I am confused as to why a strategic portion of that image is blurred out. Is that really more offensive than the rest?
I appreciate the large, red warning, treis, but the Registration Agreement spells out what to do when you want to share offensive or shocking images:
Next time, please just follow the two-click rule and the link can stay up.
That’s only because you’re not obsessed with “racial purity.” In the context of the thread, a member with a very high “reputation” rating on a racist site is offering Mr. Weber as an example of a fine Nordic type. An example of him dressed in a bekishe, with a big “jewy” beard and payot – that’s just delicious irony.
Understand the mindset of the audience. They’re not going to think that this long-standing member intentionally linked to poop-porn. They will see him offering up a jewy jew jew as an example of racial purity, probably assume he meant to do it, and hilarity will ensue. Especially since other members have already agreed with the guy about his assessment. From their point of view, this is something to get worked up about in a way that a crude porno image isn’t.
It’s a clever chainyank. Nice going, choie!
I hope you don’t mind, but I googled that website. So far, no reactions yet.