Well played.
Exactly.
I also agree with posts by FarmerChick, Meyer6, and the OP (but not about Colbri’s moderating).
It’s very easy: 2.5 is a troll. Pure and simple. Heck, I’ve been saying it since he first registered. He’s a troll. Granted a very subtle and clever troll–enough to avoid being banned so far–but a troll nonetheless and nobody could ever convince me (much like I said in that post back then) that he’s anything but a troll.
I knew SBSO was a troll too. It was just glaringly obvious from the first posts, as it was with 2.5. Just look at the topic history. I’m all for controversial topics and posters but there is no way in hell that this guy is serious. A simple search of all of his posts (especially his earlier ones) removes all doubt. There is a vast difference between being a controversial poster and someone who is just trying to get reactions and start pages and pages of trainwrecks. Liberal is controversial, okay? 2.5 Inches is feeding off the attention and is trying to do it time and time again. I’m sure even he’s surprised he hasn’t been banned yet.
He will be. It may not be today or tomorrow or next week, but he will be sometime because he’ll keep stepping it up and/or posting more and more “controversial” things in hopes of creating ruckus’ like this one. I don’t care what anyone says, he will banned eventually and anyone who thinks different is just failing to see the inevitable.
2.5 should not be in a classroom. That is my professional opinion.
You are correct. “Pre-pubescent females” are more familiarly known as little girls. This teacher was talking about the vaginas of little girls when they are “sexually aroused.”
Did someone say earlier that this teacher (who calls himself Two and a Half Inches of Fun) was wondering if it is still rape if the little girl has lubrication while she is being forced?
Just another inquiring mind? He doesn’t pass the sniff test. He’s either a troll or exploitive.
-
We’re judging strangers on their fitness for teaching by analyzing their message board usernames now?
-
“Two and a half inches of fun” is a joint. Not the most education-friendly name, no, but presumably he doesn’t call himself that in the classroom.
And my very non-professional opinion is that you’re probably right. Nonetheless…
Whether little girls can become sexually aroused is, I suppose, dependent on one’s definition of “sexually.” Many young children masturbate, but most don’t have sexual thoughts or feelings associated with it. (Cite)
In post 60, Scarlett67 said, “What the hell would this knowledge add to the discussion? Is child rape OK if the girl gets aroused and lubes up?” but Two and a Half Inches of Fun has neither said nor, IMHO, suggested any such thing.
p.s. I still think he’s a troll.
One wonders the significance of the fact that Scarlett67 was the first one to connect that specific question to it. I guess that requires a…certain kind of imagination that many of us don’t have. Adding to the discussion, indeed.
Oh fer Heaven’s sakes, the idea that “If she’s gets wet, then she must be enjoying it” was hardly invented by Scarlett67.
I reckon it doesn’t really matter as he hasn’t been banned in any case. I don’t tell the police who to arrest, they use that wacky “evidence” stuff. But I don’t need any police living around me, as nothing ever seems to happen when I’m about. I’m Scarlett67 thinks a little too much like the rest of us.
I never said or implied any such thing. Whether any female produces lubrication is completely irrelevant to the issue of rape. The only issue is consent. A prepubescent girl cannot concent so it is automatically rape. An adult woman who does not consent, but who produces lubrication, is being raped.
Am I allowed to ask what this sentence means without being lynched?
I do not speak Doctor-talk.
“Genital manipulation to ease insertion of a tampon should be avoided because except for the statistically rare cases of precociousness premature females will not produce significant lubrication to ease penetration. In any case and in Practical terms if discovered such techniques should be discouraged and measures should be taken to treat the patient’s anxiety and reinforce the benefits of proper menstrual care. Thorough parental consultation is vital.”
Shut the fuck up, you fucking troll.
I love you, too.
By God, I knew we could all get along somehow.
I didn’t say she was the first one ever to make the connection. I’m just bothered by the fact that she–not 2.5"–has come in and said it and now blames 2.5" for it. And I’m really squicked out by the concept itself, and I wish she hadn’t come in and said it. That post was a lot more bothersome than 2.5"'s OP to me, personally.
If 2½"oF truly is a teacher inquiring about the lubrication properties of little girl vaginas while naming himself after a joint, I’m sure his school board would love to hear about it. Perhaps the media as well. Shouldn’t be too hard to track him down via his IP address.
But it’s far more likely that he’s just a juvenile troll – 12 or 13 would be my guess. And his “teacher” identity is probably derived from how he spends ten minutes each day picking up pencils in Ms. Hoover’s class, which of course got him labeled as a teacher’s pet so therefore he has no friends. Which is why he spends so much time here. And through his behavior here we can all see why he has no friends, teacher’s pet or no.
Nice try, kid. Enjoy puberty while it lasts.
How do you know what his name refers to? But assuming that you are correct and actually know this person, then he isn’t being very discreet, is he? This is the sort of thing that keeps teachers from being hired into permanent positions or from receiving tenure.
But if all of the teachers who have been one toke over the line were fired, there would be a great shortage of educators. His attitude in broadcasting the news is juvenile and six feet of stupid.
Scarlett67 did not suggest that 2.5 Inches had asked the question about little girls and rape. I could not recall exactly what had been said about that or by whom. That’s why I asked for clarification.. He has made it clear that that was not what he said or what he believes about either children or adult females.
Why are you so eager to twist people’ words, Hostile? Or in your user name did you just misspell one of those inexpensive places to stay when travelling in Europe?
My name is not a reference to a joint or anything to do with drugs. I am not a drug user.
Just to put everyone’s mind at ease, I would never even consider doing anything inappropriate with a student. The only way I would consider touching a student is to backhand one the annoying jerks that just will not shut up, but of course I can’t do that.
And my teaching career will be coming to an end in the next couple of weeks, probably next week. It was just something to do short term. It wasn’t a bad job, but it is not something I am interested in doing long term. And I would kill myself if I had to work with children (I prefer subbing for high school) longterm because I do not like children on any level—which is kind of ironic considering some of things I have been accused of in this thread.
Well, why don’t you tell us once and for all what it does mean, then?
OK, I am feeling nice, but it is really stupid and meaningless.
I don’t like to give out the information for free. I ask that you, on you honor, donate something to the Cancer Research Institute and not reveal the the origin to those that did not donate. Whatever you can give is fine.
http://www.cancerresearch.org/give.html
OK, now that you have donated:
About 10 years ago I was talking about the internet with some people. I don’t remember the conversation that well, but someone said the internet was fun. And then someone asked how fun and I responded about 2 1/2 inches of fun. Then it became a stupid joke.