"“He asked if we could go to my dressing room so he could masturbate in front of me.” Stunned and angry, Ms. Corry said she declined, and pointed out that he had a daughter and a pregnant wife. “His face got red,” she recalled, “and he told me he had issues.””
That’s not inappropriate?
It’s totally inappropriate, but okay, whatever. So it would have been appropriate for me to ask my female colleague in my hotel room during a break if I could masturbate in front of her? Cuz that sure as shit would not have been appropriate in my book and would have killed my reputation in the tight-knit photo community. Just because you ask doesn’t make it appropriate.
I am a female sex positive educator and the kink that he identifies with is CFNM. Men (and women) who enjoy that kink are typically self depreciating human beings.
Not to mention if you ask someone to participate in a kink of yours and they treat you like that, yes you are very likely to think something is wrong with you.
So it seems the responsibility is on him then. If it’s a kink like that, then he should realize it’s not shared by most people. Just like any kink, he shouldn’t go up to random strangers and ask them to participate in it unless he has a very good idea they would be into it.
The ‘females’ (interesting word choice) actually did say that it was unwanted. If you think the quoted material below indicates that his masturbation was wanted, then there is something very wrong with your understanding of ‘wanted’, even leaving aside the issues of coerced consent and cover-up. Note that the second one doesn’t even allow for your ‘he asked and she didn’t say no’ rape-apologist excuse, as he didn’t ask. If this is your idea of consensual sexual encounters, you should NOT be teaching any kind of sex education at all.
And you don’t get to dispute the stories, because Louis CK has said quite clearly that they’re true. And yes, he did clearly state that he knows it was unwanted, that’s what the material below means.
Two of the below quotes were from the same girl who all she said was “I knew it was bad” Guess what. lots of sex acts are “bad” and people like them because of that. She also freely agreed to participate on several occasions.
Let break down the 5 ladies.
Freely agreed to participate on several occasions.
Participated in sexual conversation on the phone and assumed he was masturbating and stayed on the phone the whole time (Never said she didn’t want to, just said she was dumfounded)
He asked her and she said no, then she made fun of him
4 & 5 agreed to go to his hotel room. When he asked them they giggled and watched him “get undressed till he was totally naked” and then left.
No one so much as hinted at being forced/coerced or threatened,
This is about George Takei but I’m gonna post it here because I want to know if you all feel the same about him.
There are videos of Takei jerking guys off on the Howard Stern show. Censored but still NSFW in case anyone wants to see: Howard Stern George Takei Gay Bachelor Party Video
It seems to me that by both of the standards that people are judging Louis CK by, George’s career should be over as well, if you’re going to be consistent. The other people on the room didn’t give expressed consent. They stood there watching and laughing, exactly what the women in Louis’s hotel-room incident did. Plus they were also at their place of work, which supposedly negates even expressed consent and is the problem with the other Louis CK incidents.
Do you all consider everyone in that room to be victims of a crime or a civil tort of sexual harassment? Should George have his career ended based on this video, aside from the other allegations against him?