I know…shocking. It seems that the Cuban Model (Cuban Communist system I presume) isn’t working ‘anymore’…even for the Cuban’s. Well, if you can believe the source, which is the notorious right wing conservative and anti-Communist firebrand, Fidel Castro.
The debate isn’t really about whether or not Communism (Cuban or otherwise) ‘works’…but more about whether or not this will finally make the die hard element ADMIT that it doesn’t work ‘anymore’.
Communism and capitalism are both too idealistic. We need something in-between that works.
-A free but well-regulated consumer market
-Free and lightly-regulated press
-Partially or fully subsidized higher education and healthcare
-Major campaign finance reforms to give more non-career politicians and “outsiders” a chance to hold elected offices
-Reasonable/practical protections for jobs and manufacturing (example: if it’s illegal to pay someone $4 per day here, a company should not be able to just move overseas and pay that wage in some country where it’s legal.)
I’ve thought the Cuban model hasn’t been working for years.
But why should it be automatically proven because Castro said so? Presumedly a lot of the people who think Cuba isn’t working are also people who distrust Castro. Why should you cite him as a trustworthy authority now just because he’s saying something you happen to agree with?
My assumption is that Castro has his own ulterior motives for saying the Cuban model isn’t working and his statement is no more trustworthy on its own than anything he has said in the past.
No, I can’t say I have. For one thing, I like my women a bit older. For another, I like my women to be, um, more rounded, which probably lets out most Cuban prostitutes. I am, however, willing to do some extensive testing, if grant money can be obtained. I’m also willing to sample (in the name of science of course) a selection of fine Cuban cigars from around the country as well.
(Of course, what you quoted there was talking about the ‘fucked up system’ which has no redeeming qualities to it…not the Cuban people or things made in Cuba. I LOVE Cuban cigars, and could probably find a nice 30-40 something prostitute that meets my exacting standards as well :p)
My understanding is all the other communist nations (except north korea) abandoned economic communism decades ago. Laos, Vietnam & China are all more free market economies operating under the heading of communism.
However that isn’t to say that regulation against abuses is a bad thing. Or that social safety nets are a bad thing. However in the west communism is used as an umbrella term to criticize nearly everything (labor laws, environmental laws, universal health care).
I think what makes it newsworthy is that this kind of statement has never been made by any Cuban official, least of all the father of the Cuban revolution. Yes, he’s just confirming what everyone, in Cuba and abroad, already knows, but now this truth is spoken. It should also be remembered that in Cuba it is illegal to criticize the Cuban government, this is the crime of ‘desacato’, or disrespect. However now that Castro himself has paved the way, it might become more accepted to do so in Cuba.
Then again, this might also be Fidel’s way to insert himself back into the government. His younger (79 years old), brother has been running the country since 2006, so maybe all Fidel is saying is that Raul’s government is not working.
From “Waiting for the Next Revolution,” by Jordana Timerman, who visited Cuba in 2008 in search of on-the-ground speculation about a post-Castro future:
So, at least to one old woman who remembers the Batista days, the system must have some redeeming qualities. FWIW.
Personally, I read it as the reverse. Raul has been experimenting with some reforms to the system (granted, reasonably minor reforms). To me, when Fidel acknowledged the old style system wasn’t working, he was implying reforms were needed. Which is a nice way to try and make sure the most die hard elements of Cubans stay off Raul’s back.