Well, I don’t watch TV (except for when specifically turn it on for the news and then shut if off in disgust :P) so I don’t know. I’ll take your word for it. I think there’s more of a local fallout than anything.
But how can you be pro death penalty ‘sometimes’? I feel like it’s either all or nothing. I know a lot of people are okay with it except for when it really fails us, but then what if some rapist/murderer is put on trial and is sentenced to death and it’s later found he is innocent? It happens. How sure is ‘sure’? Obviously he’s guilty of the crime, but he’s a sick man.
Thank you for posting this, lieu. You helped make this more personal for us and more real. Your friends have my sympathy for the loss of their son, as do all the victims of this tragic crime. I know how distressed you must be at the news, and you have my sympathy, also.
It is interesting you bring this up now. I’ve just this moment finished reading Malcolm Gladwell’s book ‘The Tipping Point’, and the above link had already reminded me of the passage on teen smoking. (Quick summary: most of the strategies to reduce teen smoking were having the opposite of the intended effect because they were unintentionally glamourizing smoking.)
In the Afterword to the January 2002 first e-book edition, pp. 179 - 184, ‘Understanding the Age of Isolation’ deals with the aftermath of the Columbine shooting. Here is a brief quotation
He continues on from there; I present that as a cite that copycats are a concern.
And as far as I’m concerned, all these loser shooters are copycats - I would be very interested in pursuing what the forensic psychiatrist points up as ‘the wrong way to report on these mass shootings’. To what extent are they influenced by what they know of how previous shooters operated? Most importantly, are the news reports accidentally glamourizing mass shootings through their reportage?
I’ve seen studies showing it’s actually cheaper to keep someone in prison for decades than to put him on Death Row. All the extra security and automatic appeals etc.
I don’t believe a finding of insanity should be based on supposed popular opinion.
Well, there’s zero room for doubt and then there’s zero room for doubt. Ya know what I mean?
“We’ve installed automated gunshot-homing turrets in the ceiling, but there was a tragic incident where someone snapped their gum too loud; they’re working on it”.
Did I say that it was? I simply stated a fact - public opinion doesn’t always recognize the decisions of a court as valid. If this guy is either found incompetent to stand trial, or NGRI (which are two different things), either one is going to create a massive shitstorm of outrage. Just because either of those findings may be legally valid doesn’t mean that people won’t be pissed off at them.
I’m sure that Torrance Brown didn’t come up with this theory and idea to sue everyone associated with the incident on his own…some ambulance chaser signed him up as soon as he could.
Wow. Reminds me of a smaller crime that happened here ten years ago or so. The owner of a mini-mart was shot in the chest during a robbery. During surgery they found a two-inch aneurism on his aorta. Even with his chest already open, it made the surgery team nervous.
Man, you really get picked apart when you do something like this. The CNN website was saying he had completely shunned Facebook, Twitter and such websites, but the authorities were working to determine if he had a sex ad up on Adult Friend Finders.