The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Elections

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:28 AM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
Connecticut election

http://blog.ctnews.com/election2010/...n-latest-poll/ OK people of Connecticut ,what's going on. Linda McMahon whose claim to fame is she married the heir to a wrestling corporate legacy is tied with Blumenthal for senate. Why? What are the points of debate ?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 09-30-2010, 12:15 PM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
What do you mean, "tied"?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2010, 12:36 PM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
I read a poll that said they are within poll error. Even in that list they can cherry pick the one that has them 3 points apart.
Her claim to fame is marrying a wrestling mogul. Wrestlers of course can make a few bucks at the cost of their lives, so many die young. They have in a sense gotten rich off young people who have given their lives to steroids and human growth serum.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2010, 12:58 PM
Brad the Impaler Brad the Impaler is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
I've been doing door to doors and phone banking for Blumenthal's campaign, and here are some of the reasons I've heard for McMahon.

I like wrestling.
She's run a successful business.
Obama is ruining the country.
We need new leaders in Congress.
Blumenthal is a liar.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2010, 01:22 PM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad the Impaler View Post
I've been doing door to doors and phone banking for Blumenthal's campaign, and here are some of the reasons I've heard for McMahon.

I like wrestling.
You're making this up, right?

Please?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2010, 02:59 PM
Brad the Impaler Brad the Impaler is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainGlutton View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad the Impaler View Post
I've been doing door to doors and phone banking for Blumenthal's campaign, and here are some of the reasons I've heard for McMahon.

I like wrestling.
You're making this up, right?

Please?
Nope. But that was just one person, it isn't a regular answer. I've actually had more people say hating wresting is why they won't vote for her, which is just as dumb a reason. Not WWE the company, anything like that. I think they vote against her TV character.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2010, 03:30 PM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad the Impaler View Post
I think they vote against her TV character.
Well, we all do that, in almost every election. What else ya gonna do? Can't actually meet all the candidates, and few of us have the time or inclination to seriously study them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2010, 03:40 PM
WreckingCrew WreckingCrew is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainGlutton View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad the Impaler View Post
I think they vote against her TV character.
Well, we all do that, in almost every election. What else ya gonna do? Can't actually meet all the candidates, and few of us have the time or inclination to seriously study them.
No, I think they are referring to when Linda used to be on the WWF shows. She once kicked Vince in the crotch during a Wrestlemania.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2010, 06:24 PM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by WreckingCrew View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainGlutton View Post

Well, we all do that, in almost every election. What else ya gonna do? Can't actually meet all the candidates, and few of us have the time or inclination to seriously study them.
No, I think they are referring to when Linda used to be on the WWF shows. She once kicked Vince in the crotch during a Wrestlemania.
That is a reason to vote for her.


What do you call yourselves Connectiganders? Connecticans?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2010, 06:44 PM
Kiros Kiros is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hartford
Posts: 2,058
Blumenthal was a highly popular AG in the state for almost 20 years, and was a prohibitive favorite as soon as he announced for the race. He was maintaining a lead of 30+ points against all potential Republican opponents in early polling. Then, the New York Times Vietnam story came out, and the downward spiral started. Even shortly after he was still polling fairly well, but it may have just taken the numbers a bit to catch up; he finally stabilized at about a 5-10 point lead. He's still a pretty big favorite to win - FiveThirtyEight has him at a 92% chance to take the election as of their most recent update to the Senate forecasts.

Another big factor is that McMahon has been throwing money around at a near-record pace: for all that you hear about Whitman in CA, McMahon has spent something like $18 million on the campaign as of 6/30 and I'm sure another several million since, between the hard-fought primary and the general. You can't change the channel without seeing either Linda with a lunch pail telling us how she wants to get people back to work, or seeing an ad bashing "Dick Blumenthal" in one way or another. Personally, I'd like to go back to the ad that one of her primary competitors was showing that was just her kicking Vince in the crotch over and over again, but I'm all for cheap thrills like that.

And, yeah, there's both the backlash against Obama and the "I like wrestling!" factors going on, too. I'm not a huge fan of Blumenthal, either, but I look forward to coloring in his little circle in one of the few races I've ever voted in that wasn't a foregone conclusion.

Connecticutians, if you must, but really, you don't need to.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-30-2010, 06:48 PM
Regallag_The_Axe Regallag_The_Axe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Linda McMahon has been throwing TONS of money into political ads. Most of them are along the lines of 'Washington is killing jobs with all their Liberal laws. I'm going to go in there and change things.' I've only seen one ad form Blumey, and I believe it was during the primary. Maybe I'm just watching the wrong channels, but even ads that offer no specifics about what the candidate wants to do will have an impact on the campaign.

On a somewhat related note, Linda seems like the republican equivalent of Ned Lamont. Both are absurdly rich. Both seem to have decided, 'I have all the money, now I'm going for power.'


gonzomax, I keep insisting that we call ourselves 'Connecticats', but no else seems to agree, so we have to go with the vastly inferior 'nutmeggers'.
ETA: Kiros, Connecticutian just sounds so stuffy and dull. Connecticats all the way, baby!

Last edited by Regallag_The_Axe; 09-30-2010 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:52 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,632
No discussion about her statements about minimum wage today? First, she doesn't know how much it is. Second, she thinks it's worth looking into lowering it.

Last edited by Boyo Jim; 09-30-2010 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-2010, 11:47 AM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
The stance is simple. If it helps the little people, the Repubs are against it. It is their money after all.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-2010, 09:39 PM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzomax View Post
What do you call yourselves Connectiganders? Connecticans?
Connectdedots?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-02-2010, 10:09 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 10,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzomax View Post
http://blog.ctnews.com/election2010/...n-latest-poll/ OK people of Connecticut ,what's going on. Linda McMahon whose claim to fame is she married the heir to a wrestling corporate legacy is tied with Blumenthal for senate. Why? What are the points of debate ?
Whether she is tied or not, that she is even in the race is sad and embarrassing. I get daily glurge mail from her at home. Enough already. I'm not voting for her, leave me alone.

I couldn't believe she won the primary. Blumenthal has done so much for the state as AG, I can't believe he's being brought down by this piece of work.

ETA: We're nutmeggers, as we're the nutmeg state. Or Connecticutters, but I prefer nutmeggers. I actually really, really like nutmeggers!

Last edited by IvoryTowerDenizen; 10-02-2010 at 10:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-02-2010, 10:18 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,632
Blumenthal is one of the recent group who've been discovered lying about their military service.

This doesn't explain how McMahon got through the primary, but when you look at some of the other fruitcakes who won Republican primaries, I'm not sure any further explanation is necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:55 PM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
Just when you thought the long nightmare was over, McMahon has said she is thinking about taking on Lieberman in 2 years. Here we go again. Another 50 million on a political campaign. She must want it bad.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-20-2010, 07:05 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 10,588
God no. I got something in the mail everyday from her. Couldn't stand it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.