Irishman, his explanantion still doesn’t cut it if you go past the initial hammer post and read further.
Yes, it started with “not this again”* but read the entire warning:
You respond with:
So the only reasonable assumption is that what seems IMHO be a swift and strong warning was not enough for you in the specific case of Argent Towers. Tell me what would have been a more hammer-like response that doesn’t include a banning? Were you calling for a suspension?
*I’ll note that by your definition you are “lying” about what Ed said, as his actual words were “I swear, it’s one fricking thing after another.”