The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Elections

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:48 AM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Political nobody wins SC Democratic US Senate nomination in strangest political upset of the year.

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/06/...south-carolina

This article poses a question many of us in South Carolina are asking tonight, who the heck is Alvin Greene?

To call this an upset is a bit of an understatement. And before you assume this may be another case of the supposed anti-establishment fever sweeping the nation, take note that nobody has ever even seen this supposed candidate and the leading theory is that people just blindly voted for the first name alphabetically. He was so nervous and obviously unprepared when the media came to him for comment that he could only speak in unintelligible gibberish.

I've never seen anyone express any kind of dissatisfaction with Vic Rawl, who obviously had a well put together campaign. There was never a moment of doubt that he would beat the guy who didn't even have a campaign website, well it looks like the joke is on us. Sources say the Demint people are falling asleep tonight with giant grins on their faces.

So do people really vote randomly in races they know nothing about? Can someone really be the victim of a bad name in the nomination for a position as high profile as US Senator? I'd understand if this as a party runoff for railroad commissioner or neighborhood dog catcher, but come on!

Can some of you politically astute people please tel me what the heck just happened?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-09-2010, 06:53 AM
Jonathan Chance Jonathan Chance is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the run with Kilroy.
Posts: 14,828
It's weird, don't get me wrong. But it's not like it matters. DeMint will walk away with that one regardless of who the D nominee is.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2010, 07:32 AM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Damn, reading that story, he makes Sarah Palin sound like George Plimpton.

Quote:
"It wasn’t much, I mean, just, it was—it wasn’t much. Not much, I mean, it wasn’t much," he said, when asked how much of his own money he spent in the primary. Greene frequently spoke in rapid-fire, fragmentary sentences, repeating certain phrases or interrupting himself multiple times during the same sentence while he searched for the right words. But he was emphatic about certain aspects of his candidacy, insisting that details about his campaign organization, for instance, weren't relevant. "I'm not concentrating on how I was elected—it's history. I’m the Democratic nominee—we need to get talking about America back to work, what's going on, in America."
I'm sure Sen. Demint is probably laughing his ass off right now, but in a race which he was likely to win anyway, it's not like it mattered who the Democratic nominee was going to be.

Last edited by joebuck20; 06-09-2010 at 07:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2010, 08:25 AM
Bricker Bricker is online now
And Full Contact Origami
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 37,608
Quote:
South Carolina Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler speculated that Greene won because his name appeared first on the ballot, and voters unfamiliar with both candidates chose alphabetically.
Aaron Aaronson, your country needs you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2010, 08:39 AM
Ponch8 Ponch8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bricker View Post
Aaron Aaronson, your country needs you.
The biggest gossip in town, along with Mr. Zykowski.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2010, 08:43 AM
Mr. Excellent Mr. Excellent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Not cool, Mr. Greene. Not cool. Even if Demint's a shoe-in for this race - if you weren't prepared to be a capable, articulate spokesman for the Democratic Party, you had no business seeking the nomination.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:20 AM
Kolga Kolga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,902
South Carolina politics continues to be the laughingstock of America. Joe "you lie" Wilson, state Senator Jake Knotts calling President Obama and gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley (Tea Party favorite accused of two different affairs) ragheads, the aforementioned Haley, and now this.

Just another in a long line of utterly bogus and mindbogglingly stupid South Carolina political events.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:23 AM
Ravenman Ravenman is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Barackington, DC
Posts: 11,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Excellent View Post
Not cool, Mr. Greene. Not cool. Even if Demint's a shoe-in for this race - if you weren't prepared to be a capable, articulate spokesman for the Democratic Party, you had no business seeking the nomination.
From the article, he appears to have done absolutely nothing whatsoever to win the nomination other than putting his name on the ballot. If a professional politician can't beat someone who does nothing to win the primary, then they have only themselves to blame.

I think it is more embarrassing for Vic Rawl to be beaten by this complete unknown than it would be to be beaten by a dead man. At least a dead man gets his name in the paper. Mr. Greene can't even get his name in the obituaries.

Does anyone know if South Carolina has open or closed primaries?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:33 AM
Mr. Excellent Mr. Excellent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenman View Post
From the article, he appears to have done absolutely nothing whatsoever to win the nomination other than putting his name on the ballot. If a professional politician can't beat someone who does nothing to win the primary, then they have only themselves to blame.

