.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not cool, Mr. Greene. Not cool. Even if Demint's a shoe-in for this race - if you weren't prepared to be a capable, articulate spokesman for the Democratic Party, you had no business seeking the nomination.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
South Carolina politics continues to be the laughingstock of America. Joe "you lie" Wilson, state Senator Jake Knotts calling President Obama and gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley (Tea Party favorite accused of two different affairs) ragheads, the aforementioned Haley, and now this.
Just another in a long line of utterly bogus and mindbogglingly stupid South Carolina political events. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think it is more embarrassing for Vic Rawl to be beaten by this complete unknown than it would be to be beaten by a dead man. At least a dead man gets his name in the paper. Mr. Greene can't even get his name in the obituaries. Does anyone know if South Carolina has open or closed primaries? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is truly a weird story. Almost like Head of State, but with the candidate being nowhere near as funny as Chris Rock. Last edited by Duke; 06-09-2010 at 09:35 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And of course it's always worth mentioning the guy with the horse (Twice! With the same horse!). |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I kinda hope someone helps Mr Greene make a go of it. He won't win unless DeMint gets caught giving blow-jobs in the mens room, but you figure the national party can make some hay out of the guys story (thirteen year military veteran returns to the US in the middle of the Recession, can't get a break, decides to make a quixotic run for office), especially in the current anti-elitist environment. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The only thing I can think is that the race was so low profile and people so apathetic and uninformed that they picked at random in the voting booth. I've seen this phenomenon before, I even did it myself in my first few elections until I wised up and realized that was a terrible thing to do. Basically you go to the ballot knowing a race or two you are interested in, but there are all these extra contests you don't know about so treat it like a multiple choice test that you are trying to complete before the time is up. The correct thing to do in that situation of course is just leave those spots blank, but many people don't even realize you can do that. Still though, most people involved in politics know that this happens and can account for some scattershot votes, but to actually decide a party nomination for US Senate of all things? Something doesn't seem right here at all. South Carolina has an open primary. Obviously the majority votes on the Republican ballot, especially at a time like this when the R side was especially attention grabbing with several key races people wanted to vote on, I suspect it even drug away a number of our Democrats who wanted to have a say in the headline races. The Republican ballot was pretty long and even had a few policy questions on the ballot, the Democratic ballot was pretty boring let me tell you, there were three low profile races on mine, none of them very contested or interesting. So yea there was a pretty shallow pool of voters here, probably had something to do with the result. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think that guy is from Georgia. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope. To quote Jon Stewart, "world's most alluring horse".
Back on topic: it'll be interesting to see what Mr Greene does next with the weight of the party behind him and presumably a bit more money to spend. I'm guessing the DNC will at least get the guy a new suit and a PR coach. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
South Carolina . . . It's nice to know somebody is there to make Florida politics look good!
Last edited by BrainGlutton; 06-09-2010 at 11:04 AM. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't Eddie Murphy already make this movie?
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sure they'll back him, but I'm thinking the DNC is not going to spend too much money or time on a hopeless race. State organizations might do more for the guy but the DNC will probably do the bare minimum. What a weird story.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The guy that ran Fred Tuttle's campaign could make a doucumentray out of it and help make it worth Greene's while. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Open Primary, natch. Hoo boy, them 'ol boys pulled a goodun', votin' fer (someone they perceive to be a) Stepin Fetchit. HAW HAW HAW, they done messed with them commie faggots in Warshington now!
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seriously, in a not-too-hot primary in a not-so-big state, somebody can win just by nailing a couple of key districts, so I'd say it's a vagary of party primary politics and non-compulsary elections, among other things...
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well the plot thickens.
http://www.wltx.com/news/local/story...=88409&catid=2 Dude's got a pending felony charge. Great. It'd sure be interesting to be a fly on the wall at a state party meeting right now. I know there was only a 5% chance of the Demint losing anyway, but dammit I wanted my 5% chance! |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He's accused of showing Internet photos to a University of South Carolina student. The felony charge carries up to five years in prison. WTF kinda crime is that? If the gal is in college, she's most likely old enough to see porn and/or copulate at will. Last edited by Oakminster; 06-09-2010 at 01:49 PM. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
*Yes, that is officially his name now. Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know they aren't going to play up that portion of it. The word felony is in there, and that's going to hurt. What might be useful is to use it to bar him from the full race, putting Vic Rawl back in if the DNC thinks he has better chances. Then again, if people would rather vote for a complete unknown rather than you, I'd guess you aren't well liked.
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Let the record reflect that I said "Eww" in as masculine a manner as possible. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is hilarious, or it would be if..... nah, it's still hilarious.
