A Pennsylvania man has been charged with illegally casting a ballot for President Trump in the name of his deceased mother in this year’s presidential election, authorities announced on Monday.
Clearly the only adequate remedy is to Invalidate all Trump votes in Pennsylvania!
It’s ballots that are secret, you’re allowed to read news stories.
Stollsteimer said Bartman had registered both [dead] women as Republicans and told investigators he had done so to help reelect Donald Trump. The district attorney said he only mentioned the party affiliation because of multiple conspiracy theories circulating about voter fraud, adding that this is the only case during this election that his office has encountered.
I also love that his lawyer cites his client’s “political frustration” as though that’s some kind of mitigation. If I steal someone’s car, is “vehicular frustration” a defense? Let’s not even think about how this guy might defend a sexual assault.
Republicans are transparent like children. Always talking about someone commiting voter fraud, because they know full well they’re open to doing it. Hell, screwing with the vote is a full time job for Republican politicians. The only voting system that a Republican is pleased with is one that disenfranchises voters, rather than one that encourages and enables voting.
Ooh, it’s frightening, it’s… it’s… the voice of the people!
I knew there was no way in hell Trump got as many votes as he did. Mass voter fraud explains it. Trump is correct it was a landslide election. trump’s votes are right wing fraud, investigate the red counties and find the truth.
True enough. He registered his dead relatives as Republicans, and said is motivation was to help reelect Donald Trump. It would be quite wrong to draw any inference about how he cast the illegal vote. So nobody really knows. It’s a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
Actually, they do. From the article linked in the OP’s article.
Bartman used his mother’s driver’s license to register her to vote online, and then requested and filled out an absentee ballot in her name, Stollsteimer said. He repeated the process for Weihman, his mother-in-law, using her Social Security number. The state’s system flagged the information as belonging to a dead person, but Bartman signed a letter confirming the woman was still alive.
He did not, however, cast a ballot in Weihman’s name, according to prosecutors.
The adjudication of the case will not address the question of which candidate he voted for, because that’s not an element of the charge laid. So we already have the best evidence we are going to have on this matter; his own public assertions about his acts and the motivation for them. You are as well-positioned as you will ever be to divine this mystery.
We may never know. But that’s as it should be. The most important democratic principle at stake here is that we must assure the secrecy of illegal votes. Otherwise the risk is obvious - somebody about to cast an illegal vote might be intimidated or bribed.