I think it is more embarrassing for Vic Rawl to be beaten by this complete unknown than it would be to be beaten by a dead man. At least a dead man gets his name in the paper. Mr. Greene can't even get his name in the obituaries.

Does anyone know if South Carolina has open or closed primaries?
Agreed, Rawl is to blame for losing this thing. Greene, however, is to blame for winning it when he knew or should have known that he didn't have what it takes to run a real campaign.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:35 AM
Duke Duke is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebuck20 View Post
I'm sure Sen. Demint is probably laughing his ass off right now, but in a race which he was likely to win anyway, it's not like it mattered who the Democratic nominee was going to be.
DeMint is favored to win, sure, but even in South Carolina he hasn't won by impressive margins in the past. As I mentioned in the "potential 2012 GOP candidates" thread, in 2006 he actually lost the first Republican primary, then won the runoff primary, and in the general election he couldn't even take a double-digit win, in one of the redder states in the country. It's a stretch to say DeMint is vulnerable, but he was not expected to win by landslide margins either.

This is truly a weird story. Almost like Head of State, but with the candidate being nowhere near as funny as Chris Rock.

Last edited by Duke; 06-09-2010 at 09:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:44 AM
Gyrate Gyrate is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolga View Post
South Carolina politics continues to be the laughingstock of America. Joe "you lie" Wilson, state Senator Jake Knotts calling President Obama and gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley (Tea Party favorite accused of two different affairs) ragheads, the aforementioned Haley, and now this.
You forgot Mark "hiking the Appalachian Trail" Sanford and Andre "poor people are like animals" Bauer. South Carolina is gaining on Glenn Beck in the "Most Appearances on The Daily Show" competition.

And of course it's always worth mentioning the guy with the horse (Twice! With the same horse!).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:55 AM
Simplicio Simplicio is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Excellent View Post
Not cool, Mr. Greene. Not cool. Even if Demint's a shoe-in for this race - if you weren't prepared to be a capable, articulate spokesman for the Democratic Party, you had no business seeking the nomination.
I dunno, everyones always grumbling that we could pull random people off the street and they'd be better then our current crop of politicians, now we have.

I kinda hope someone helps Mr Greene make a go of it. He won't win unless DeMint gets caught giving blow-jobs in the mens room, but you figure the national party can make some hay out of the guys story (thirteen year military veteran returns to the US in the middle of the Recession, can't get a break, decides to make a quixotic run for office), especially in the current anti-elitist environment.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2010, 10:02 AM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenman View Post
From the article, he appears to have done absolutely nothing whatsoever to win the nomination other than putting his name on the ballot. If a professional politician can't beat someone who does nothing to win the primary, then they have only themselves to blame.

I think it is more embarrassing for Vic Rawl to be beaten by this complete unknown than it would be to be beaten by a dead man. At least a dead man gets his name in the paper. Mr. Greene can't even get his name in the obituaries.

Does anyone know if South Carolina has open or closed primaries?
Well see I'd been following the race a little, and I really don't see what else Vic Rawl could have done. He was an entirely qualified candidate and his campaign was competent and focused. He traveled around plenty, wasn't really objectionable in any way, his online presence was decent with arms on Facebook and Twitter. Anyone who took a moment of observation in the race knew there was a serious candidate and one guy who nobody could even find any information on, Alvin Greene may as well have been Bigfoot as far as visibility was concerned.


The only thing I can think is that the race was so low profile and people so apathetic and uninformed that they picked at random in the voting booth. I've seen this phenomenon before, I even did it myself in my first few elections until I wised up and realized that was a terrible thing to do. Basically you go to the ballot knowing a race or two you are interested in, but there are all these extra contests you don't know about so treat it like a multiple choice test that you are trying to complete before the time is up. The correct thing to do in that situation of course is just leave those spots blank, but many people don't even realize you can do that.

Still though, most people involved in politics know that this happens and can account for some scattershot votes, but to actually decide a party nomination for US Senate of all things? Something doesn't seem right here at all.

