This is CNN’s preliminary report. Not much is known yet, but the explosion happened Saturday evening in a trash receptacle near 23rd Street and 6th Avenue. It was definitely a bomb, not anything like a gas leak.
I used to live just three blocks from there, and I know how crowded that area can be on a nice Saturday evening. I’m surprised there haven’t been any fatalities.
They just said it happened outside 131 W. 23rd St. in Manhattan. Any NYC Dopers have an idea what is at that address that would result in someone planting a bomb?
It’s not necessarily targeted at a specific building or business. That might just have been a convenient spot to place it. If your aim is to cause fear, the specific location might not matter very much.
CNN says only one of three bombs went off in NJ, while a second one that didn’t go off has been found in Manhattan. Sounds like someone can’t make bombs too well. Thank goodness.
So it was The Girl Scouts? Yeah, maybe not Islamic terrorists, or the PLO/IRA/KKK, or some “terrorist organization”, but I think a bomb in a dumpster is probably loosely intended to incite terror.
The authorities are affirming it was an “intentional act” but stopping short of saying “terrorism.” Jealous lover? Business dispute? (I feel certain it will be some form of terrorism, just that they want to be sure.)
Chelsea is an upscale residential area. W23rd Street is a busy cross street that always has cars and pedestrian traffic. I don’t think it was targeted at a specific address. Just left in a busy area where it would cause damage.
Two doors away, the other side of next door St. Vincent dePaul, was Tekserv which closed in August. I was there quite a few times for my Macs, pre Apple Store days and just to visit a very cool store. Really pinpoints the area for me.
Scratch that. No third device. It turned out to be just a bag of garbage.
As for whether the day’s events constitute terrorism, I think the word brings up in many people’s minds a) Isis, al-Qaeda etc; or b) some home-grown version thereof. But always for political or religious motivations. I think that’s why they’re not labeling it “terrorism” yet, in order to rule out some nutcase who might just be blowing up stuff for grins. Sure, that could be terrorism too, but these days a) or b) seems to have co-opted the definition.