|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which elections this year will be decided in the courts?
In the Florida gubernatorial election, Sink and Scott are still in such a dead heat, and the campaigning has been so bitter, that it's hard to imagine the loser not demanding a recount, and then it just escalates from there . . .
What others? |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a bit out there, but the Alaska race with Murkowski as a write-in could end up in the courts if it's close and there enough write-in votes in question. We could see a review of all ballots to determine voter intent.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
As for Reid v. Angle in Nevada, I'm sure both sides' court briefs are half-drafted already.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm going to take the bold stance and say none of them, with one exception. These are my pronostications: Reid will win by larger than a razor thin margin in Nevada because having six more years of Reid is better than having six years of a crazy Tea Party member. The gubernatorial race in Florida will also be taken by the Dem (although Rubio is going to win against Crist and especially Meek by a double digit margin in the Senate).
As far as the Alaska senate race, however: If Murkowski loses by a razor thin edge there may be an interesting court battle on the write-in issue. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will the feds take any legal action if California legalizes maryjane? Maybe as a way of getting California to keep up its fair share of enforcement of weed eradication?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
With all the nasty and incredibly numerous ads, you could say the Supreme Court already has.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Senate race in Illinois is pretty close and Illinois is infamous for voting corruption, so if it's close enough, well who knows
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|