No, beyond the same potential mild analgesic effect that you get from any rendered animal fat. The idea that emu oil has unusual therapeutic properties derives from traditional Aboriginal medicine, so take it with the same grain of salt that you’d apply to claims about rhino horn.
I’m going to stick my neck out and say no.
I’ve used marmot cream and found it quite pleasant, while we’re on the topic of rendering down wildlife and rubbing it on ourselves.
I was looking at the thread title and thinking, “Electronic mass unit? European monetary union? Surely this can’t be about the large flightless bird. That would just be too weird…”
Umpty-ump years ago, I knew a fellow who was getting into raising emus. He said that emu oil was absorbed through the skin, and thus could help lubricate joints when applied topically. The following excerpt from an article at livestrong.com suggests that there is something to that.
*Emu Oil
Emu oil has been used by many cultures for centuries. It is gleaned from the skin of the emu and is an effective skin-penetrating oil. The oil is a good source of linoleic acid and was used to treat muscle, joint and skin problems. The oil is now added to certain cosmetic and skin care products. Emu oil is almost always used topically, and has anti-inflammatory properties that have the potential to treat various skin problems, including rashes, poison ivy and insect bites. The oil is also used as a skin moisturizer.
Research
According to Drugs.com, limited research exists suggesting that emu oil is effective as an anti-inflammatory agent. Other research indicates that emu oil might be effective at treating certain disorders because it is so readily absorbed by the skin. A study from the Texas Tech University Medical Center reports that emu oil can help treat burns as it penetrates the skin. A report from the 88th American Oil Chemists Society annual meeting reports that emu oil may help the skin absorb lidocaine three times as quickly as lidocaine on its own.*
See the cite in post #5. Not only is emu oil mentioned on the FDA’s “How to Spot Health Fraud” page, its the number 1 example. When “limited research” is “suggesting” something I equate that with snake oil. Which is the same as emu oil I guess.
I find it bizarre that so many people on this board would flippantly dismiss something that they apparently have no experience with. I have intermittent arthritis trouble in my hips. Blue Emu is one of the few creams I’ve tried that helps me.
It has more claim to being a “miracle drug” than most things that are touted as such. The difference it makes is well-nigh instantaneous.
This would be because anecdotes are not data. Actual RESEARCH indicates that there is no unusual virtue in emu oil as opposed to other animal oils. That you personally believe that you have achieved some sort of positive reaction from the application of emu oil does not mean that any such thing objectively happened or that, if it did, it was the animal the oil came from that made the difference.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) penetrates intact skin (a drop on your hand leads to a garlicky taste in seconds). It’s also inexpensive. And possibly toxic. There is concern that a solvent that penetrates intact skin can carry with it whatever was on the intact skin originally.
I’ve used emu lotion for years. I have bad knees and when one acts up rubbing emu on it noticeably reduces the discomfort for about 30 minutes. Aspercreme is actually more effective. I mostly use emu as a moisturizer because I work outdoors and it’s the best thing I’ve found, plus the odor keeps young beautiful women from swarming around me. Salmon oil capsules are good for arthur, 4-6 a day. Salmon oil, not fish oil, mind you. The placebo effect has been keeping me loose for years. Research will eventually show there is no placebo effect, just statistical noise, most research is either poorly done or biased so researchers oughtn’t to throw stones…