South Carolina has an open primary. Obviously the majority votes on the Republican ballot, especially at a time like this when the R side was especially attention grabbing with several key races people wanted to vote on, I suspect it even drug away a number of our Democrats who wanted to have a say in the headline races. The Republican ballot was pretty long and even had a few policy questions on the ballot, the Democratic ballot was pretty boring let me tell you, there were three low profile races on mine, none of them very contested or interesting. So yea there was a pretty shallow pool of voters here, probably had something to do with the result.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-09-2010, 10:03 AM
Kolga Kolga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyrate View Post
You forgot Mark "hiking the Appalachian Trail" Sanford and Andre "poor people are like animals" Bauer.
Yea, I figured those were so well-known they went without saying. I'm not sure how many people knew about the "raghead" comment, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyrate View Post
South Carolina is gaining on Glenn Beck in the "Most Appearances on The Daily Show" competition.
I'm so proud of my home state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyrate View Post
And of course it's always worth mentioning the guy with the horse (Twice! With the same horse!).
I think that guy is from Georgia.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-09-2010, 10:13 AM
Gyrate Gyrate is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolga View Post
I think that guy is from Georgia.
Nope. To quote Jon Stewart, "world's most alluring horse".

Back on topic: it'll be interesting to see what Mr Greene does next with the weight of the party behind him and presumably a bit more money to spend. I'm guessing the DNC will at least get the guy a new suit and a PR coach.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:04 AM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
South Carolina . . . It's nice to know somebody is there to make Florida politics look good!

Last edited by BrainGlutton; 06-09-2010 at 11:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:10 AM
obfusciatrist obfusciatrist is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Didn't Eddie Murphy already make this movie?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:21 AM
Marley23 Marley23 is online now
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 69,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyrate View Post
Back on topic: it'll be interesting to see what Mr Greene does next with the weight of the party behind him and presumably a bit more money to spend. I'm guessing the DNC will at least get the guy a new suit and a PR coach.
I'm sure they'll back him, but I'm thinking the DNC is not going to spend too much money or time on a hopeless race. State organizations might do more for the guy but the DNC will probably do the bare minimum. What a weird story.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:41 AM
Simplicio Simplicio is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marley23 View Post
I'm sure they'll back him, but I'm thinking the DNC is not going to spend too much money or time on a hopeless race. State organizations might do more for the guy but the DNC will probably do the bare minimum. What a weird story.
He's enough of a novelty, though, to be able to get a decent amount of buzz and name-recognition without having to actually pay for TV ads and the like. And you figure there must be some just starting-out political operatives out there who would work for cheap to have the chance to run a (admittedly doomed) Senatorial Campaign rather then having to spend the season as a low level functionary on a "real" campaign. Assuming the guy turns out to be relatively sympathetic (and who knows, he might turn out to be a rabid anti-semite, or have some crazy pet conspiracy theory or something, which would obviously necessitate the party ditching him), he could give the national party some good press, and make the GOP spend some money on an otherwise safe senate seat, even if he never gets close to winning.

The guy that ran Fred Tuttle's campaign could make a doucumentray out of it and help make it worth Greene's while.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:09 PM
An Arky An Arky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,325
Open Primary, natch. Hoo boy, them 'ol boys pulled a goodun', votin' fer (someone they perceive to be a) Stepin Fetchit. HAW HAW HAW, they done messed with them commie faggots in Warshington now!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:21 PM
An Arky An Arky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,325
Seriously, in a not-too-hot primary in a not-so-big state, somebody can win just by nailing a couple of key districts, so I'd say it's a vagary of party primary politics and non-compulsary elections, among other things...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:34 PM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Well the plot thickens.
http://www.wltx.com/news/local/story...=88409&catid=2

Dude's got a pending felony charge. Great. It'd sure be interesting to be a fly on the wall at a state party meeting right now. I know there was only a 5% chance of the Demint losing anyway, but dammit I wanted my 5% chance!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:49 PM
Oakminster Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyclopticXander View Post
Well the plot thickens.
http://www.wltx.com/news/local/story...=88409&catid=2

Dude's got a pending felony charge. Great. It'd sure be interesting to be a fly on the wall at a state party meeting right now. I know there was only a 5% chance of the Demint losing anyway, but dammit I wanted my 5% chance!
From the link:

He's accused of showing Internet photos to a University of South Carolina student. The felony charge carries up to five years in prison.

WTF kinda crime is that? If the gal is in college, she's most likely old enough to see porn and/or copulate at will.

Last edited by Oakminster; 06-09-2010 at 01:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:56 PM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyclopticXander View Post
Well the plot thickens.
http://www.wltx.com/news/local/story...=88409&catid=2

Dude's got a pending felony charge. Great. It'd sure be interesting to be a fly on the wall at a state party meeting right now. I know there was only a 5% chance of the Demint losing anyway, but dammit I wanted my 5% chance!
An obscenity charge - that's going to sting.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:10 PM
Duke Duke is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakminster View Post
WTF kinda crime is that? If the gal is in college, she's most likely old enough to see porn and/or copulate at will.
This was South Carolina. Judging by Gyrate's post earlier, this could be a Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino* thing.

