There appears to be a bug in the search engine. I’ve been trying for the better part of the day to find an old thread, but no go. The first time, I set my search to “A year ago or older”, since I thought that the thread was more than a year ago. After the expected long wait, I got to a screen that told me that sorry, nothing was found to match my search terms. So I go back to the search input page, and change my search to “A year ago or newer”. Eventually, I get a blank page. I try “any date”, and get the same blank page. I wait several hours and try again… The same. And by “blank page”, I mean exactly that: When I view source, the entire page consists of <html><body></body></html> . What’s happening to the search engine, and how can we get around it?
For what it’s worth, btw, the thread I was trying to find was a Cafe Society thread about the movie The Time Machine, in which I posted some calculations concerning the Moon.
Maybe “time” is one of those words that the search engine doesn’t index, due to its popularity as a word on the boards? I know there was a thread about this some time ago, and Una Persson posted a link to the “bad words” you mustn’t search for.
This might be it, only there are no calculations in the post. It’s about the movie The Time Machine, and that’s the only one I could find in the search.
The calculations are on the second page. Dunno whether it was a prohibited word or what, but user=Chronos, forum=Cafe Society and keyword=moon brought it right up. Apparently so did keyword=machine.
That is indeed the thread, which makes me wonder why I didn’t find it. I used keywords “time machine” (without quotes, of course), search titles only, forum Cafe Society, username Chronos, a year ago or older. Even if “time” is a badword, the search engine should still have processed the search on “machine”, right? Is the search engine perhaps case-specific? I don’t think I capitalized “time machine” in my search.
OK, Chronos. I can’t test here since the Search is so slow, and I can’t view the source code from where I am, but I did some testing on my Board to confirm.
It seems, from testing searching for a thread titled “Snopes Siting”, that the terms in the field are AND delimited by default. That is, I did a “Search on titles” for
Snopes
and it worked. I did a search for
Snopes Siting
and it worked. Then I did a search on
Snopes Siting Wolverine
and it failed. Thus, it looks like it’s doing an AND. And if one of the words you are searching for is a “badword”, then perhaps it returns a “fail”, and the AND fails. Does that make sense?