|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Converting Celsius to Fahrenheit
"At what temperature are the Fahrenheit and Celsius readings the same? People will look at you with newfound respect when you reveal the astonishing answer: minus 40."
Which explains why the easiest way to convert between the two scales (which for some inexplicable reason is not taught in schools) is this:
Done. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
And you didn't learn this in seventh grade?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Um, the actual conversion from C to F is multiply by 9/5 and add 32.
To go the other way, subtract 32 and multiply by 5/9. The easy way for most everyday temperatures is: C - F - double and add 30 F - C - subtract 30 and divide my 2. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
My formula is equivalent to yours and is correct (try it and see). I find it's just easier to remember and to compute than the one that's usually taught (yours).
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sure I could figure out algebraically why they're equivalent; however you are correct. I was never taught this method.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
They are equivalent because both are doing the same thing at a generic level.
1) Get a reference point where you know what the temperature is on both scales. 2) Find out how far the temperature you want to covert is above/below that point. 3) Multiple by the appropriate ratio for the direction of conversion 4) Add that to the reference point on the target scale. Using 32 and 0 is commonly taught because in one step you are just adding or subtracting zero. You can construct a formula with -40 (as shown upthread), with 100 and 212 or any other point where you know the tempature on both scales. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use this, which is easier now with smart phones and tablets.
It's tough hauling a desktop machine everywhere, what with its separate keyboard, heavy tower and 200 miles/321.8694 kilometers of extension cord. (I still do, though the extension cord causes problems at the U.S. border, but I'm old school.) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
For really old school, for anything where the units have a common "zero" point, just muliply by 1. The trick is that the "one" has to be a fraction where the numerator is in the target unit and the denominator is in the original unit.
Feet to inches use 12 inches / 1 foot or 36 inches / 3 feet, etc. Any place you know the equal values works. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm better at adding and subtracting than dividing, so I've always found that the easiest way for me to do a rough conversion in my head is to remember that 10 degrees C is 50 degrees F, and that for every 10 degrees C you add/substract 18 degrees F.
So... what is 25 degrees C in F? 50 + 18 + 9 = 77. Going the other way is nearly as easy. For every 20 degrees F you add/subtract 11 degrees C. So... what is 25 degrees F in C? 10 - 11 - 3 = -4. Maybe it's silly, but to each his own. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I see a Celsius temperature I throw the thermometer away and get a real one.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yup, 40' is the same for F and C. But, gee, whenever I tell people that, they just look at me like I'm a nerd.
It's a simple algebra problem, suitable for a first course. Mentally multiplying by 9/5 is easy: double, then subtract 1/10 of the doubled value. E.g.: 9/5 * 53 = 106 - 10.6 = 95.4 No doubt there's a good mental way to go the other way but I don't know it. Closest I can come is to halve the number and then add 1/9 of the halved number (but cheat, and add 1/10 as close enough). Anyway, I think it's easier to add or subtract 32, than to add 40 and then subtract it. Still, the add-40, subtract-40 trick is a nice one and no doubt some folks find it easier. Last edited by Learjeff; 09-07-2012 at 03:31 PM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember and use the formula
C = 5/9 (F-32) |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I run out to the car and punch the buttons to switch the dashboard readout/outside temperature display from metric to imperial.
Unless it's November to April. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are correct, that works. Thanks tim-n-va for the explanation.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nothing wrong with it, but remember that there have to be two formulae:
Code:
C = 5/9 (F - 32) F = 9/5 C + 32 Code:
C = 5/9 (F + 40) - 40 F = 9/5 (C + 40) - 40
__________________
John W. Kennedy "The blind rulers of Logres Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue." -- Charles Williams. Taliessin through Logres: Prelude |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But the trick with the standard formula is remembering which you add 32 and which you subtract 32, and which you 5/9 and which you 9/5. This alternate removes one of those complications, because you add then subtract 40 in both cases. Then you just have to keep straight the scaling factor. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
scaling is easy because you know F has 180 degrees and C 100; you then know if you want more degrees or fewer and then to multiply or divide by 1.8.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|