The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Elections

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2010, 10:55 AM
New Deal Democrat New Deal Democrat is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: north east USA
Posts: 1,992
Scenarios for the next election and beyond

It looks like the Democrats are going to do badly in the next election. The only real questions are: how badly? and what comes next? I can think of four scenarios for the future, and solicit comments on them.

1. The Roosevelt scenario. It is unfortunately too late for this, but this is what should have happened. Shortly after his inauguration in 1933 Franklin Roosevelt began the Civilian Conservation Corps. This hired people at government expense to do necessary work that the private sector was not addressing. It was enormously popular with the public. People hired by the CCC earned pay checks. They bought things. In order to supply those things, private employers hired people to make them, bringing the unemployment rate lower. In the Congressional election of 1934 the Democrats picked up nine seats in each house of Congress.

When Obama's approval rating was close to 70% he should have raised the top tax rate, and done something like that. Instead, he worked on a health plan most Americans do not like, as the unemployment rate continued to rise.

2. The Carter scenario. This, of course, is what Republicans expect and desire. The Democrats will do poorly in the next election. A Republican will be elected president in 2012. With the support of a Republican Congress, he will move the country in a sharply rightward direction.

3. The Clinton scenario. The Republicans will regain both houses of Congress in the next election, but the economy will improve, and President Obama will be reelected in 2012. Nevertheless, he will be unable to transform the country.

4. The Reagan scenario reversed. Because it is too late for the Roosevelt scenario, this is what I hope for. In November 1982 the unemployment rate was over one percentage point higher than it is now. The Democrats picked up 25 seats in the House of Representatives, but lost one seat in the Senate. Nevertheless, the economy did improve, Reagan was reelected by a landslide, and he transformed the country.

5. My scenario. This is what I think is most likely. It is similar to the Carter scenario. Reagan was saved by a decline in the world price of petroleum. Clinton was helped by the development of the internet, and the widespread sale and use of personal computers. I do not see anything comparable happening in the near future. To the contrary, I think a number of historical advantages have given out for the United States, and that the country faces irreversible economic decline.

I expect the Republicans to sweep the next election, regaining large majorities in both houses of Congress. The GOP will prevent President Obama from doing anything to deal with our economic problems. The economy will get worse. In 2012 a Republican will be elected in a landslide, and a solidly Republican Congress will enable him to pass anything he wants to.

Whenever the Republicans have dominated the country, the rich got richer. In the past most of everyone else benefited somewhat, although not nearly as much as the rich. In a declining economy benefits for the rich will mean that nearly everyone else declines. I do not think that is politically sustainable.

If the electorate decides that economic growth is no longer possible, it may opt for economic redistribution. That will benefit the Democrats. On the other hand, the Republicans may hold on to power by continuing to make successful appeals to white racial solidarity.

Last edited by New Deal Democrat; 10-04-2010 at 10:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-04-2010, 01:40 PM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 47,968
Quote:
Whenever the Republicans have dominated the country, the rich got richer.
And whenever Democrats have dominated the country, the rich got richer, too, and by about the same amount. The difference isn't in what happens to the rich, but what happens to everyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2010, 03:38 PM
BrainGlutton BrainGlutton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Quote:
Whenever the Republicans have dominated the country, the rich got richer.
And whenever Democrats have dominated the country, the rich got richer, too . . .
True.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
. . . and by about the same amount.
False, I think.

Bear in mind that which party "dominates" the country in a given year is a matter of a general party system, not just who is POTUS. The U.S. was in a Republican-dominated party system from 1981 through 2009 -- even while Clinton was POTUS. I believe we are now on the cusp of the Seventh Party System, as argued in this thread and this thread.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.