*Yes, that is officially his name now. Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:15 PM
BigT BigT is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebuck20 View Post
An obscenity charge - that's going to sting.
You know they aren't going to play up that portion of it. The word felony is in there, and that's going to hurt. What might be useful is to use it to bar him from the full race, putting Vic Rawl back in if the DNC thinks he has better chances. Then again, if people would rather vote for a complete unknown rather than you, I'd guess you aren't well liked.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:23 PM
Oakminster Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke View Post
This was South Carolina. Judging by Gyrate's post earlier, this could be a Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino* thing.

*Yes, that is officially his name now. Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino.

Let the record reflect that I said "Eww" in as masculine a manner as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:29 PM
hajario hajario is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 12,120
This is hilarious, or it would be if..... nah, it's still hilarious.

BTW, he's not going to get squat from the DNC unless his poll numbers are good enough. A good friend of mine was the Dem candidate for Congress a few years back in a district where the GOP candidate has handily won for decades. He was told that he would get money for having poll numbers at a certain level at certain times. He did get lots of free advice from some high profile people but that was it at the national level.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:35 PM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 48,251
I'm not sure I buy the "voting randomly" or "voting alphabetically" argument. I'd expect that the sorts of people who would turn out for an off-year primary election would be at least somewhat informed on the candidates (even if that "information" consists of just knowing who their media of choice told them to vote for), and US Senator has to be pretty close to the top of the ballot. I'd think that the people who genuinely didn't know who either candidate was, or who didn't care, would just stay home.

The only scenario that seems plausible to me is that this was driven by cross-party votes from folks who actually support DeMint, and want him to face the weakest opposition possible.


The whole thing reminds me of the US Representative general election here in Montana, two years ago. The Democratic challenger to Republican incumbent Denny Rehberg literally spent zero dollars on his campaign. He had no ads, no fliers, even his official campaign website was on a free webhost. If he had any sort of word-of-mouth operation going, it was a pretty pathetic one, given that it didn't even penetrate to this college town. He didn't win, but he did manage to take about a third of the vote, which says to me that a third of Montanans will either blindly vote for whichever name has a D next to it, or really hate Rehberg.
__________________
Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
--As You Like It, III:ii:328
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-09-2010, 03:03 PM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2010_...0867602&page=2

Apparently he was kicked out of the army as well, unflattering stuff is coming out pretty quickly now since candidates thought to have no chance of winning don't get vetted that well.

A Columbia station did an interview with him today that they will be airing tonight, so we'll have some video soon to see just how trainwrecky the situation is.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-09-2010, 03:28 PM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...enate-race.php

And even crazier, the party is now asking him to step down. Just bizarre.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-09-2010, 03:31 PM
Oakminster Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
I dunno anything about Rawl, but he's gotta be feeling like something the cat did and forgot to cover up about now.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-09-2010, 04:32 PM
Damuri Ajashi Damuri Ajashi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
I haven't stopped laughing since I read this.

BTW how many senators from south carolina have been black felons?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-09-2010, 04:41 PM
Marley23 Marley23 is online now
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 69,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damuri Ajashi View Post
BTW how many senators from south carolina have been black felons?
South Carolina has never had a black senator, so I'm going to guess the number is approximately zero.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-09-2010, 04:56 PM
Snowboarder Bo Snowboarder Bo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke View Post
This was South Carolina. Judging by Gyrate's post earlier, this could be a Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino* thing.

*Yes, that is officially his name now. Carl "HORSE PORN" Paladino.
I heard he prefers Carl "INTERSPECIES EROTICA" Paladino. And Randall says the horse's name is Kelly.

Last edited by Snowboarder Bo; 06-09-2010 at 04:57 PM. Reason: I just really like to edit.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-09-2010, 06:41 PM
waterj2 waterj2 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damuri Ajashi View Post
I haven't stopped laughing since I read this.

