I got “Progressive Creation.” I’m not a creationist.
Frankly, I didn’t care for the test. Some of the available answers were inconsistent with the questions, and 8 questions is way too short – especially since the first few questions are basic creation v. evolution things that no one needs a quiz to discover about themselves. I also felt like I couldn’t really answer some of the questions without in-depth knowledge of current evolutionary theories/discoveries – I think the questions should have been based more on what people think than what they know.
Three examples of questions I didn’t like:
In question #4, I still don’t like the available answers (or rather, how you interpret them). It’s not logical to say that because I believe fossils are records of evolution I also believe that God created life sequentially. I’m not sure what you mean by “records of how species were formed” – how is that different from evolution? – and the only other option involves the biblical flood.
In question #6, you ask whether evidence shows that whales and elephants have a common ancestor, but then only one of the available answers is about whales and elephants – the rest are about all species. It’s like being asked “do you choose the apple or the pear?” and having an available answer be “the banana.” I chose the “species may have evolved from an archetype but dissimilar species do not share an ancestor” option, because it was the only option that didn’t blatantly say either “yes, everything shares a common ancestor” or “no, God created everything separately.” How was I to know that your “archetype” was created by God, as you explained in this thread? Why are there only two choices? Is it not possible to believe that plants and fish probably don’t share an evolutionary genesis without being labeled a creationist? Also, this is an example of a question I felt I didn’t know enough to answer: I have no idea whether it’s been shown that whales and elephants have a common ancestor.
In question #8, you ask whether humans have souls/life forces that cannot have been created solely as the result of evolution. The “yes” and “maybe” options are ok, but the “no” option says that all human behaviours can be explained by evolution … again, an inconsistency with the question asked.
I know my criticisms sound a little harsh for what is ultimately just an OKCupid test, but you asked. Everyone else seems to like it well enough, so you can probably throw out this post as statistically insignificant. 
To add a little more harshness, since I’m on a roll, I noted a few typos/spelling errors. The test is still ok if you don’t care about them, but if you’re interested I’ll provide a list.
