Think this may be a board record for quickest Pitting. Why wait? This asswipe has two whole posts, and has already managed to creep me the fuck out.
Dude…a kiddie diddler is a defective human being. Their bodies should be recycled, perhaps as fertilizer or pig food or something. There is no justification whatsoever for that shit.
Piss off. And whatever the strongest possible insult allowed on this board may be, consider that I just said it to you.
While I understand this pitting, I think you should have given its subject some more time to dig his own hole. It’s funner that way.
I think you need a higher threshold for things creeping you out.
I took that thread as kids having sex with each other, as opposed to a pedophile situation.
And you can also read the above post for an example of the hysterical witch hunting that occurs in regards to any attempt to have a rational discussion on the issue.
Maybe. But his use of the words “claim” and “justification” in his second post just reek of creepiness to me.
Also, I note that he is a new poster, and these are his first two posts. I smell footwear…perhaps even ranker due to being worn by a person who dwells under a bridge and fears Big Billy Goat Gruff.
Same. Not sure I can get on board with this one.
His post seemed relatively thought-out and inquisitive, not “get in the van I have candy.”
Mneh, I’m seeing that thread as a bit ambiguous so far - he neither says “Why can’t a kid consent to sex with an adult?” which would be on the creepy side nor “Why can’t kids consent to sex with each other?” which is decidedly less creepy. And right now his tone is academic, rather than salacious; sounds more like he might be setting up for a RL debate rather than whining that he can’t get his 11-year-old girlfriend in bed. I’d be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. So far.
Oak’s threshold seems pretty appropriate to me. I didn’t respond in that thread because I figured the OP had to be either a trolll or some delusional fucking NAMBLA-type for whom the only real solution is incarceration and/or execution.
I didn’t. The OP of that thread wrote children, not teenagers. And while I tend to think of 16-year-olds as still being kids, the failure to distinguish between such and 6-year-olds was suspicious to me,if not quite diagnostic.
Fair point, I didn’t really notice that.
It depends entirely on what the OP considers “children,” though.
The creepy thing is that he posted it originally in GQ, not GD. I’m just glad he didn’t tag it with, “need answer fast!”
Which could also mean 2 prepubescent children playing with each other.
If he’d meant two prepubescent children playing with one another, he could have said so. Phrasing the question as he did is suspicious and, as Oak wrote, creepy.
Given the obvious controversial nature of the question, I think if he’d legitimately wanted to talk about “Romeo & Juliet” scenarios, he would have taken pains to make that perfectly clear in his OP.
Maybe I’m wrong. If that turns out to be the case, please feel free to call me names on the internet.
No one two posts into their SDMB career has EVER taken pains to do anything. There’s a GQ thread right now by someone with over 40,000 posts on a topic that gets asked every 3 weeks - but I don’t expect that person to take pains to do anything of effort either. However, that does lend itself to the possibility that the object of your affection is a troll or sock. But still - two posts in is a little premature. At the very least, everyone in that thread should have either ignored him or asked for clarification.
Well Munch, if starting a premature Pitting is the worst thing I do today, I’m going to call it a win.
Well, you could always go tell Duke that his suicide attempt was half-assed again, and tell him once more to man up. That should balance out the ledger.
I was going to go with “sign of the Apocalypse” or “logical impossibility”, but I guess “win” would be an o.k. description. 
I think this thread may be a prime example of premature ejectulation.