A serious question for Sam Stone on Factual Errors

[Sam_Stone]

By the way, this was what I said in the very first thread on this in October 2020:

@Sam_Stone

In fairness, it could well be that 99% of the E-mails and other information are true, but that the drive is ‘salted’ with nuggets of disinformation. That’s how spooks do it. They aren’t going to fake gigabytes of pictures and other data. They’re going to hack or steal a real hard drive, then inject a few fake things that look real because everything else checks out.

Trying to prove that there is no disinformation by checking random E-mails or photos is exactly what the spooks expect you to do. So the only way to ‘validate’ the salacious material that matters is to fact-check that material independently of any other fact checks - something that hasn’t really been done yet.

That seems pretty fair. Since I posted that, a huge amount of the data on the drive HAS been validated. For example, checking emails by going to the recipients and validating that they had copies of the same email, or checking for copies of legal documents found on the drive.