100 K More Troops for Iraq?

Somebody has simply got to be kidding. I don’t know who yet, because I picked this link off a blog leading to CBS News above, but nobody, but nobody seems to be talking about this. So maybe I’m Pitting CBS news for a wildly inaccurate news release. Which would be a relief, frankly.

But if I’m not, I’m pitting the dumbest fucking idea yet. Why do we need to do this?

WT bleeding F? One quarter of the Iraqi Army is on leave on "any given day"!

And who signed off on this? I cannot imagine that any Bushivik thought “You know, this close to the election, be a really good idea to float that “raise the troop level” thingy, bound to get just oodles of enthusiastic crunchy goodness!”

Anybody see something here that isn’t batshit pizza? Anybody?

Yeah, I do. I hate this war as much as anybody, but as long as we’re there, I’m ok with committing more troops. The way I see it is: would you rather walk through a bad neighborhood with 5 of your best friends or 500 of your best friends?

Until we find a way out of this clusterfuck, I’d like our men to be as safe as possible.

And the best way to keep our men safe is to put more of them in the war zone. Gotcha.

Now, where’s that March hare and the guy with the hat? They said something about a tea party.

Not taking advantage of strength in numbers was a fault we paid dearly for in Vietnam. You can hand-wave it all you want but it is legitimate military strategy.

I know. At the same time, I feel compelled to point out that the safety measures would probably result in a lot of people getting killed.

Just to be clear, it’s the Iraqi army, not the US army. ISF = Iraqi Security Forces.

Do you think they need fewer security folks?

I wonder if elucidator did think they meant US troops, but it’s still a rather drastic statement if the situation has deteriorated so much that the security was 100,000 too small.

What a relief! Its not 100K American troops, which means we won’t be pressing the Eagle Scouts into infantry. It just means that the 325,000 troops that were the big goal turns out to be about 100,000 short. What is that in Friedman Units?

But, yeah, I did misread that. Time to ramp up my Alzhiemer’s prevention program another notch. Stern virtue demands rigorous mental hygiene.

I recommend wine. I’ve got a nice crisp Chardonnay going right now. Saving the Port for later.

:smiley:

Are you sure it’s wise to drink chardonnay? You might catch teh liberal.

:smiley:

Turns out its not catastrophic news, merely dreadful. That’s better. Turns out this doesn’t mean more American troops, just the same ones. Longer. Goody. Swell.

Goddess Willing, I die of old age having never described a wine as “crisp”.

Well, that’s true of any wine. Tonight it’s a Chard, tomorrow a Pinot, and Wed will probably see a nice Cab.

As for Iraq, I think the real problem is the police, not so much the army. If you’re relying on the army to save your ass, you’re screwed. I wish we could divide the country into 3 zones, but I think that would make matters worse. Besides, it’s their counrty, not ours. “We” shoudln’t be dividing anything up, other than our own Congressional districts, and look what we’ve done with those.

If so, your life will be the poorer for it. Of course, you live in MN, not in CA. What would you do with a “crisp” wine there even if you had one? Swat a mosquito with it?

Eat your heart out.

A nice robust Chianti would go well with that.

Here you go, 'luc. No doubt you’ll get some solace from reading the following article:

In Baghdad, a Force Under the Militias’ Sway
Infiltration of Iraqi Police Could Delay Handover of Control for Years, U.S. Trainers Suggest

Wanna “win”? What’s another thirty or fourty years of carnage?

Yep. The banking system is Iraq is virtually non existent, so soldiers are given a week off every month to take their dinars home in a paper bag.

Especially not a Chardonnay. Of all the white wines to describe as “crisp,” perhaps only a porto bianco would be less appropriate. :wink: