I have an idea for what could be a very interesting thread.
The old God question has been kicked around at length recently. Ken, Lib and I and a few others had been making a lot of noise on the subject when the Pounder Invasion happened (and I like the folks that have stayed a lot!). Okay, to a theist, nothing is more obvious than the underlying presence of God in the world. Somehow, neither formal logic, reference to the Bible, nor observational data seem to have convinced the other posters of this. :o Maybe what we need to do is, given those datasets, to agree to disagree.
But there is one thing that unites the entire SDMB affiliates: a devotion to the truth. Give us an urban legend, and we swarm as one to debunk it.
Here’s my thought: at least a few of us Christians have undergone a conversion experience or series of experiences where we apprehended empirically something that we took to be the presence of God. I’ve told my story on this in brief a couple of times, Lib has alluded to his, and either or both of Tris and RT have mentioned something of the sort. I’d suspect that at least one or two Pounders have experiences to report as well. I’d suggest that any of us who are willing submit our “how I met God” stories to analysis.
A couple of ground rules seem appropriate:
[ul][li]This is not, except for the obvious, witnessing time. We’re doing reportage on events in our lives in this thread, for analysis. If it happens to function as an effective witness, so much the better – I hope it will. But that’s not the primary purpose.[/li][li]Whether or not a given poster believes or disbelieves is not at issue. An assertion to the effect that “Your ‘god’ does not exist, so that’s all bull-puckey” is as far out of place here as quoting off John 1:14 to prove him would be. If you’re convinced it’s bull-puckey, ask questions to prove it.[/li][li]Clearly one objective analysis of the stories would be that we are all self-deluded. For purposes of this thread, that is a trivial solution. It may be one possible explanation, but it proves nothing.[/li][li]Our job in reporting is to be as objective as possible. Distinguish “God said to me…” from “I heard a voice in my head that purported to be God which said to me…”[/li][li]Hurt feelings are quite possible. In your analytical questioning, be critical but be gentle. Things of prime importance to those subjecting themselves to questioning are being dealt with. And, given that, if somebody seems to be sniping at you, give it a charitable interpretation if possible.[/li][li]There are no preconceptions being made here. We are seeking to get at the truth behind reported experiences, and only indirectly proving or disproving some metaphysical concept underlying them.[/ul][/li]
Does this sound like a worthwhile process?
Next time, do it right.