BTW how many senators from south carolina have been black felons?
I'm pretty sure that even implying such a thing about a South Carolina senator would get one savagely beaten with a cane.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-09-2010, 06:44 PM
Peremensoe Peremensoe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakminster View Post
WTF kinda crime is that? If the gal is in college, she's most likely old enough to see porn and/or copulate at will.
It has nothing to do with her age. You're not allowed to go around showing pornography to adults against their will.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-09-2010, 08:09 PM
Steve MB Steve MB is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 8,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyrate View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolga View Post
I think that guy is from Georgia.
Nope. To quote Jon Stewart, "world's most alluring horse".
The Georgia one was a mule.
__________________
The Internet: Nobody knows if you're a dog. Everybody knows if you're a jackass.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:15 PM
Jormungandr Jormungandr is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
South Carolina Senate Race

A complete unknown who didn't campaign, give a speech or make any signs wins the South Carolina Democratic Senate race. After giving the party a shock (the leading, now defeated, candidate, Vic Rawl, was readying for the general election), it was discovered that Alvin Greene has a pending felony charge. Supposedly, he has refused to withdraw from the race. OK, so what can the South Carolina Democratic Party do?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-09-2010, 10:44 PM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Eh, just run him. If he won the primary without campaigning at all imagine what he'll do to Jim DeMint*.

*assuming DeMint's oh-so-predictable gay sex scandal** breaks before he gets re-elected.

**yes, I'm serious.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-10-2010, 04:51 AM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Here's some video, because you just have to see this with your own eyes.

http://www.wistv.com/global/video/fl...o&rnd=36830072

He'll probably be edged out, if not though he says he looks forward to having a televised debate with Demint, and that is something I think we all need to see.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-10-2010, 05:59 AM
septimus septimus is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Has the result been compared with exit polls as a sanity check?

Florida's famous "butterfly ballot" was a real problem. Machine fraud and malfunction are real problems; could something like that be at work here?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-10-2010, 07:22 AM
What the .... ?!?! What the .... ?!?! is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyclopticXander View Post
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...enate-race.php

And even crazier, the party is now asking him to step down. Just bizarre.
I'm sure that Rahm can find a little something for him to do. Don't they have some positions to fill since Sestak and the Colorado guy both turned them down.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-10-2010, 07:32 AM
Gyrate Gyrate is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the .... ?!?! View Post
I'm sure that Rahm can find a little something for him to do. Don't they have some positions to fill since Sestak and the Colorado guy both turned them down.
[Rob Schneider]

Makin' the copies...

[/Rob Schneider]
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-10-2010, 08:53 AM
CyclopticXander CyclopticXander is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/06/...-camille-mccoy

The mother of the victim on a crusade to derail his candidacy. Very interesting article.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-10-2010, 08:59 AM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
I thought it was traditional for the mods to explain that they merged threads when they merge threads.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-10-2010, 09:00 AM
Marley23 Marley23 is online now
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 69,256
Modding

I merged Jormungandr's thread into this one, which started yesterday.

EDIT: Hold your horses, Really Not All That Bright.

Last edited by Marley23; 06-10-2010 at 09:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-10-2010, 09:31 AM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
In b4 explanation!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-10-2010, 10:03 AM
Spit Spit is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
What happened to tolerance? What horrors did those folks endure that made them so demented as to have relations with an animal?

I suspect someone in the GOP realized the way the ballots would be printed, found a rube, gave him 10k, and told him to go be the everyman candidate. Nice protection against incumbent backlash.

ETA: Besides, the guy is already learning the world of politics!

Quote:
"The people have spoken. We need to be pro-South Carolina, not anti-Greene." -Alvin Greene

Last edited by Spit; 06-10-2010 at 10:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-10-2010, 11:43 AM
Peremensoe Peremensoe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Even if the guy was a plant or rube of the South Carolina Republicans--apparently a hundred thousand people voted for him, an eighteen-point margin.*

I also don't buy that such a thing happens only by random or alphabetic effect. There had to have been a substantial number of people voting against the other guy, if only on the basis that they sort of recognized his name as being that of a politician; Rawl's own campaigning might have hurt him!

This was literally a vote for nobody.

Well, either that, or a vote for Love and Happiness.

Does anyone have a link for actual/original reporting on what has been repeated (verbatim, without names) in several recent articles, that
Quote:
Republican place markers in Palmetto State Democratic primaries are campaign legend.

In the early ‘90s, a Republican strategist was prosecuted and forced to pay a fine when he was found to have coaxed an unemployed black fisherman into running in a primary race to increase white turnout at the polls in a Lowcountry congressional race. The political operative paid the man’s filing fee.

* We think; is there any physical record of votes in SC?

Last edited by Peremensoe; 06-10-2010 at 11:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.