BTW, he's not going to get squat from the DNC unless his poll numbers are good enough. A good friend of mine was the Dem candidate for Congress a few years back in a district where the GOP candidate has handily won for decades. He was told that he would get money for having poll numbers at a certain level at certain times. He did get lots of free advice from some high profile people but that was it at the national level. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure I buy the "voting randomly" or "voting alphabetically" argument. I'd expect that the sorts of people who would turn out for an off-year primary election would be at least somewhat informed on the candidates (even if that "information" consists of just knowing who their media of choice told them to vote for), and US Senator has to be pretty close to the top of the ballot. I'd think that the people who genuinely didn't know who either candidate was, or who didn't care, would just stay home.
The only scenario that seems plausible to me is that this was driven by cross-party votes from folks who actually support DeMint, and want him to face the weakest opposition possible. The whole thing reminds me of the US Representative general election here in Montana, two years ago. The Democratic challenger to Republican incumbent Denny Rehberg literally spent zero dollars on his campaign. He had no ads, no fliers, even his official campaign website was on a free webhost. If he had any sort of word-of-mouth operation going, it was a pretty pathetic one, given that it didn't even penetrate to this college town. He didn't win, but he did manage to take about a third of the vote, which says to me that a third of Montanans will either blindly vote for whichever name has a D next to it, or really hate Rehberg.
__________________
Time travels in divers paces with divers persons. --As You Like It, III:ii:328 |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2010_...0867602&page=2
Apparently he was kicked out of the army as well, unflattering stuff is coming out pretty quickly now since candidates thought to have no chance of winning don't get vetted that well. A Columbia station did an interview with him today that they will be airing tonight, so we'll have some video soon to see just how trainwrecky the situation is. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...enate-race.php
And even crazier, the party is now asking him to step down. Just bizarre. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno anything about Rawl, but he's gotta be feeling like something the cat did and forgot to cover up about now.
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't stopped laughing since I read this.
BTW how many senators from south carolina have been black felons? |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
South Carolina has never had a black senator, so I'm going to guess the number is approximately zero.
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
I heard he prefers Carl "INTERSPECIES EROTICA" Paladino. And Randall says the horse's name is Kelly.
__________________
Poor Impulse Control: "My goal as a guitarist has always been to sound as if I have Satan trapped under a lawnmower." Last edited by Snowboarder Bo; 06-09-2010 at 04:57 PM. Reason: I just really like to edit. |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
It has nothing to do with her age. You're not allowed to go around showing pornography to adults against their will.
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Internet: Nobody knows if you're a dog. Everybody knows if you're a jackass. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
South Carolina Senate Race
A complete unknown who didn't campaign, give a speech or make any signs wins the South Carolina Democratic Senate race. After giving the party a shock (the leading, now defeated, candidate, Vic Rawl, was readying for the general election), it was discovered that Alvin Greene has a pending felony charge. Supposedly, he has refused to withdraw from the race. OK, so what can the South Carolina Democratic Party do?
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eh, just run him. If he won the primary without campaigning at all imagine what he'll do to Jim DeMint*.
*assuming DeMint's oh-so-predictable gay sex scandal** breaks before he gets re-elected. **yes, I'm serious. |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's some video, because you just have to see this with your own eyes.
http://www.wistv.com/global/video/fl...o&rnd=36830072 He'll probably be edged out, if not though he says he looks forward to having a televised debate with Demint, and that is something I think we all need to see. |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has the result been compared with exit polls as a sanity check?
Florida's famous "butterfly ballot" was a real problem. Machine fraud and malfunction are real problems; could something like that be at work here? |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Makin' the copies... [/Rob Schneider] |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/06/...-camille-mccoy
The mother of the victim on a crusade to derail his candidacy. Very interesting article. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought it was traditional for the mods to explain that they merged threads when they merge threads.
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Modding
I merged Jormungandr's thread into this one, which started yesterday.
EDIT: Hold your horses, Really Not All That Bright.
Last edited by Marley23; 06-10-2010 at 09:01 AM. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
In b4 explanation!
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
What happened to tolerance? What horrors did those folks endure that made them so demented as to have relations with an animal?
I suspect someone in the GOP realized the way the ballots would be printed, found a rube, gave him 10k, and told him to go be the everyman candidate. Nice protection against incumbent backlash. ETA: Besides, the guy is already learning the world of politics! Quote:
Last edited by Spit; 06-10-2010 at 10:06 AM. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even if the guy was a plant or rube of the South Carolina Republicans--apparently a hundred thousand people voted for him, an eighteen-point margin.*
I also don't buy that such a thing happens only by random or alphabetic effect. There had to have been a substantial number of people voting against the other guy, if only on the basis that they sort of recognized his name as being that of a politician; Rawl's own campaigning might have hurt him! This was literally a vote for nobody. Well, either that, or a vote for Love and Happiness. ![]() Does anyone have a link for actual/original reporting on what has been repeated (verbatim, without names) in several recent articles, that Quote:
* We think; is there any physical record of votes in SC? Last edited by Peremensoe; 06-10-2010 at 11:45 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|